The Right To Bear Arms

[danielpalos]

lol. it must be implied that the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

If it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.

Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia

That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.

judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.

The People are the Militia.

The People are the Militia.

Not when the Second was written and passed.

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

 

[Auld Phart]

If it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.

Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia

That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.

judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.

The People are the Militia.

The People are the Militia.

Not when the Second was written and passed.

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

can you translate that?

 

[Cellblock2429]

The 2nd amendment is an absolute and total prohibition against any federal weapons laws or jurisdiction.
It does not matter why.
No reason has to be given, and if a reason were given, it does not have to be the only one.

lol. it must be implied that the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

If it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.

Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia

/——/ The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the right belongs to individuals for self defense, while also ruling that the right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either firearms or similar devices. State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right, per the incorporation of the Bill of Rights.Wikipedia

Judicial activism. There are no Individual terms in our Second Amendment. All terms are plural and collective.

/———/ Correct, the Constitution does not list every citizen individually by name. Joe can own a gun, Bill can speak freely, John can vote. Wowza you’re the smart one.

 

[danielpalos]

Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia

That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.

judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.

The People are the Militia.

The People are the Militia.

Not when the Second was written and passed.

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

can you translate that?

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. it must be implied that the People shall not be Infringed when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union.

If it has to be implied, it is not express. The 2nd is express.

Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia

/——/ The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the right belongs to individuals for self defense, while also ruling that the right is not unlimited and does not prohibit all regulation of either firearms or similar devices. State and local governments are limited to the same extent as the federal government from infringing this right, per the incorporation of the Bill of Rights.Wikipedia

Judicial activism. There are no Individual terms in our Second Amendment. All terms are plural and collective.

/———/ Correct, the Constitution does not list every citizen individually by name. Joe can own a gun, Bill can speak freely, John can vote. Wowza you’re the smart one.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied. Any more special pleading?

 

[Auld Phart]

That's not what the SC has ruled, and that applies.

judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.

The People are the Militia.

The People are the Militia.

Not when the Second was written and passed.

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

can you translate that?

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

 

[danielpalos]

judicial activism that has no basis in the common law.

The People are the Militia.

The People are the Militia.

Not when the Second was written and passed.

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

can you translate that?

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

 

[Auld Phart]

Not when the Second was written and passed.

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

can you translate that?

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

 

[danielpalos]

I gainsay your contention; want to argue about it?

can you translate that?

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.

 

[Auld Phart]

can you translate that?

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.

Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.

neither have squat to do with the 2nd.

 

[danielpalos]

Why do you believe the People were not the Militia upon the ratification of our federal Constitution? Our federal Civil Rights are expressly declared.

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.

Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.

neither have squat to do with the 2nd.

neither do you.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?

 

[Auld Phart]

Do you have any idea of what a militia consisted of in those days?

Males, aged 16-45, (57 in some states).

no women

no males under the age of 16.

no males over the age of 45, (57 in some states).

militia member had to be able bodied.

Which is why the Founding Fathers gave the right to bear arms to the PEOPLE.

So WOMEN could defend themselves.

So males younger than 16 or older than 45 could provide fresh meat for the family.

They couldn't join the militia, but they had need of firearms.

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.

Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.

neither have squat to do with the 2nd.

neither do you.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

You post that, but I see "The Lord is my Shepard".

Is there a chance of you coming back to Earth eventually?

 

[danielpalos]

I understand our Second Amendment is express not implied; the People may not be Infringed in the keeping and bearing of Arms, for their State or the Union.

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.

Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.

neither have squat to do with the 2nd.

neither do you.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

You post that, but I see "The Lord is my Shepard".

Is there a chance of you coming back to Earth eventually?

you need a valid argument not a diversion; floozy.

 

[Auld Phart]

When are you going to realize that makes absolutely no sense?

anybody can say that. you make no sense. see how Easy that is. only floozies should do it that way.

Bud, you might as well state "The Lord is My Shepard" instead of that.

neither have squat to do with the 2nd.

neither do you.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

Where are you getting your Individual natural rights from?

Our Constitution is Express not Implied.

You post that, but I see "The Lord is my Shepard".

Is there a chance of you coming back to Earth eventually?

you need a valid argument not a diversion; floozy.

you need a valid argument not a diversion

you need to find a mirror for that, whore.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Exactly..it expressly ties gun protections to the well regulated militia

Your statement, above, is a lie

 

[Lesh]

Daniel has become a troll.

Whatever

 

[M14 Shooter]

Thus, a lie -- or, in your case, a series of them.

How the **** do you know what I know?

You know your statement is a lie, or you argue form abject ignorance.
Tell us which.

 

[Lesh]

Your statement, above, is a lie

In your OPINION doofus.

The word "lie" has no place in a debate filled with opinion.

If I intentionally misstate facts..THAT might be a lie. Not the case however.

Get back to me when you know how to debate

 

[Thinker101]

Your statement, above, is a lie

In your OPINION doofus.

The word "lie" has no place in a debate filled with opinion.

If I intentionally misstate facts..THAT might be a lie. Not the case however.

Get back to me when you know how to debate

Yet you use the word "lie" in every other post you make...go figure.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Your statement, above, is a lie

In your OPINION doofus.

Incorrect.
You are fully aware of the fact your statement is untrue.
Thus, you lied.