The Party that LOVES to Tout and Claim The Constitution as Their Very Own

[MarcATL]

Is pretty much guilty of never living up to it's ideals....



Why is that?

 

[Darkwind]

They get far closer to it then the left does. No one is perfect or lives up to every ideal.

But then, you'd hold the Republicans to an exacting standard while giving a pass to everything the left does. Including murder.

 

[Rambunctious]

Dems hate the constitution...and the bill of rights....they can't have forced socialism with it still intact....

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Good question.

And what's with all those Democrat calls for gun bans, and speech restrictions in college campuses, and driving religion from public discourse?

 

[bripat9643]

Is pretty much guilty of never living up to it's ideals....



Why is that?

Dims live up to their ideals?

 

[JoeMoma]

Is pretty much guilty of never living up to it's ideals....



Why is that?

He is full of shit.

 

[Correll]

Is pretty much guilty of never living up to it's ideals....



Why is that?

We never claim the constitution was ours. Anyone that would say that, is a fucking moron not worth listening to.

 

[Richard-H]

If people lived up to them they wouldn't be called "ideals", they'd be called "the way things are".

 

[MarcATL]

If people lived up to them they wouldn't be called "ideals", they'd be called "the way things are".

Interesting twist.

 

[MarcATL]

Good question.

And what's with all those Democrat calls for gun bans, and speech restrictions in college campuses, and driving religion from public discourse?

I'm constantly talking about how good God is. And I'm a liberal.

Could it be you're lying again?

 

[Correll]

If people lived up to them they wouldn't be called "ideals", they'd be called "the way things are".

i'm doing pretty good on my "taking responsibility" ideal.

Perfect? NO. Great? I think that would be pretty fair, looking at how well I am taking care of my responsibilities to those close to me.

 

[BS Filter]

If people lived up to them they wouldn't be called "ideals", they'd be called "the way things are".

Interesting twist.

The purpose of the Constitution is to restrain government, not the rights of citizens. That's what the left can't comprehend.

 

[MarcATL]

So far none of the usual USMB die-hard Republicans haven't objected to the OP's premise, just offering various excuses for it.

Not bad, not bad at all.

 

[Correll]

So far none of the usual USMB die-hard Republicans haven't objected to the OP's premise, just offering various excuses for it.

Not bad, not bad at all.

I've rejected it. We never say that. Your thread title is a lie. Your premise is stupid. And a lie. A stupid lie.

 

[MarcATL]

I've rejected it. We never say that. Your thread title is a lie. Your premise is stupid. And a lie. A stupid lie.

An exception to the rule and an example of the fringiest of the fringe is all that proves you to be. No surprise there.

 

[JoeMoma]

So far none of the usual USMB die-hard Republicans haven't objected to the OP's premise, just offering various excuses for it.

Not bad, not bad at all.

He is full of shit.

 

[MarcATL]

He is full of shit.

Actually, I think that would be, uh, you.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Good question.

And what's with all those Democrat calls for gun bans, and speech restrictions in college campuses, and driving religion from public discourse?

I'm constantly talking about how good God is. And I'm a liberal.

Could it be you're lying again?

No, it couldn't. Not a first time either.

 

[Correll]

I've rejected it. We never say that. Your thread title is a lie. Your premise is stupid. And a lie. A stupid lie.

An exception to the rule and an example of the fringiest of the fringe is all that proves you to be. No surprise there.

They are wrong to allow you to define the debate. Your premise is completely wrong. Our position of caring about, or wanting to "conserve" the Constitution is not "claiming it to be ours".


That you ignore their points and just gloat about them not denying your premise, shows that you know you were being deceptive.


A common problem on the right, is to assume good faith in other people. They are projecting.


i don't dot hat with libs any more. I try to assume that you are always lying with ill intent.


It is more often true than not.

 

[JoeMoma]

He is full of shit.

Actually, I think that would be, uh, you.

Of course you do. I'm actually pleased by that you THINK that.

Obviously, if I think the speaker in the video is full of shit, then I most probably object to the OP's premise. Somehow you missed that.