I'm sure the cons on this forum will disagree, disregard and disavow.
The Science Of Fox News: Why Its Viewers Are The Most Misinformed
The Science Of Fox News: Why Its Viewers Are The Most Misinformed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
How so?The source being Daily Kos ended the legitimacy of the story right there.
I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
Here you go.I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.
At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.
Here you go.I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.
At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.
That's what I thought, a bullshit op-ed piece. FOX does lean to the right but does have liberals on quite often. CNN rarely airs any discordant note.Here you go.I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.
At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.
Leftwing hack site.How so?The source being Daily Kos ended the legitimacy of the story right there.
The outright distortion that Fox produces has been documented countless times. As far as the MSM goes, that's a pretty large segment. Do you want to be a little more specific about which outlets of the MSM liberals trust?Here you go.I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.
At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.
You do realize his premise is based on Conservatives trust Fox, and distrust the MSM and Liberals distrust Fox, yet trust the MSM. Therefore, Conservatives are stupid.
Absolutely absurd.
The MSM airs anti-Trump stuff almost non stop while Hillary gets favorable air time. They won't cover the email or foundation scandals except for her viewpoint.The outright distortion that Fox produces has been documented countless times. As far as the MSM goes, that's a pretty large segment. Do you want to be a little more specific about which outlets of the MSM liberals trust?Here you go.I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.Oh cool... a Daily Kos piece about a book written by a leftwing hack. Yep, definitely, the science is in.
And you wonder why we just laugh at you folks.
In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.
At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.
You do realize his premise is based on Conservatives trust Fox, and distrust the MSM and Liberals distrust Fox, yet trust the MSM. Therefore, Conservatives are stupid.
Absolutely absurd.
I've seen a lot of articles on there critical of Obama, Clinton and Sanders. Maybe it's not as left wing as you assume.Leftwing hack site.How so?The source being Daily Kos ended the legitimacy of the story right there.
I'm no fan of Hillary and I've seen plenty of dirt reported on her. It certainly wasn't from her perspective either.The MSM airs anti-Trump stuff almost non stop while Hillary gets favorable air time. They won't cover the email or foundation scandals except for her viewpoint.The outright distortion that Fox produces has been documented countless times. As far as the MSM goes, that's a pretty large segment. Do you want to be a little more specific about which outlets of the MSM liberals trust?Here you go.I only see a link, no content. Post the portion that best makes your case, unless you are incapable.You don't like it so I'm guessing you didn't read any further than the first line.
In summary, then, the “science” of Fox News clearly shows that its viewers are more misinformed than the viewers of other stations, and are indeed this way for ideological reasons. But these are not necessarily the reasons that liberals may assume. Instead, the Fox “effect” probably occurs both because the station churns out falsehoods that conservatives readily accept—falsehoods that may even seem convincing to some liberals on occasion—but also because conservatives are overwhelmingly inclined to choose to watch Fox to begin with.
At the same time, it’s important to note that they’re also disinclined to watch anything else. Fox keeps constantly in their minds the idea that the rest of the media are “biased” against them, and conservatives duly respond by saying other media aren’t worth watching—it’s just a pack of lies. According to Public Policy Polling’s annual TV News Trust Poll (the 2011 run), 72 percent of conservatives say they trust Fox News, but they also say they strongly distrust NBC, ABC, CBS and CNN. Liberals and moderates, in contrast, trust all of these outlets more than they distrust them (though they distrust Fox). This, too, suggests conservative selective exposure.
You do realize his premise is based on Conservatives trust Fox, and distrust the MSM and Liberals distrust Fox, yet trust the MSM. Therefore, Conservatives are stupid.
Absolutely absurd.
Well, once in a while they have to throw something out there. That way some people can be fooled into thinking they're neutral. Sorry, but Kos is a hack site.I've seen a lot of articles on there critical of Obama, Clinton and Sanders. Maybe it's not as left wing as you assume.Leftwing hack site.How so?The source being Daily Kos ended the legitimacy of the story right there.