You have no critical thought at all. Your entire reality revolves around what the establishment tell you.
Noted. I spanked you, and you've been reduced to power-whining at me. It's nothing I haven't seen before many times.
Russia is a hostile nation that has cyberattacked the USA. Those in the USA who back Russia are traitors.
And you're claiming that the FBI, which busted its butt to put Trump in office, is now part of a conspiracy to get Trump out of office. As that conspiracy theory is hilariously stupid, everyone is now laughing at you.
Ad hominem attacks are not "spankings"
They are fallacies.
You have rebutted no arguments because your intellect is dull and you lack the ability to form all arguments of your own.
I already told you, this has nothing to do with Trump. It has to do with a lie about the "Russians."
I have already had this discussion. Many times with hyper-partisan, programmed folks like you.
It is all the same, whether it be Crepitus, McRocket, etc. You name the delusional lefty that thinks the Mueller report is legit, none of them have an argument for why prima facie evidence, which was clearly topical, and definitely more important than a raid on Cohen or Stone, yet it was excluded from investigation, why?
It was a scam, a fiction.
MISINFORMATION.
"IT IS FICTION.
Your logic makes absolutely no sense. So if Mueller is a liar, all the more reason to go read the work of a deceiver? WTF?!?
Mueller is a lying spook. He has been a spook all his life. That is his job.
The premises that the report is based on are lies. I already told you this.
It is counter intelligence propaganda. I don't know how many times I have to tell folks this.[/QUOTE]
Lol @ fiction.
You fools will believe anything if it supports your bias.[/QUOTE]
First, YOU know I am non-partisan, I have no bias. I see the establishment as corrupt. Is Trump corrupt? Sure. Is the FBI corrupt? Of course, it is in the pocket of the the establishment. And the DNC? Them too. All forces are moving ALL the players toward a policy goal.
Don't you think YOU will believe anything as well, if it will support YOUR bias?
With that said, why did the special counsel not do a thorough investigation? Why was raiding the home of Stone and Cohen more important than PROVING, conclusively that Russians did, indeed, do the deed? It wasn't, that was just a prima facie assumption. If you really know your shit, you would know there was not objective, conclusive PROOF of this.
CrowdStrike: Five Things Everyone Is Ignoring About The Russia-DNC Story
What is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired by DNC has Ties to Hillary Clinton, a Ukrainian Billionaire and Google
Intel Vets Challenge 'Russia Hack' Evidence
A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack
IOW, you are not even questioning the agenda of the spook, whose report it was, when he didn't even pursue all leads.
He has an agenda. It is YOUR partisanship, and YOUR bias that is clouding your POV on this. You hate Trump so much you are willing to throw out your progressive ethics and throw in with a
neo-con warmongering spook? Seriously?
I don't give a shit about Trump, I care about the national interest."
I never got a response to this post from Crepitus when he launched Ad hominems on my sourcing. . .if you care to. . . . You can take up the mantle.
Stop telling me to read the Muller report, Congress read it
If you wish, you can attempt one based on the ARGUMENTS. No one has yet wished to do so. They are solid.
The report is a distraction and a fiction by the establishment to create war hysteria only. Nothing will ever happen to Trump.
It is meant to get you to relinquish your internet freedoms and acquiesce on a more aggressive posture toward Russia.
BUT IT IS BASED ON LIES.
