The Socialist State Provides

[Synthaholic]

Trump’s puppet master is very happy with the new business from China.

 

[Anathema]

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

However, the Government WILL own the only non-cash option to pay the hospitals, so it’s still a Progressive shit-show.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Trump’s puppet master is very happy with the new business from China.

You're not even a GOOD troll anymore.

 

[dblack]

Well your Dem politicians are certainly welcome to tell farmers they won’t get a cent from them if elected.

That’s right. They don’t want it. They want to sell their products, not have them rot in storage.

How pathetic that “conservatives” are now cheering the Welfare State.

Conservatives cheer the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Republicans ...

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

 

[dblack]

I never heard you moonbats complain about subsidies in farm country -especially for engine-wrecking ETOH and those goofy windmills- before.

What's the problem now?

No, you don't get to pull this bullshit. You guys are the ones always talking about socialism. Here is a classic example of it. The OP is right.

So, The State owns all the farms?...Are they making any move to nationalize them all?

The OP and you are dopey hacks, who are trying to score a cheap political point....And you've failed.

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

So I guess it's almost-but-not-quite socialism in your book. Call it whatever you want. It still sucks and I don't want it. Way too much power concentrated under government.

 

[Synthaholic]

Well your Dem politicians are certainly welcome to tell farmers they won’t get a cent from them if elected.

That’s right. They don’t want it. They want to sell their products, not have them rot in storage.

How pathetic that “conservatives” are now cheering the Welfare State.

Conservatives cheer the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Republicans ...

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

Why are you talking about subsidies when this is an illegal bailout of an industry that is in crisis due to Trump's trade war. It's Socialism, using taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers.

 

[Synthaholic]

I never heard you moonbats complain about subsidies in farm country -especially for engine-wrecking ETOH and those goofy windmills- before.

What's the problem now?

No, you don't get to pull this bullshit. You guys are the ones always talking about socialism. Here is a classic example of it. The OP is right.

So, The State owns all the farms?...Are they making any move to nationalize them all?

The OP and you are dopey hacks, who are trying to score a cheap political point....And you've failed.

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

So I guess it's almost-but-not-quite socialism in your book. Call it whatever you want. It still sucks and I don't want it. Way too much power concentrated under government.

The difference is Medicare 4 All is "Socialism" that will benefit millions of citizens. Trump's hush-money "Socialism" payoffs to farmers benefit only him. Not the country. Not the citizens.

 

[Oddball]

My socialism good....because I say so.

Your socialism bad....because I say so.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I never heard you moonbats complain about subsidies in farm country -especially for engine-wrecking ETOH and those goofy windmills- before.

What's the problem now?

No, you don't get to pull this bullshit. You guys are the ones always talking about socialism. Here is a classic example of it. The OP is right.

So, The State owns all the farms?...Are they making any move to nationalize them all?

The OP and you are dopey hacks, who are trying to score a cheap political point....And you've failed.

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

So I guess it's almost-but-not-quite socialism in your book. Call it whatever you want. It still sucks and I don't want it. Way too much power concentrated under government.

The difference is Medicare 4 All is "Socialism" that will benefit millions of citizens. Trump's hush-money "Socialism" payoffs to farmers benefit only him. Not the country. Not the citizens.

I never heard you moonbats complain about subsidies in farm country -especially for engine-wrecking ETOH and those goofy windmills- before.

What's the problem now?

No, you don't get to pull this bullshit. You guys are the ones always talking about socialism. Here is a classic example of it. The OP is right.

So, The State owns all the farms?...Are they making any move to nationalize them all?

The OP and you are dopey hacks, who are trying to score a cheap political point....And you've failed.

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

So I guess it's almost-but-not-quite socialism in your book. Call it whatever you want. It still sucks and I don't want it. Way too much power concentrated under government.

The difference is Medicare 4 All is "Socialism" that will benefit millions of citizens. Trump's hush-money "Socialism" payoffs to farmers benefit only him. Not the country. Not the citizens.

Libs have many payoffs to keep their voters sucking on the govt tit. None of them benefit me. Your faux outrage is noted. You can't even troll anymore.

 

[Synthaholic]

My socialism good....because I say so.

Your socialism bad....because I say so.

View attachment 280708

Another replacement-level post from you. You've got nothing, and you never have. I've been reading your bullshit since at least 2004, going back to Hannity. You never post facts, and whenever you're getting your ass handed to you in a thread you bust out memes like this instead of defending your position with logic. What a loser.

 

[Denizen]

The fallout from the trade war is slowly emerging as the cost of support for farmers is being exposed.

The problem is its not just farmers that are hurting. Rural communities are hurting from the reduction in spending and job losses from the economic pressure on farmers.

The GOP criticized Obama for the auto bailout of 2009 but are silent about the trade war and farm bailout.

"Farmer ... have reached $28 billion, about double the amount of money shelled out in the government bailout of Detroit automakers in 2009."

Farm aid from Trump’s trade war has cost more than double the 2009 auto bailout

Farm aid from Trump’s trade war has cost more than double the 2009 auto bailout

Farmer subsidies from the Trump administration aimed at mitigating the effects of the U.S.-China trade war have reached $28 billion, about double the amount of money shelled out in the government bailout of Detroit automakers in 2009, Bloomberg reports.
Why it matters: Trump's bailout still doesn't cover all of the farmers' losses. The government has provided $973 million in aid to Iowa farmers during a trade war that is estimated to have cost them $1.7 billion in losses, according to Iowa State University researchers cited by Bloomberg. ...

 

[Synthaholic]

No, you don't get to pull this bullshit. You guys are the ones always talking about socialism. Here is a classic example of it. The OP is right.

So, The State owns all the farms?...Are they making any move to nationalize them all?

The OP and you are dopey hacks, who are trying to score a cheap political point....And you've failed.

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

So I guess it's almost-but-not-quite socialism in your book. Call it whatever you want. It still sucks and I don't want it. Way too much power concentrated under government.

The difference is Medicare 4 All is "Socialism" that will benefit millions of citizens. Trump's hush-money "Socialism" payoffs to farmers benefit only him. Not the country. Not the citizens.

No, you don't get to pull this bullshit. You guys are the ones always talking about socialism. Here is a classic example of it. The OP is right.

So, The State owns all the farms?...Are they making any move to nationalize them all?

The OP and you are dopey hacks, who are trying to score a cheap political point....And you've failed.

Under Medicare For All, The State will not own all the hospitals, so it’s not Socialism.

So I guess it's almost-but-not-quite socialism in your book. Call it whatever you want. It still sucks and I don't want it. Way too much power concentrated under government.

The difference is Medicare 4 All is "Socialism" that will benefit millions of citizens. Trump's hush-money "Socialism" payoffs to farmers benefit only him. Not the country. Not the citizens.

Libs have many payoffs to keep their voters sucking on the govt tit. None of them benefit me. Your faux outrage is noted. You can't even troll anymore.

Name them.

 

[bripat9643]

I remember so-called “conservatives” were grabbin’ their pitchforks in OUTRAGE over Obama bailing out the Auto industry for $12B. And they paid back every cent. Think the farmers will be required to repay the US taxpayer? If not this is flat-out Socialism.

But now the Right is a cult who won’t criticize Dear Leader.

View attachment 280562


https://t.co/ZkGZ0ajsS1

The auto industry did not pay back every cent, especially the UAW. The taxpayers got stuck making good on UAW pensions. The stock holders and bond holders also got it up the ass.

 

[dblack]

That’s right. They don’t want it. They want to sell their products, not have them rot in storage.

How pathetic that “conservatives” are now cheering the Welfare State.

Conservatives cheer the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Republicans ...

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

Why are you talking about subsidies when this is an illegal bailout of an industry that is in crisis due to Trump's trade war. It's Socialism, using taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers.

I agree. Trump is no conservative. In many ways, he's as bad as the Democrats.

 

[bripat9643]

Conservatives cheer the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Republicans ...

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

Why are you talking about subsidies when this is an illegal bailout of an industry that is in crisis due to Trump's trade war. It's Socialism, using taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers.

I agree. Trump is no conservative. In many ways, he's as bad as the Democrats.

He's more conservative than George Bush was, and I don't recall any of you douchebags calling Bush a liberal.

 

[dblack]

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

Why are you talking about subsidies when this is an illegal bailout of an industry that is in crisis due to Trump's trade war. It's Socialism, using taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers.

I agree. Trump is no conservative. In many ways, he's as bad as the Democrats.

He's more conservative than George Bush was, and I don't recall any of you douchebags calling Bush a liberal.

I did. Routinely. Still do.

 

[kyzr]

The government didn't shell out any part of the $28b in aid to the farmers. More "fake news" from the MSM.
The US took in $59b year-to-date in tariffs, so should net about $100b for 2019, thats a net gain in revenue.


Trump tariffs: How much is US collecting in revenue?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The government didn't shell out any part of the $28b in aid to the farmers. More "fake news" from the MSM.
The US took in $59b year-to-date in tariffs, so should net about $100b for 2019, thats a net gain in revenue.


Trump tariffs: How much is US collecting in revenue?

Those tariffs that our citizens are paying....so just more tax dollars

 

[Oddball]

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

Why are you talking about subsidies when this is an illegal bailout of an industry that is in crisis due to Trump's trade war. It's Socialism, using taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers.

I agree. Trump is no conservative. In many ways, he's as bad as the Democrats.

He's more conservative than George Bush was, and I don't recall any of you douchebags calling Bush a liberal.

I routinely roasted the **** out of Chimpola, to the squeals of delight of phony hacks like Synthia....And he knows it.

 

[Synthaholic]

Conservatives cheer the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Republicans ...

Whereas Democrats only cheer for the welfare state when it benefits the political welfare of Democrats. Yep, hypocrites galore.

What do you think C? Should government be subsidizing farmers?

No, when it benefits the people who directly receive that “welfare”. That’s when we cheer. Bleeding hearts, remember?

You don't think the farm subsidies benefit farmers?

Why are you talking about subsidies when this is an illegal bailout of an industry that is in crisis due to Trump's trade war. It's Socialism, using taxpayer dollars to pick winners and losers.

I agree. Trump is no conservative. In many ways, he's as bad as the Democrats.

Then reject Dem-Lite and go for the real thing. Seriously dude, 4 years of Democratic policies is a worthwhile price for saving democracy in America. Think of your grandkids living in a Trumpian future. I've always known you to not be a wingnut, just a rightwinger, so I'm guessing you're not a Cult45 member. Hoping, anyway.