The real reason sanctuary cities are so motivated to harbor illegal Mexicans?

[theDoctorisIn]

But they are - and they always will be.

It's simply a fact of the world, and always has been.

Pestilence exists and always has as well. So what is your point?

Which is a more effective way to deal with "pestilence" - treat the sick within the system, or exile them to die in the wilderness?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

An illegal has nothing to lose

 

[theDoctorisIn]

The illegals shouldn't be here in the first place.. Quit ducking and weaving

She got murdered in her father's arms by an illegal..

Ban me I don't care pal... But I feel to strongly about this

Begging to be martyred just makes you look pathetic.

Your emotional response is irrelevant to the point.

She is dead, what point dont you get?

You just don't want to believe it..

What does the fact that she's dead have to do with the practical benefits of sanctuary policies on domestic law enforcement?

Your emotions don't trump reality.

Illegals shouldn't be here in the first place

No?

"Shouldn't" doesn't mean anything. Your feelings are irrelevant.

They are here. They've always been here, and they always will.

There has never been a "secure" border in the history of the world.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

An illegal has nothing to lose

Nonsense. They have as much to lose as anyone else.

They have families, loved ones, possessions, desires, and goals. Just like everyone else.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Come on, let's not fall in to a desperate spin and dumb ourselves down. Jaywalking like speeding doesn't lead to six children being carried on the backs of taxpayers.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Because they shouldn't be here in the first place.. What happened to Obama's stellar performance in sending illegals home?

I thought you bragged about it?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Come on, let's not fall in to a desperate spin and dumb ourselves down. Jaywalking like speeding doesn't lead to six children being carried on the backs of taxpayers.

I love it when you guys let the racism out.

Illegally crossing an imaginary line is no more an antecedent of "children being a taxpayer burden" than being born in Kentucky with the name "Candy" is.

 

[Wyatt earp]

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

An illegal has nothing to lose

Nonsense. They have as much to lose as anyone else.

They have families, loved ones, possessions, desires, and goals. Just like everyone else.

Yet they come in this country illegally, they jump ahead of the line

 

[theDoctorisIn]

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Because they shouldn't be here in the first place.. What happened to Obama's stellar performance in sending illegals home?

I thought you bragged about it?

I think you might have been hallucinating.

I couldn't give two shits about "illegal immigrants".

 

[Wyatt earp]

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Come on, let's not fall in to a desperate spin and dumb ourselves down. Jaywalking like speeding doesn't lead to six children being carried on the backs of taxpayers.

I love it when you guys let the racism out.

Illegally crossing an imaginary line is no more an antecedent of "children being a taxpayer burden" than being born in Kentucky with the name "Candy" is.

It's not an imaginary line.. It's a border

 

[Wyatt earp]

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Because they shouldn't be here in the first place.. What happened to Obama's stellar performance in sending illegals home?

I thought you bragged about it?

I think you might have been hallucinating.

I couldn't give two shits about "illegal immigrants".

Then why you playing?

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Come on, let's not fall in to a desperate spin and dumb ourselves down. Jaywalking like speeding doesn't lead to six children being carried on the backs of taxpayers.

I love it when you guys let the racism out.

Illegally crossing an imaginary line is no more an antecedent of "children being a taxpayer burden" than being born in Kentucky with the name "Candy" is.

It's not an imaginary line.. It's a border

Same difference.

It's a line that exists not in reality, only on paper and in people's minds.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Because they shouldn't be here in the first place.. What happened to Obama's stellar performance in sending illegals home?

I thought you bragged about it?

I think you might have been hallucinating.

I couldn't give two shits about "illegal immigrants".

Then why you playing?

Because this is what I do for fun.

I should rephrase, though. For clarity.

I don't give a shit about "illegal immigration".

 

[Wyatt earp]

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Because they shouldn't be here in the first place.. What happened to Obama's stellar performance in sending illegals home?

I thought you bragged about it?

I think you might have been hallucinating.

I couldn't give two shits about "illegal immigrants".

Then why you playing?

Because this is what I do for fun.

Again you think this a game?

People died

 

[cnelsen]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

Red Herring. By that logic, there should be sanctuary cities for drugs so drug users aren't afraid to call the cops, and why not sanctuary cities for bank robbers, so they aren't afraid to call the cops. In truth, cops have discretion in making arrests, and don't arrest someone using drugs if they call to report a murder.

 

[cnelsen]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's for Democrat votes an creation of a new victim class.

And the overriding reason: to disempower the white Gentile majority.

 

[BrokeLoser]

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

I don't believe the claim can be proven and it certainly can't be quantified. I don't believe illegals call the cops now.
"What negatives?"
There are so many, that can't be a serious question?
They have many children that inherently ride the backs of American taxpayers...education, health care, then welfare and the cycle continues...Many will be incarcerated....I could go on and on.
I have friends in law enforcement here in Orange County and they are furious and embarrassed by this sanctuary city bullshit.

But you miss the point they are criminals themselves

No, I think you're the one missing the point.

Illegal immigrants are much less likely to commit violent or property crimes than American citizens - and they're also more likely to witness those crimes.

If a loved one of yours was murdered, and an illegal immigrant witnessed it - would you rather he report what he saw to the police without fear, or stay quiet as to not be deported?

Let's assume you're right. Have we reached the point where we should be so sackless to allow criminals the ability to leverage our laws?

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Come on, let's not fall in to a desperate spin and dumb ourselves down. Jaywalking like speeding doesn't lead to six children being carried on the backs of taxpayers.

I love it when you guys let the racism out.

Illegally crossing an imaginary line is no more an antecedent of "children being a taxpayer burden" than being born in Kentucky with the name "Candy" is.

Wow...you played that card rather quickly. You're stumped aren't you? You're starting to reach and lose your ability to reason....You're defaulting to emotion and nobility now. Exchanging logical views can only last so long with Lefties...It was fun while it lasted...haha

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Your ideological need for an enemy does not trump the reality on the ground.

You're a criminal. So am I. Statistically, everyone in this country violates 3-4 laws per day.

Why is this particular law so much more important to you than, say, jaywalking?

Because they shouldn't be here in the first place.. What happened to Obama's stellar performance in sending illegals home?

I thought you bragged about it?

I think you might have been hallucinating.

I couldn't give two shits about "illegal immigrants".

Then why you playing?

Because this is what I do for fun.

Again you think this a game?

People died

People die every day.

Why is it that you happen to feel so strongly about this particular person?

 

[cnelsen]

Many have tried relentlessly to use the word "immigrants" in an attempt to keep things ambiguous with hopes to package Mexican illegals in with other productive "immigrants" but let's be candid...we all know the assault on immigration is aimed right at a Mexican illegals.
I've yet to hear a logical explanation from these cities as to how or why they believe it is truly in the best interest of this country to harbor Mexican illegals.
Is the reason really political in nature?
Is it really to harvest party support?

It's entirely practical, and has little to do with politics.

Sanctuary cities don't want illegal immigrants to be afraid of calling the cops, or talking to them.

That is the claim but is it logical?
Does that notion which can't be quantified outweigh all the negatives related to illegals?

Of course it's logical - and it can certainly be quantified.

What "negatives" are you referring to? Sanctuary cities don't create illegal immigrants - they're already there.

Ask a police officer in San Francisco what they think of sanctuary policies. I think you'll be surprised.

Many cops swallow the same BS. And, hey, making arrests is work.