The real reason sanctuary cities are so motivated to harbor illegal Mexicans?

BrokeLoser

Diamond Member
Sep 9, 2016
40,317
22,640
2,615
MEXIFORNIA
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
Bullshit. What they want is Democrat voters. Since when did Big city mayors give a damn about crime? Their cities are all cesspools of crime.
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?
It's for Democrat votes an creation of a new victim class.
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves
he question is what do the cops have to do to make that determination? Mere suspicion is not enough to establish the "probable cause/ to stop and identify. Doing so could be expensive if a number of "suspects":turned out to be American citizens and decided to sue for harassment.
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg


She got murdered in her father's arms by an illegal..

Ban me I don't care pal... But I feel to strongly about this
 
Without sounding naive, I do believe there are many who genuinely believe they are being righteous and somehow engaging in a higher civil duty, especially those younger than say age 25. Many want to feel they are also doing something important for their generations legacy, a la those who marched during the Civil Rights movement and the like. As much as I believe this is not an equal comparison and in many ways it is an ill informed perspective, you can be sure there are those who believe this.

In a way I feel sorry for those who support these Sanctuary Cities when they haven't thought it out fully, nor appreciate the ramifications of what is by definition illegal immigration. Those who have recruited their support for reasons which are far less about philanthropy and much more about political manipulation really are beneath contempt.

We have seen such abuses of the uninformed with protests against Trump and support for socialists when they haven't considered that it is not congruent with the American system that ensured so many years of success. Yet, they blindly follow their "peers" and take their marching orders from those with ulterior motives.

As for the cities themselves, how can it be anything but political to someone holding office? If there is some more powerful spiritual motivation, it will most certainly be exposed once the choice between receiving and not receiving federal funds is placed before them.
 
Last edited:
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg


She got murdered in her father's arms by an illegal..

Ban me I don't care pal... But I feel to strongly about this

:lol:

Begging to be martyred just makes you look pathetic.

Your emotional response is irrelevant to the point.
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg

But they are - and they always will be.

It's simply a fact of the world, and always has been.
 
It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg


She got murdered in her father's arms by an illegal..

Ban me I don't care pal... But I feel to strongly about this

:lol:

Begging to be martyred just makes you look pathetic.

Your emotional response is irrelevant to the point.

She is dead, what point dont you get?

You just don't want to believe it..
 
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg


She got murdered in her father's arms by an illegal..

Ban me I don't care pal... But I feel to strongly about this

:lol:

Begging to be martyred just makes you look pathetic.

Your emotional response is irrelevant to the point.

She is dead, what point dont you get?

You just don't want to believe it..

What does the fact that she's dead have to do with the practical benefits of sanctuary policies on domestic law enforcement?

Your emotions don't trump reality.
 
:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?


The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

150706213824-san-francisco-kathryn-steinle-brother-bpr-ac-00002919-exlarge-169.jpg


She got murdered in her father's arms by an illegal..

Ban me I don't care pal... But I feel to strongly about this

:lol:

Begging to be martyred just makes you look pathetic.

Your emotional response is irrelevant to the point.

She is dead, what point dont you get?

You just don't want to believe it..

What does the fact that she's dead have to do with the practical benefits of sanctuary policies on domestic law enforcement?

Your emotions don't trump reality.

Illegals shouldn't be here in the first place

No?
 
Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.
I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.
But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

:lol:

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?
Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?
 

Forum List

Back
Top