The mules could be IDd. Lets start there. Dominions machines need to be forensiclly audited no excuses. The ballots should be able to be viewed at once. No stalling, results.
Are you talking about 2020 or these most recent elections?
No, conservatives propagating lies about ‘cheating’ and ‘fraud’ are the real danger to democracy.
How about good-bye. I am not spending the evening answering your stupid questions. Find someone else to play with.
No it’s not going to happen… there’s no reason for it to happen. Sane people have moved on from 2020 and aren’t going to give credence to your lies and conspiracies
Don't apologize, you are right to question it.
www.marketwatch.com
Not assuming anything.
I provided numbers and a link for my claim. Feel free to do the same.
I’m not playing. I asked a legit question
The conservative Heritage Foundation did their own deep dive into voter fraud. The result? They collected a record of 1300 cases in FOUR DECADES. Not only that, but that 1300 wasn’t even limited to national elections. That 1300 encompassed cases ranging to city elections as well.
False it wasn’t a deep dive, you hack lying bitch propagandist retard. They complex a list of arrests and prosecutions. If your retarded enough to believe that the only ones that have ever occurred were the ones that have been caught and prosecuted than your even more tragically retarded than you’ve come across.
Face it. You’re an utterly unpersuasive fucktard lying rancid donkey twat.
You've underestimated how much democrats, never trumpers and independents wanted that Liar n Cheat gone....
Lol I don’t need to provide my own numbers because I can explain how your numbers need to be read along the lines. Lexalt and Masters both LOST. Therefore your narrative about tossups is way out dated and wrong.Don't apologize, you are right to question it.
Happy to provide them:
Here's how candidates endorsed by Trump performed in the midterm elections
Former President Donald Trump endorsed 187 congressional candidates who appeared on the ballot Tuesday. Here's how their races are going.
Here's some numbers from Marketwatch.com, having compiled them from the AP:
(I edited down to the numbers only, taking out any spin)
A total of 25 Senate candidates and 162 House candidates endorsed by former President Donald Trump were on the ballot in the Nov. 8 midterm elections.
Among Trump’s Senate endorsees, the Associated Press has declared 17 winners.
For non-math nerds, that is 68%, more than 2/3 of his Senate endorsees already declared winners.
Three tossup Senate races have not yet been called by the AP. In each of those races, the Republican candidates were endorsed by Trump: Blake Masters in Arizona, Herschel Walker in Georgia and Adam Laxalt in Nevada. Laxalt currently leads by 3 points, with 75% of the vote reported, and Masters trails by 5 points, with 68% reported.
Assuming a Laxalt win* and a Masters loss, that is 18 winners out of 25, for 72% of Trump Senate endorsees winning.
On the House side, Trump-endorsed candidates broadly performed well: 141 of the 162 endorsed candidates had been deemed election winners by AP as of Wednesday afternoon.
141 out of 162 is 87% of Trump-backed candidates for the House winning. Not sure why Marketwatch felt the need to add the "broadly" as a qualifier.
If my junior high math is right, that is 84% of Trump-endorsed congressional candidates winning. I have to admit, that I was buying into the "bad night for Trump" spin. A Trump endorsement, statistically, was the best predictor of a win.
*In fact, I don't assume a Laxalt win. Dems are desperate to maintain the Senate and ram through their agenda. I predict shenanigans in Nevada, a state already not known for its dedication to honesty and hard work.
Not assuming anything.
I'm stating facts with numbers to back them up. Spin aside, 84% of Trump-backed candidates won. If 84% of congressional races were "non-competitive," you should have a dim view of your own party's ability to be competitive.
I provided numbers and a link for my claim. Feel free to do the same.
You are more likely basing your claim on headlines like these:
View attachment 724956
View attachment 724957
View attachment 724958
You really should stop trusting these headlines that appear to tell the whole story so you don't fact-check them. They are putting one over on you.
Hey idiot unless you provide real numbers for evidence, you’re just noise. No one wants to hear noise.
Good. So stfu from now on.
Well, you failed.
Yeah, he's still hanging around...
www.nbcbayarea.com
You got one thing right… you’re playing a game
Actual police video would be fine but that’s not what you posted. So we have an article referring to a source who said they saw the video and it contradicts what was reported. Is that correct?Is actual police video okay for you?
Body Cam Video Shows Paul Pelosi Opened Door for Police, Despite DOJ Saying Otherwise: Source
The NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit spoke with a source familiar with the Pelosi investigation, who personally viewed body camera video recorded by officers responding to the Pelosi’s San Francisco home.
Are you serious? Read the news of any city and you'll see. Do you think George Floyd was that rare? The media tells us what's news and what isn't, and the media is told what to blow up and what to ignore. We live in a political world. What did Obama do when he needed to arouse the Democrat base? He took an obscure story and blew it up and made it national, Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. When does any President bother with a local matter like that? They don't, but he did. Why?
