The Sham of "Settled Science" -- Like Global warming itself, that too was a lie

[teapartysamurai]

The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen experts,” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony.

“Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous,” the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered “the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.”

Hulme, Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia – the university of Climategate fame — is the founding Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and one of the UK’s most prominent climate scientists. Among his many roles in the climate change establishment, Hulme was the IPCC’s co-ordinating Lead Author for its chapter on ‘Climate scenario development’ for its Third Assessment Report and a contributing author of several other chapters.

Full report from which this came here:

The Sham of ‘Settled Science’ — Insider Says There Was No IPCC Consensus - Big Journalism

Bottom line:

Once AGAIN, we have SCIENCE taking a back seat to a POLITICAL GRAB FOR POWER, and that was all "Global Warming" was ever about.

It's a hoax, just as conservatives have been saying for 30 years.

The proof that liberals don't care about FACTS is, the evidence keeps mounting this was a hoax, and they still cling to this myth of global warming, regardless of the evidence.

And then they say Christians are the ones that believe myths?

It's also proof that global warming IS the religion of liberals.

Who was it that said take away the belief in God, and you will believe in anything?

This is a perfect example of that axiom right here.

Cue up the sputtering of hysterical enviro-wackos, I hear them coming now.

 

[sangha]

The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change misled the press and public into believing that thousands of scientists backed its claims on manmade global warming, according to Mike Hulme, a prominent climate scientist and IPCC insider. The actual number of scientists who backed that claim was “only a few dozen experts,” he states in a paper for Progress in Physical Geography, co-authored with student Martin Mahony.

“Claims such as ‘2,500 of the world’s leading scientists have reached a consensus that human activities are having a significant influence on the climate’ are disingenuous,” the paper states unambiguously, adding that they rendered “the IPCC vulnerable to outside criticism.”

Hulme, Professor of Climate Change in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia – the university of Climategate fame — is the founding Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and one of the UK’s most prominent climate scientists. Among his many roles in the climate change establishment, Hulme was the IPCC’s co-ordinating Lead Author for its chapter on ‘Climate scenario development’ for its Third Assessment Report and a contributing author of several other chapters.

Full report from which this came here:

The Sham of ‘Settled Science’ — Insider Says There Was No IPCC Consensus - Big Journalism

Bottom line:

Once AGAIN, we have SCIENCE taking a back seat to a POLITICAL GRAB FOR POWER, and that was all "Global Warming" was ever about.

It's a hoax, just as conservatives have been saying for 30 years.

The proof that liberals don't care about FACTS is, the evidence keeps mounting this was a hoax, and they still cling to this myth of global warming, regardless of the evidence.

And then they say Christians are the ones that believe myths?

It's also proof that global warming IS the religion of liberals.

Who was it that said take away the belief in God, and you will believe in anything?

This is a perfect example of that axiom right here.

Cue up the sputtering of hysterical enviro-wackos, I hear them coming now.

Well, if some website on the internet says it's a hoax, it must be true!!!

After all, a website could never be a hoax, right?

 

[rdean]

Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink. For some really odd reason, Republicans and conservatives complain about Democrats and liberals, but offer nothing of value. Pity.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow! Wow! Wow! LOL They lie about everything!

They say 2,500 support but its only a few dozen LOL

Warmers are fucking retards and 94% of them are Democrats

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink. For some really odd reason, Repositions and conservatives complain about Democrats and liberals, but offer nothing of value. Pity.

LOL

Settled science is neither

LOL

What a marooooon

 

[rdean]

Wow! Wow! Wow! LOL They lie about everything!

They say 2,500 support but its only a few dozen LOL

Warmers are fucking retards and 94% of the are Democrats

Scientists lie about everything? Lucky we have conservatives who know about "real things", like "Noah's Ark" and "Magical Creation".

 

[Oddball]

Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink....

6%....6%....6%....6%....
RAAAAAAAAK!

For the life of me, I still can't figure out what in hell that's supposed to mean anyways.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow! Wow! Wow! LOL They lie about everything!

They say 2,500 support but its only a few dozen LOL

Warmers are fucking retards and 94% of the are Democrats

Scientists lie about everything? Lucky we have conservatives who know about "real things", like "Noah's Ark" and "Magical Creation".

Starting your car brings the Glacier Eating CO2 Spaghetti Monster to life! Eeeeew

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Wow! Wow! Wow! LOL They lie about everything!

They say 2,500 support but its only a few dozen LOL

Warmers are fucking retards and 94% of the are Democrats

Scientists lie about everything? Lucky we have conservatives who know about "real things", like "Noah's Ark" and "Magical Creation".

Warmers lie about everything, if you could read you would have known that

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink....

6%....6%....6%....6%....
RAAAAAAAAK!

For the life of me, I still can't figure out what in hell that's supposed to mean anyways.

It means Democrats are SMART! Not like everybody says, like dumb! Democrats Scientists are SMART and they want RESPECT!

 

[L.K.Eder]

that's it. close the debate.

anonymous internet scientiest teabagsamurai has spoken.

 

[Big Fitz]

Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink. For some really odd reason, Republicans and conservatives complain about Democrats and liberals, but offer nothing of value. Pity.

Ding! Six Percent! There it is! Rdean comes through in a pinch again to parrot another worthless piece of trivia that means nothing to everyone but him

Brava!

 

[Old Rocks]

Let's see. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities agree that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. But some nitwit on the internet says it is not so. So who to believe, such difficult decisions.

 

[Old Rocks]

Is there a scientific consensus on global warming?

The skeptic argument...There is no consensus

The Petition Project features over 31,000 scientists signing the petition stating "there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere". (Petition Project)

What the science says...
That humans are causing global warming is the position of the Academies of Science from 19 countries plus many scientific organizations that study climate science. More specifically, around 95% of active climate researchers actively publishing climate papers endorse the consensus position.


Inevitably, there will be scientists who are skeptical about man-made global warming. A survey of 3146 earth scientists asked the question "Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?" (Doran 2009). More than 90% of participants had Ph.D.s, and 7% had master’s degrees. Overall, 82% of the scientists answered yes. However, what are most interesting are responses compared to the level of expertise in climate science. Of scientists who were non-climatologists and didn't publish research, 77% answered yes. In contrast, 97.5% of climatologists who actively publish research on climate change responded yes. As the level of active research and specialization in climate science increases, so does agreement that humans are significantly changing global temperatures.

 

[Big Fitz]

Let's see. All the Scientific Societies in the world, all the National Academies of Science, and all the major Universities agree that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger. But some nitwit on the internet says it is not so. So who to believe, such difficult decisions.

appeal to authority logical fallacy argument.

Just because there are a million fans out there who believe that the Detroit Lions are the best team in the NFL. This doesn't make them super bowl champions either.

Although it does make them look all the more tragically hopeless and pathetic.

 

[Old Rocks]

I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?

 

[gslack]

I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?

Are you a used car salesman?

Because the degree to which you will lie to sell this BS is astounding...

 

[westwall]

Conservatives need to keep right on denying anything that smacks of "science". After all, they have "Gawd".

6% of scientists admit to being Republican. That number will only shrink. For some really odd reason, Republicans and conservatives complain about Democrats and liberals, but offer nothing of value. Pity.

Jeez, don't you have anything new? You trot that factoid out at every opportunity and who cares? It was collectivist scientists that were caught lying. If it were a Republican scientist we would be vilifying them just as much.

 

[westwall]

I see. So we just give equal weight to the rantings of any nut on the net to that of real scientists engaged in studying the subject. And you are a schoolteacher?

old fraud,

When the scientists lie they have lost their credibility. They lied, they got caught, and they're trying to lie their way out of it. But they're not going to succeed. Get over it and go find something useful to do with your time. You are clearly passionate about the environment so find some organisation worthy of your time and your talents.

 

[Old Rocks]

Collectivist Scientists.

Walleyes, you have outdone yourself in idiocy yet one more time.