Few of my posts generate more negative evaluations, even hostility, than does my belief that the Democrats goals/intentions are to achieve essentially a totalitarian government. They are working to exercise and retain total unchallenged power without consequence. Few of my fellow Patriots dare wade in on any discussion of that concept.
It is therefore reassuring to me when somebody else sees and evaluates the same phenomenon as I do. Jacob Siegel sees and acknowledges the same dishonesty/dangerous methods the Democrats are using to do accomplish their end game.
Jacob Siegel is hardly anybody's idea of a right wing nutjob as most publications he has worked/written for are left of center, even hard left of center. But it turns out he is a journalist after all and his essay linked here is both interesting, provocative, and justifiable.
He documents a great many of the anomalies and dirty tricks we at USMB have been debating over the past year(s) and it is the Democrats who come under his critical scrutiny. The take home paragraph (emphasis mine):
". . .All of which is to say that current efforts to manipulate the American electoral system are not subtle or restricted to working around the law. The Democratic Party’s strategy to win the presidency in 2024 hinges in large part on preventing a normal election from taking place. Procedural and voting irregularities that would have triggered alarm across the political spectrum until recently have become an accepted feature of the landscape. The party has pursued this strategy since 2016, when the Obama White House and the Hillary Clinton campaign worked with U.S. intelligence agencies to frame Trump falsely as a Russian agent. The strategy aims to preserve the ceremony of voting, while constraining its influence, in the same way ideologically motivated bans on “hate” and “misinformation” uphold the appearance of a right to speak, while dictating what can or can’t be said. . ."
And he concludes:
". . .But the damage the party-state is inflicting to the republic in the meantime is massive and should worry all Americans, regardless of their partisan identifications—as RFK Jr. discovered when he sought to challenge Biden for the 2024 Democratic nomination and found himself facing media smears and extensive litigation to keep him off the ballot. Green Party candidate Jill Stein has faced similar ballot opposition. Support for the legitimacy of our political institutions is eroding. . ."
And without stating what he hopes is the outcome he closes with:
". . .Still, the race has already undergone two dramatic shifts in less than two months—once after Trump survived the July 13 attempt on his life, and again when Harris revived her party’s flagging fortunes. American voters may yet have their say."
www.city-journal.org
It is therefore reassuring to me when somebody else sees and evaluates the same phenomenon as I do. Jacob Siegel sees and acknowledges the same dishonesty/dangerous methods the Democrats are using to do accomplish their end game.
Jacob Siegel is hardly anybody's idea of a right wing nutjob as most publications he has worked/written for are left of center, even hard left of center. But it turns out he is a journalist after all and his essay linked here is both interesting, provocative, and justifiable.
He documents a great many of the anomalies and dirty tricks we at USMB have been debating over the past year(s) and it is the Democrats who come under his critical scrutiny. The take home paragraph (emphasis mine):
". . .All of which is to say that current efforts to manipulate the American electoral system are not subtle or restricted to working around the law. The Democratic Party’s strategy to win the presidency in 2024 hinges in large part on preventing a normal election from taking place. Procedural and voting irregularities that would have triggered alarm across the political spectrum until recently have become an accepted feature of the landscape. The party has pursued this strategy since 2016, when the Obama White House and the Hillary Clinton campaign worked with U.S. intelligence agencies to frame Trump falsely as a Russian agent. The strategy aims to preserve the ceremony of voting, while constraining its influence, in the same way ideologically motivated bans on “hate” and “misinformation” uphold the appearance of a right to speak, while dictating what can or can’t be said. . ."
And he concludes:
". . .But the damage the party-state is inflicting to the republic in the meantime is massive and should worry all Americans, regardless of their partisan identifications—as RFK Jr. discovered when he sought to challenge Biden for the 2024 Democratic nomination and found himself facing media smears and extensive litigation to keep him off the ballot. Green Party candidate Jill Stein has faced similar ballot opposition. Support for the legitimacy of our political institutions is eroding. . ."
And without stating what he hopes is the outcome he closes with:
". . .Still, the race has already undergone two dramatic shifts in less than two months—once after Trump survived the July 13 attempt on his life, and again when Harris revived her party’s flagging fortunes. American voters may yet have their say."
The Plot to Manage Democracy
Elites are building a system to control and constrain Americans’ self-expression and political freedom.
www.city-journal.org
Last edited:
