Just when you think 9/11 Inside Nutjob couldn’t get any crazier ...
That's totally different thing. I need people to explain to me how a plane hitting the 70th floor, can cause damage to the lobby, and the basement. People were coming up from the basement of the twin towers, with burns and injuries.
I just need an explanation that is consistent with the laws of physics, and then I'll agree it was only those two planes that knocked down two towers. If you believe in science at all, then you should have questions about 9/11 to toto and all these other losers on this thread that have trolled.
As for this guy..... the situation is pretty simple to understand. California is a hot dry area, where wild fires can start easily. This has always been that way. However, they managed to make things worse by introducing a type of evergreen tree with needles. Combined with the standard procedure of putting out any fires that start as quickly as possible, eventually you get a think mat of dry needles on the ground, that burn extremely fast.
Add to that, that the public knows this, but does not want to cut down the evergreens that are creating the fuel for these wildfires.... and you have a situation that is impossible to contain. The government has said, clear trees away from your property. The public refuses. The government has said, put on stone roofs to prevent your house from burning. The public refuses.
At some point, we need to simply say that we are not going to having FEMA paying to rebuild homes. We are not going to have the State subsidize insurance. We are not going to have our fire fighters defend homes built in bad areas. And.... we are going to deregulate the insurance industry, so that prices reflect risk.
You say, why would we need to deregulate insurance? Because right now (as best I understand), California requires home owners insurance to cover fire damage in fire zones. What this means is that the insurance company has to charge everyone else a higher price, to cover home owners in fire prone areas.
Thus the fire-zone homes are able to get insurance at an affordable rate, because everyone else is paying a much higher price than they need.
If insurance was deregulated, the cost of insurance in fire zones would be high enough to cover replacing the homes.... or they would be declined on coverage completely.
Either way, this would force home owners to either choose where to build home more wisely.... or to build homes that are fire resistant.
As long as the government keeps subsidizing bad behavior, bad behavior will continue.