The President is proposing to pay women to have children

[EvilCat Breath]

No women are paid to have children.

 

[Moonglow]

No women are paid to have children.

Not yet, if the socialist have their way, they will.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Not yet, if the socialist have their way, they will.

If democrats have their way women will get pregnant to sell their newborns to organ farms.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Not a fan of more teen mothers and more welfare moms having kids for a "signing" bonus. This is idea needs a lot of work imo.

Actually this will not do much to change the mind of most folks on either side of the argument, in fact if anything it will probably convince more white woman/couples than any other group to keep their baby as white liberal groups will still be trying to convince minorities to abort.

 

[Billiejeens]

Actually this will not do much to change the mind of most folks on either side of the argument, in fact if anything it will probably convince more white woman/couples than any other group to keep their baby as white liberal groups will still be trying to convince minorities to abort.

PP and gang violence are the only things that keep the herd at a manageable level.

 

[IDIOCRACY]

There’s a long history of some political voices accusing Black women of having children primarily for welfare benefits, often using this stereotype to justify restricting assistance. Now, with the proposed “baby bonus” policy from the Trump administration to encourage higher birth rates, the government is being asked to incentivize childbirth for the broader population.

It’s interesting to see how public attitudes toward government support for families can shift depending on which groups are perceived to benefit. Policies that were once stigmatized as “handouts” are now reframed as necessary incentives, reflecting deeper anxieties about changing demographics in America.

The push for women to have more children has a powerful ally: Trump​

The White House is emerging as a powerful ally of the burgeoning movement of people who want women to have more children, but there's little emphasis on the unique level of danger that birth poses in the U.S.

Why it matters: The U.S. population is aging, presenting complex economic and health care challenges that "pro-natalists" argue should be addressed through raising fertility rates. At the same time, the country is facing an ongoing maternal mortality crisis and a politically fraught debate over women's reproductive health that's had widespread ripple effects.

• The pro-natalist movement is splintered into factions with different views, including some with restrictive definitions of what constitutes a family. There's also infighting over exactly how women should be reproducing — with debate around IVF and genetic screening.
• Some of its most controversial adherents hold racist views that encouraging white people to have more babies could help maintain the race's stability.

https://www.axios.com/2025/04/22/trump-women-children-natalist-movement

You sure that applies to the black population too? My friend's friend's cousin's mother is asking..

 

[Billiejeens]

This is considered a "gift" and subject to something near 50% tax, so have a baby for $2500.00.

How monumentally stupid a proposal is this? If it were someone in your city government proposing this idea you would consider him/her unfit and ask for a recall election. The thing is, if you did some digging you would have found this hypothetical person unfit and possibly never elected them.

But not for Trump. He got re-elected.

Do you know the SS had a breeding center for women to have children to advance the race? Don't tell me that Trump wants blacks and Hispanics to have more children.

Why not?

 

[initforme]

Kids should not be something one is bribed to have. Seems wrong.