The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

[CowboyTed]

Average means nothing...

What you get it at and what you give it back is what matters... Trump inherited a good economy and he has increased borrowing for tax cuts for the rich...

you just don't want to know facts. amazing. wow. you can't be helped. but I will point out forever your failure at seeking out facts.

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

Why do you think Coal suffered so badly

To promote Gas you are anti Coal...

Gas increase came into the picture in spite of Obama resistance to fracking. Obama energy policy restricted coal before fracking took hold.

Pretty obvious Fracking took out Coal...

We know you have an anti-Obama agenda, Obama made fracking as safe as possible, What is your problem with making things safer. You know when you allow a company to pollute the environment, you are basically allowing them to take something without paying for it.

So you are for Companies to lobby the government so they can steal from the people?

 

[healthmyths]

Average means nothing...

What you get it at and what you give it back is what matters... Trump inherited a good economy and he has increased borrowing for tax cuts for the rich...

you just don't want to know facts. amazing. wow. you can't be helped. but I will point out forever your failure at seeking out facts.

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

He just made it as safe as possible. Fracking went on like crazy under him. It's nice to have natural resources.

Franco... do you believe everything Obama said was true?
Are these statements and actions what a President who loves our country, wants to see our country better off?
I mean for example Obama was all in favor of oil tankers carrying 1 million barrels of oil on the open ocean when a simple dry land pipeline carrying
700 barrels of oil per mile would be safer on the environment.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Average means nothing...

What you get it at and what you give it back is what matters... Trump inherited a good economy and he has increased borrowing for tax cuts for the rich...

you just don't want to know facts. amazing. wow. you can't be helped. but I will point out forever your failure at seeking out facts.

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

He just made it as safe as possible. Fracking went on like crazy under him. It's nice to have natural resources.

Franco... do you believe everything Obama said was true?
Are these statements and actions what a President who loves our country, wants to see our country better off?
I mean for example Obama was all in favor of oil tankers carrying 1 million barrels of oil on the open ocean when a simple dry land pipeline carrying
700 barrels of oil per mile would be safer on the environment.
View attachment 299957

Get rid of this bad math already.
It is impossible to reduce leases by 177%.

 

[healthmyths]

you just don't want to know facts. amazing. wow. you can't be helped. but I will point out forever your failure at seeking out facts.

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

He just made it as safe as possible. Fracking went on like crazy under him. It's nice to have natural resources.

Franco... do you believe everything Obama said was true?
Are these statements and actions what a President who loves our country, wants to see our country better off?
I mean for example Obama was all in favor of oil tankers carrying 1 million barrels of oil on the open ocean when a simple dry land pipeline carrying
700 barrels of oil per mile would be safer on the environment.
View attachment 299957

View attachment 299960

Get rid of this bad math already.
It is impossible to reduce leases by 177%.

You are right! Thanks to you I found another link that shows Obama's gross malfeasance regarding our country!
Note it is 17% reduction in federal land leases from Bush and also the article I quoted showed Obama shut down 30 coal production facilities because
he was and still is anti-business.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

you just don't want to know facts. amazing. wow. you can't be helped. but I will point out forever your failure at seeking out facts.

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

Why do you think Coal suffered so badly

To promote Gas you are anti Coal...

Gas increase came into the picture in spite of Obama resistance to fracking. Obama energy policy restricted coal before fracking took hold.

Pretty obvious Fracking took out Coal...

We know you have an anti-Obama agenda, Obama made fracking as safe as possible, What is your problem with making things safer. You know when you allow a company to pollute the environment, you are basically allowing them to take something without paying for it.

So you are for Companies to lobby the government so they can steal from the people?

Obama opposed fracking! Period.

 

[CowboyTed]

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

Why do you think Coal suffered so badly

To promote Gas you are anti Coal...

Gas increase came into the picture in spite of Obama resistance to fracking. Obama energy policy restricted coal before fracking took hold.

Pretty obvious Fracking took out Coal...

We know you have an anti-Obama agenda, Obama made fracking as safe as possible, What is your problem with making things safer. You know when you allow a company to pollute the environment, you are basically allowing them to take something without paying for it.

So you are for Companies to lobby the government so they can steal from the people?

Obama opposed fracking! Period.

Don't let actual evidence that makes you look stupid stop you.

President Obama's climate change legacy is clouded by his support of fracking

Obama believed in responsible fracking.... It involved safe guards for protecting the water table... But fracking from an economic issues seemed to have no problem with it...

You seem to be for pollution which scientifically means you want to kill Americans or don't care if they live or die..
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Why don't you just say it, you believe Americans should die for corporation profits.

 

[CowboyTed]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

Wow!

When you compare the first fake number to the second fake number, the drop is significant!!

 

[CowboyTed]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

Wow!

When you compare the first fake number to the second fake number, the drop is significant!!

Well it is up to you to prove them fake...

Here let me help...

Here is the peer reviewed paper published on the data collected:
Fine particulate matter damages and value added in the US economy

Now with you expertise you can give us the scientific holes which haven't been pointed out by other experts in the field.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

Wow!

When you compare the first fake number to the second fake number, the drop is significant!!

Well it is up to you to prove them fake...

Here let me help...

Here is the peer reviewed paper published on the data collected:
Fine particulate matter damages and value added in the US economy

Now with you expertise you can give us the scientific holes which haven't been pointed out by other experts in the field.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

Well, I wouldn't say these fake numbers were created without any actual evidence...….

The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Estimates...90%
Estimates 100,000 premature deaths
Estimates 6% of GDP in 2008
Estimates 4% of GDP in 2014

Looks very rigorous to me. How could I have ever doubted?
They're right, we have to stop raising dust while farming.

 

[CowboyTed]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

Wow!

When you compare the first fake number to the second fake number, the drop is significant!!

Well it is up to you to prove them fake...

Here let me help...

Here is the peer reviewed paper published on the data collected:
Fine particulate matter damages and value added in the US economy

Now with you expertise you can give us the scientific holes which haven't been pointed out by other experts in the field.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

Well, I wouldn't say these fake numbers were created without any actual evidence...….

The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Estimates...90%
Estimates 100,000 premature deaths
Estimates 6% of GDP in 2008
Estimates 4% of GDP in 2014

Looks very rigorous to me. How could I have ever doubted?
They're right, we have to stop raising dust while farming.

Apart from just trying to sprinkle doubt have you got any actual evidence. Why are you so anti-American... The story is about how US Citizens lives were saved and the Economy does a lot better because of it... Why are you so Anti-American?

 

[jc456]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

Wow!

When you compare the first fake number to the second fake number, the drop is significant!!

Well it is up to you to prove them fake...

Here let me help...

Here is the peer reviewed paper published on the data collected:
Fine particulate matter damages and value added in the US economy

Now with you expertise you can give us the scientific holes which haven't been pointed out by other experts in the field.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

Well, I wouldn't say these fake numbers were created without any actual evidence...….

The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Estimates...90%
Estimates 100,000 premature deaths
Estimates 6% of GDP in 2008
Estimates 4% of GDP in 2014

Looks very rigorous to me. How could I have ever doubted?
They're right, we have to stop raising dust while farming.

Apart from just trying to sprinkle doubt have you got any actual evidence. Why are you so anti-American... The story is about how US Citizens lives were saved and the Economy does a lot better because of it... Why are you so Anti-American?

you must have missed the word 'estimates' guess what that word means?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

Wow!

When you compare the first fake number to the second fake number, the drop is significant!!

Well it is up to you to prove them fake...

Here let me help...

Here is the peer reviewed paper published on the data collected:
Fine particulate matter damages and value added in the US economy

Now with you expertise you can give us the scientific holes which haven't been pointed out by other experts in the field.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

You see you blurt out 'fake' all you like but you are now accusing someone without any actual evidence.

Well, I wouldn't say these fake numbers were created without any actual evidence...….

The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Estimates...90%
Estimates 100,000 premature deaths
Estimates 6% of GDP in 2008
Estimates 4% of GDP in 2014

Looks very rigorous to me. How could I have ever doubted?
They're right, we have to stop raising dust while farming.

Apart from just trying to sprinkle doubt have you got any actual evidence. Why are you so anti-American... The story is about how US Citizens lives were saved and the Economy does a lot better because of it... Why are you so Anti-American?

Apart from just trying to sprinkle doubt have you got any actual evidence.

You mean more evidence than the 4 estimates stacked on top of each other in that paper?

The story is about how US Citizens lives were saved and the Economy does a lot better because of it...

Fracking is awesome!!! I'm so glad Obama failed to kill it like he wanted.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Obama's great work at reducing pollution that is killing Americans.

"
Utilities had damaged the economy most through the emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2), which can harm the lungs directly or combine with ammonia to form particulate matter. The EPA estimates that PM 2.5—the deadliest particulate matter—is responsible for 90 percent of the 100,000 premature deaths caused by air pollution annually in the U.S.

Premature death carries a significant social cost, and Azevedo and her colleagues calculated the reduction in gross external damages from air pollution across the economy. (They did not assess some other forms of economic damage, such as climate damage.)

Damage to the economy from emissions dropped from $1 trillion to $719 billion from 2008 to 2014, Azevedo said.

“This is not trivial. These damages would correspond to something like 6% of GDP in 2008. And they are down to a little bit over 4% in 2014. So the good news is that through 2014, the U.S. economy continues to be on its path to be less pollution-intensive, and with lower consequences.”"
When U.S. Emissions Dropped, Mortality Dropped Dramatically

When Obama energy policy took hold people in third world countries died from starvation as a result.

 

[U2Edge]

The monthly unemployment rate for January 2020 was 3.6%. This is the 37th unemployment report with Trump in office, his 37th month recorded for this list. This brings Trump's average unemployment rate for his term in office to date, down from 3.97% in December 2019 to 3.96% in January 2020.

The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

Gerald Ford: 7.77%

Average Unemployment Rates for US Presidents since after World War II:

01. Donald Trump: 3.96%
02. Lyndon Johnson: 4.19%
03. Harry Truman: 4.26%
04. Dwight Eisenhower: 4.89%
05. Richard Nixon: 5.00%
06. Bill Clinton: 5.20%
07. George W. Bush: 5.27%
08. John Kennedy: 5.98%
09. George H.W. Bush: 6.30%
10. Jimmy Carter: 6.54%
11. Barack Obama: 7.45%
12. Ronald Reagan: 7.54%
13. Gerald Ford: 7.77%



There are 11 months left in Trumps first Presidential term, assuming he completes it.

The labor force participation rate is at 63.4% for January 2020, an increase from 63.2% in December 2019.

 

[U2Edge]

The monthly unemployment rate for February 2020 was 3.5%. This is the 38th unemployment report with Trump in office, his 38th month recorded for this list. This brings Trump's average unemployment rate for his term in office to date, down from 3.96% in January 2019 to 3.95% in February 2020.

The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

Gerald Ford: 7.77%

Average Unemployment Rates for US Presidents since after World War II:

01. Donald Trump: 3.95%
02. Lyndon Johnson: 4.19%
03. Harry Truman: 4.26%
04. Dwight Eisenhower: 4.89%
05. Richard Nixon: 5.00%
06. Bill Clinton: 5.20%
07. George W. Bush: 5.27%
08. John Kennedy: 5.98%
09. George H.W. Bush: 6.30%
10. Jimmy Carter: 6.54%
11. Barack Obama: 7.45%
12. Ronald Reagan: 7.54%
13. Gerald Ford: 7.77%



There are 10 months left in Trumps first Presidential term, assuming he completes it.

The labor force participation rate is at 63.4% for February 2020, the same as it was in January 2020.

 

[U2Edge]

The monthly unemployment rate for March 2020 was 4.4%. This is the 39th unemployment report with Trump in office, his 39th month recorded for this list. This brings Trump's average unemployment rate for his term in office to date, up from 3.95% in February 2019 to 3.96% in March 2020.

The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

Gerald Ford: 7.77%

Average Unemployment Rates for US Presidents since after World War II:

01. Donald Trump: 3.96%
02. Lyndon Johnson: 4.19%
03. Harry Truman: 4.26%
04. Dwight Eisenhower: 4.89%
05. Richard Nixon: 5.00%
06. Bill Clinton: 5.20%
07. George W. Bush: 5.27%
08. John Kennedy: 5.98%
09. George H.W. Bush: 6.30%
10. Jimmy Carter: 6.54%
11. Barack Obama: 7.45%
12. Ronald Reagan: 7.54%
13. Gerald Ford: 7.77%



There are 9 months left in Trumps first Presidential term, assuming he completes it.

The labor force participation rate is at 62.7% for March 2020, down from 63.4% in February 2020.

 

[IM2]

Are you really serious? trump was handed declining unemployment, record job growth, and full employment. C'mon folks we have to be more detailed here. Unemployment was 4.7 percent when trump took office I mean, can we get real? It fell by a point during his time and that wasn't because of anything he has done.

Obama was handed a dying economy and yet you want to contrast the numbers with trump when for most of this presidency trump has rode on Obamas economic work.

I know most of you guys here want to re elect trump, I don't know what for except for one thing, and that is just sad.

 

[Camp]

The monthly unemployment rate for March 2020 was 4.4%. This is the 39th unemployment report with Trump in office, his 39th month recorded for this list. This brings Trump's average unemployment rate for his term in office to date, up from 3.95% in February 2019 to 3.96% in March 2020.

The President with the worst average unemployment rate since World War II is?

Gerald Ford: 7.77%

Average Unemployment Rates for US Presidents since after World War II:

01. Donald Trump: 3.96%
02. Lyndon Johnson: 4.19%
03. Harry Truman: 4.26%
04. Dwight Eisenhower: 4.89%
05. Richard Nixon: 5.00%
06. Bill Clinton: 5.20%
07. George W. Bush: 5.27%
08. John Kennedy: 5.98%
09. George H.W. Bush: 6.30%
10. Jimmy Carter: 6.54%
11. Barack Obama: 7.45%
12. Ronald Reagan: 7.54%
13. Gerald Ford: 7.77%



There are 9 months left in Trumps first Presidential term, assuming he completes it.

The labor force participation rate is at 62.7% for March 2020, down from 63.4% in February 2020.

How will the unemployment rates over the rest of the year impact Rrumps average?

 

[IM2]

Average means nothing...

What you get it at and what you give it back is what matters... Trump inherited a good economy and he has increased borrowing for tax cuts for the rich...

you just don't want to know facts. amazing. wow. you can't be helped. but I will point out forever your failure at seeking out facts.

What do you mean... I accepted the average but pointed out that it is pretty meaning less. Unemployment is what was it when you got (the day you implemented something) and what you gave it back at, not the average while you were getting it there...

Obama got high and going higher and gave it back real low... Obama got it while it was on the way to 10% and he turned on that when his policies started to kick in and gave it back (i.e. when Trump's policies started to kick in) at 4.0% (I could say lower as Trump did effectively nothing for the first 10 months of office on the economy).

Today Unemployment is 3.5%, So Trump has really only improved it by .5% while increasing borrowing to $1 trillion.


Note:
I will just point out that the Germany economy is meant to be going into recession, They have an unemployment rate 3.1%(US: 3.5%) and surplus of 1.2% of GDP (US: 5.5% deficit). As a recession note, the res of the world is preparing for one, it is due. Trumpnomics is trying to keep borrowing to prolong it but that just means US will just crash harder.

Obama’s energy policy caused unemployment. No improvement began until after fracking — which Obama opposed.

He just made it as safe as possible. Fracking went on like crazy under him. It's nice to have natural resources.

Franco... do you believe everything Obama said was true?
Are these statements and actions what a President who loves our country, wants to see our country better off?
I mean for example Obama was all in favor of oil tankers carrying 1 million barrels of oil on the open ocean when a simple dry land pipeline carrying
700 barrels of oil per mile would be safer on the environment.
View attachment 299957

Manufacturing is in a recession right now and trump did not bring back manufacturing jobs. Most of those decisions were made before trump took office.

Obama did not lie over 16,000 times in 8 years much less the 4 we have had under trump., trump does not love America. But what you say about Obama fits right in with the racist narrative. He wasn't America, he hates America. You white racists don't get it because none of your asses have to live as black people. Obama loved this country more than any of you. He put his life out there on the line literally. Because there were all kinds of rumors about Obama getting shot and whites were the ones telling me this. So what kind of man would fabricate his birth to run for office in a country where he might get killed? You fucking white idiots.