The right has lost it's collective mind on it's priorities. Hunter didn't get a 'sweetheart' deal.

[westwall]

Sorry, I do not engage memes.

You don't engage in original thought either.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Incompetent rebuttal, incoherent and irrelevant.

Point on. You’re either for enforcing gun laws or not. And you can’t be for gun control and for ignoring gun laws.

 

[Billiejeens]

Donald Trump pardoned Paul Manafort for money laundering millions of dollars of ill-gotten gains in Ukraine and tax fraud.

Donald Trump pardoned Steve Bannon for stealing millions of dollars from the rubes in his We Build The Wall scam.

Donald Trump pardoned Jared Kushner's dad for illegal campaign contributions and retaliation against a witness, his own brother-in-law.

The little bitches were all perfectly okay with this, and now they dare to whine about Hunter Biden's little plea deal!!!

How DO they stand the stench of their own hypocrisy?

I didn't check your facts but,
If true it confirms the rights point not yours.
These people required pardons, your boy Hunter just skates free.
Damn you stupid.

 

[Billiejeens]

Point on. You’re either for enforcing gun laws or not. And you can’t be for gun control and for ignoring gun laws.

C'mon man
It's a Biden.

 

[Lastamender]

I keep hearing that this is double-tiered justice, that Hunter Biden's pleading guilty to a tax charge, which is a misdemeanor because it's for filing taxes late, he's getting favorable treatment.

Thousands of people file late, make payment arrangements, and never get charged.

Let's be clear, Hunter wasn't charge for tax evasion. Hunter paid his tax bill, it's just that he paid it late and underpaid. How many people are charged with filing late and paying late, even if they underpay?

Very few people are.

. I filed late and paid late, made payments. They found I owed more, they just added it to the total I owed as I continued to make montly payments which I eventually paid it off. No charges. This is true for MOST people.

In 2021, Biden paid all of the outstanding taxes he owed for 2017 and 2018, the years named in the charges. Biden wasn't charged with failure to file returns for those years. He filed returns but agreed to plead guilty to not having paid enough in both years, which was over $100,000. so, was it a miscalculation? Honest mistakes aren't necessarily criminal. I gather that rather than go through an expensive trial, a misdemeanor is something he could live with and pled out. Nixon shorted the gov $500k (in 1972 dollars) and he just paid it, no 'jail time' or charges were filed.

So, in my view, If Hunter's name were not "Biden', he most likely never would have been charged, just like they don't charge most people for filing late.

And this Idea they are being hard on Trump is also nonsense.

If his name weren't Trump he would be in jail . Document #19 on the FBI Inventory list, an S/FRD file, (Secret/Formerly Restricted Data, a nuclear secret doc) alone would do the trick for prison if anyone else had it and refused to hand it back to the government.

What Are the Classified Documents in the Trump Indictment?

What do we know, and what can we infer, about the 31 documents the special counsel's office charges Trump with retaining?

www.lawfareblog.com

S/FRD classification are one notch under the highest for nuclear secrets, which is S/RD. In order for members of the pentagon to review the documents, they had to be lowered a notch to S/FRD in order to view them, which is the only reason for the classification so do not confuse the word 'formerly' wrongfully meaning it's no longer a nuclear secret. Not true. This is a very high classification.

The bottom line is that for 5 years on investigation, the best Weiss could pin on Biden was two misdemeanors. He, like Durham, have done a lot of investigation and have little to show for it. But, to save face, they went for something anything, to justify the many years and millions of tax dollars spent. So, Weiss got 2 misdemeanors for a 5 year investigation, and Durham got 3 indictments, 2 acquittals,and the 3rd a guilty plea for something minor for a four year investigation. This is, essentially, an epic fail on both. Now both Weiss and Durham are respectable guys, I have nothing against them, but their achievements here are nothing to brag about.

And, about that "Gun charge". This is lying on the 4473 ATF background check form.

so, if you were a drug user, and you answered 'no' to this question on the 4473 form:

“Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?”

You think you would get 10 years for answering no untruthfully?

I don't think so. Maybe if there were other associated crimes, but by itself? I doubt it.

First, the odds of your getting a criminal referral for answering 'no' is practically non-existent.

If you got a criminal referral, which, in 2020, was some 433 referrals out of 27 million background checks, only 243 of those were charged, and that doesn't even tell us who was convicted.

so, how does it come to pass that he got caught?

Because he is famous. Because he is Hunter Biden.

If it were you or me, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

But, of course, it's all about Hunter Biden, a private citizen, I mean, that Jared Kushner, who was a Senior WH Advisor, got $2 billion and a $125,000,000 management fee as blood money from Mohammed Bin Salman, that far more important fact of corruption doesn't even bother you folks on the right.

Oh, but Hunter Biden, he lied on an background check form, that's something to bellyache about.

My gawd the right has lost it's mind on it's priorities.

And y'all still haven't produced any direct evidence that implicates Joe Biden in a crime of any kind.

When are you idiots going to learn people are tired of excuses from suck puppies about the dual justice system. Rationalizing everything that is done means nothing. The result is what matters.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Reread the comment. I said:

There is nothing incriminating in the message.

ANd that fact is the only fact that matters.

In short,
All the message proves is there is probably a contract between Hunter and the individual who has made a commitment to pay funds owing to some kind of contractual relationship and appears to be reneging, and, in an effort to demand the individual to honor a commitment given, Hunter is engaging in a technique called posturing (non violent intimidation via association with a powerful figure) There is NOTHING in the email that implicates Joe Biden in a crime, nor is it a criminal act in itself,

/——/ Yeah, maybe they were just settling up a bar tab. TAINT NO BIG THANG

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No need as VP.

Except he wasn’t VP in 2017

 

[Cellblock2429]

Nice dodge

I redirect your attention to the previous comment which you have thus far failed to rebut:

There was nothing incriminating in his message.

/—-/ No dodge- just another example of lying liberal hypocrisy. It’s about all you are capable of doing,

 

[Cellblock2429]

Incompetent rebuttal, incoherent and irrelevant.

/——/ Try refuting the post without using cliches.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Sorry, I do not engage memes.

/——-/ YEP, I’m laughing at you. Happy now?

 

[Rumpole]

/——-/ YEP, I’m laughing at you. Happy now?

Incompetent response, irrelevant.

 

[Rumpole]

/——/ Try refuting the post without using cliches.

1. Clearly you do not know the difference between a cliché and a boilerplate response.
2. Try refuting posts, period, as in put some work into it, a path of reasoning/logic, some examples, and substantiation with a link or two, instead of snark, lazy rhetoric, thought-terminating clichés, etc., and if you can manage that, which I sincerely doubt, you won't get a boiler plated response.
.

 

[Rumpole]

/—-/ No dodge- just another example of lying liberal hypocrisy. It’s about all you are capable of doing,

There was nothing incriminating in the text message.

THat point you have thus far failed to refute.

 

[Rumpole]

/——/ Yeah, maybe they were just settling up a bar tab. TAINT NO BIG THANG

Doesn't refute the fact that the message contains no incriminating information.

 

[Rumpole]

When are you idiots going to learn people are tired of excuses from suck puppies about the dual justice system. Rationalizing everything that is done means nothing. The result is what matters.

Your rant doesn't actually refute the premise layed out in the OP.

 

[Rumpole]

Point on. You’re either for enforcing gun laws or not. And you can’t be for gun control and for ignoring gun laws.

Your comment ignores the legal principal called 'prosecutorial discretion'.

Given that fact, your point becomes moot.

 

[Rumpole]

You don't engage in original thought either.

Says the dispenser of memes. What's next, an argument built on emojis?

In short, you are a buffoon in the debate arena.

 

[Rumpole]

Redundant, incompetent retort.

Mockery, memes, ad nauseum, in the debate arena is the province of buffoons.

You just can't help yourself.

Mediocrity becomes you.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Doesn't refute the fact that the message contains no incriminating information.

/—-/ Yeas it did. Extortion. But you keep on running defense for the Biden crooks.

 

[Auld Phart]

Doesn't refute the fact that the message contains no incriminating information.

Take your glasses off.

Maybe you can see better.