the people were right again: looks like there were 2 shooters that killed JFK

The more time passes--the more you never figure something out.
 
Warren Reynolds, a used car salesman who saw the gunman escaping west on Jefferson Boulevard, was indeed hurt—and very badly. Reynolds told news reporters the afternoon of the assassination that he had seen the fleeing gunman, but was simply too far away to have made a positive identification. The FBI finally got around to interviewing Reynolds in January, 1964, at which time the witness reiterated his original story that he had been located across Jefferson Boulevard and was simply too far from the gunman to have made a positive identification. Two nights later, someone sneaked into Reynolds’ place of business, hid in the basement, and shot Mr. Reynolds in the head with a .22 caliber rifle. Miraculously, Reynolds survived. Even more miraculously, the car salesman made such a dramatic recovery that he now found his eyesight had improved and he was able to identify Lee Oswald after all. (Hurt, pp. 147-48; McBride pp. 476-78)

Decades later, Dallas researcher Michael Brownlow tracked down Mr. Reynolds, who was still in the business of selling cars. At first, Reynolds would not admit who he was. But after Brownlow had gained his trust, the researcher asked Mr. Reynolds why he had suddenly changed his testimony regarding his identification of Oswald.

“Because I wanted to live,” Reynolds admitted bluntly.
A 22 rifle was the tool of choice for Malcolm Wallace, LBJ's enforcer who was a convicted murderer and the investigator that was about to indict LBJ for swindling was shot 5 times with a bolt action rifle in Texas when he was in the Senate, but was ruled a suicide. Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Not true

Warren Reynolds was shot in the head and survived. The claim that he changed his testimony and refused to ID Oswald is rumor with basis in fact or foundation
 
Warren Reynolds, a used car salesman who saw the gunman escaping west on Jefferson Boulevard, was indeed hurt—and very badly. Reynolds told news reporters the afternoon of the assassination that he had seen the fleeing gunman, but was simply too far away to have made a positive identification. The FBI finally got around to interviewing Reynolds in January, 1964, at which time the witness reiterated his original story that he had been located across Jefferson Boulevard and was simply too far from the gunman to have made a positive identification. Two nights later, someone sneaked into Reynolds’ place of business, hid in the basement, and shot Mr. Reynolds in the head with a .22 caliber rifle. Miraculously, Reynolds survived. Even more miraculously, the car salesman made such a dramatic recovery that he now found his eyesight had improved and he was able to identify Lee Oswald after all. (Hurt, pp. 147-48; McBride pp. 476-78)

Decades later, Dallas researcher Michael Brownlow tracked down Mr. Reynolds, who was still in the business of selling cars. At first, Reynolds would not admit who he was. But after Brownlow had gained his trust, the researcher asked Mr. Reynolds why he had suddenly changed his testimony regarding his identification of Oswald.

“Because I wanted to live,” Reynolds admitted bluntly.
A 22 rifle was the tool of choice for Malcolm Wallace, LBJ's enforcer who was a convicted murderer and the investigator that was about to indict LBJ for swindling was shot 5 times with a bolt action rifle in Texas when he was in the Senate, but was ruled a suicide. Why Officer Tippit Stopped His Killer
Completely misleading and wrong

When he did nto refuse to ID Oswald to reporters. He simply did not know who Oswald was at that time and could not ID him. It was immediately after the shooting of Tibbets. Later when he knew who Oswald was like everyone else he easily identified him

His own shooting was unrelated
 
I'm not sure we ever had a firm grip on the Truth here, at least recently. To believe the Warren story you have to either be able to disregard a lot of witnesses and medical and photographic evidence, or just want very badly to believe. Even a casual look see should at least make you want to look a little deeper. You don't want to do that if you'rd good with what you have. No harm done either way, but it matters to some people because it is still afflicting us today, though you may not see it that way.
 

The classic reason why to not trust big government, as Democrats do.

rightwinger … you bought a clear hoax that was the Warren Commission. It looks like you were duped, despite the clear evidence that should have made you question it already.

The people deserve to know what their government does. It’s crazy that this is now a partisan issue.
This dumb shit again...
 
I'm not sure we ever had a firm grip on the Truth here, at least recently. To believe the Warren story you have to either be able to disregard a lot of witnesses and medical and photographic evidence, or just want very badly to believe. Even a casual look see should at least make you want to look a little deeper. You don't want to do that if you'rd good with what you have. No harm done either way, but it matters to some people because it is still afflicting us today, though you may not see it that way.
No you do not

Most od the crap about evidence and witnesses was dreamed up and not valid
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom