The Shitters have a racism problem

That was a Teabagger in that staged video!

ROFL

Pathetic, even for you, edtheliar.

Just as the phony shit photo was staged, so was this video. GOP operatives were told to attack the demonstrators any way they can and the current GOP meme is the demonstrators are anti-Semitic.

Nobody has been more ridiculous in trying to project this onto the demonstrators than Stuttering LimpTard. He has invented a new code word for a Jew, "the 1%." That's right, 1% is code for Jew, and since the demonstrators are the 99% who are anti the "1%" they are anti-Semitic! :rofl::lmao:
Now everyone knows 1% is not now and has never been code for Jew, but other very common CON$ervative pet words, like "elite" and "Hollywood" are code for Jew. So every time you hear a CON$ervative use the words Hollywood Elite you now know they are showing their anti-Semitism!!! :lol:

October 11, 2011
RUSH: These people are running around saying "I'm the 99%." These signs I just shared with you in the first half hour of these people writing, "I am the 99%" is how each of them ends. That's the last line in each of these signs, or messages, that these people are writing. But they are touting themselves as the 99%.
Now, some people think the 99%'s also the 99 weeks of unemployment compensation because that group also calls themselves the 99ers, but the 99% versus the 1% is another angle that the group is talking about here, and Wall Street and bankers, those two terms have been anti-Semitic code for Jews in this country for a long time. Occupier, Occupy Wall Street Now. I've often said, I said last week he who controls the definition of words, the meaning of words, controls the debate. He who controls the language controls the debate. There's a lot of interesting stuff here. Occupy Wall Street Now, 99%, that leaves 1%, roughly the percentage of Jews in the population
 
I wonder if uncensored is willing to put it on his word that he's never said anything racist on this board.
 
I wonder if uncensored is willing to put it on his word that he's never said anything racist on this board.

I've never said anything that was actually racist.

I've denied that Obama is god, so to jillian and other mindless sycophants, I am a racist.

If racism is judging people by the color of their skin, then nothing I've ever posted here is racist.

If racism is failing to march in lockstep with the democratic party, as most of the leftists here claim, well....

As is often the case, Ayn Rand said it exquisitely.

{Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man's genetic lineage -- the notion that a man's intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors. }
 
I wonder if uncensored is willing to put it on his word that he's never said anything racist on this board.

I've never said anything that was actually racist.

I've denied that Obama is god, so to jillian and other mindless sycophants, I am a racist.

If racism is judging people by the color of their skin, then nothing I've ever posted here is racist.

If racism is failing to march in lockstep with the democratic party, as most of the leftists here claim, well....

As is often the case, Ayn Rand said it exquisitely.

{Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man's genetic lineage -- the notion that a man's intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors. }

I agree, racism is the least of Little Adolf's problems. :cool:
 
I wonder if uncensored is willing to put it on his word that he's never said anything racist on this board.

I've never said anything that was actually racist.
I've denied that Obama is god, so to jillian and other mindless sycophants, I am a racist.

If racism is judging people by the color of their skin, then nothing I've ever posted here is racist.

If racism is failing to march in lockstep with the democratic party, as most of the leftists here claim, well....

As is often the case, Ayn Rand said it exquisitely.

{Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man's genetic lineage -- the notion that a man's intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors. }

:lol:
 
This is not racism; it's bigotry. Judaism is not a race; it's a religion.
Prejudice, bigotry and racism: Is there a difference?

Yes
nope:prejudice, bigotry and racism: Is there a difference?

Share | I've stirred up some controversy in the comments salon -- what, again? -- with my observation about the "old equation" -- Racism equals bigotry plus power.

One respondent, "FedUp," who described himself as "a white male of modest means" wrote:

That's nothing but a politically correct cop-out to excuse and erase the pervasive racism that exists against whites in the black community.

My answer relies on my definition of terms, which is a subjective interpretation of the less-than-helpful dictionary entries:

I think of racial prejudice as a private thought -- a personal response to an individual or situation that is based, fairly or unfairly, on experience and observation. It's usually but not always a negative response; an invidious pre-judgment.

I think of bigotry as an act that is motivated by a negative prejudice -- those thoughts turned into deeds.

And I think of racism as a systemic application of bigotry and prejudice -- the use of such sentiments to deprive group members of opportunity, dignity, safety and certain other rights based on their membership in that group and an inner belief that this group is inferior.

It's prejudice when Mr. Smith feels unhappy when Mr. Johnson moves in next door because he doesn't like Mr. Johnson's skin color or ethnic identity.
It's bigotry when Mr. Smith refuses to invite Mr. Johnson into his home or offer him friendly waves of greeting.
It's racism when Mr. Smith uses threats and intimidation to attempt to drive Mr. Johnson and his family out of the neighborhood.
The racial and ethnic identities are clearly interchangeable in the first two examples. Member of all groups are capable of prejudice and bigotry and routinely practice it.

But my argument is that it's unlikely, at best, that, in the third example, Mr. Johnson would be white and Mr. Smith would be black. And even if it were to be the case in some isolated incident, it's disingenuous to say that the problem of housing discrimination against whites is analogous to the problem of housing discrimination against blacks.

Politically, institutionally, culturally and historically, bigoted acts motivated by prejudice against white people have not been and are not significant roadblocks to the advancement, dignity and quality of life of white people.

And any discussion of the problem of how to alleviate the problem of racism gets off on the wrong foot when it tries to start from the trivializing premise that we're all guilty of it.

I admit, though, that my view of this is through my particular lens. How do you see these words, these concepts and, then, this problem?


Change of Subject: Prejudice, bigotry and racism: Is there a difference?
 

Forum List

Back
Top