The Only Black GOP Senator senator delivers speech on policing and race

[Syriusly]

Who is 'you guys'?

Here is one of the gems in this thread from Willow
Now the bum knuckle turds think it's white privileges to walk down a sidewalk. Too funny.

Nobody has actually talked about what Senator Scott said- or the value of what he said. Not you. Not Willow.

You want to talk about 'cheap shots' because the title says 'the only black gop senator'? By USMB standards that is hardly a 'cheap shot'- it is entirely accurate- and it is relevant.

The very first response was Willow- who has done nothing but race bait this entire thread.

So why doesn't anyone want to talk about the content of what Senator Scott said?

Do you believe that he has experienced targetting because of his race?

Do you believe that his experience is relevant in the current discussion of race in the United States?

U guyz? Why the race baiting corporation known as the Dem Party. Weren't they suppose to have SOLVED this shit like about 40 years AGO? U guyz still waiting for them to get off their fat asses and FIX IT? U guyz are pretty damn gullible.

I bought it all. Sincerity, Insight and emotionally. Didn't use it as a weapon did he?

I believe it's the general ineptness and incompetence of Govt services that cause an undue burden on poor and minority communities. When they SCREW UP warrants and arrests. When they HARASS folks with life-ruining fines and sentences. A $250 car towing or a FALSE warrant can literally end the economic survival of a LOT of folks and send into an unresponsive and uncaring system of "justice".

The libertarian in me says that govt ought to be PUNISHED when they chronically **** up people's lives due to ineptness and DontgiveaCrap attitudes. But YOUR blessed DNC and BLM actors take to streets and declare.

WHAT DO WE WANT?

----- - MORE GOVT.

WHEN DO WE WANT IT?

---- NOW !!!

More layers of official oversight ROT. THat's what you been given. The watchers to watch the watchers.
And you're still buying that shtick after 40 years?

How stupid is it to jump to the conclusion that the only problem is "the pigs" and bias?

I am confused. What post are you replying to?

Because your post has nothing to do with my post.

Here is what my post that you hit 'reply' to said:

Who is 'you guys'?

Here is one of the gems in this thread from Willow
Now the bum knuckle turds think it's white privileges to walk down a sidewalk. Too funny.

Nobody has actually talked about what Senator Scott said- or the value of what he said. Not you. Not Willow.

You want to talk about 'cheap shots' because the title says 'the only black gop senator'? By USMB standards that is hardly a 'cheap shot'- it is entirely accurate- and it is relevant.

The very first response was Willow- who has done nothing but race bait this entire thread.

So why doesn't anyone want to talk about the content of what Senator Scott said?

Do you believe that he has experienced targetting because of his race?

Do you believe that his experience is relevant in the current discussion of race in the United States?

And my post still stands. You still are not talking about the content of what Senator Scott said.

You have gone off on some bizarre tangent about the Democratic Party and 'race baiting'.

You want to talk about whether we need more government or less government- well go ahead and start a topic on that.

You want to rant about how much you hate the DNC and Black Lives Matter- well go ahead and start a thread on that- that will just be another of the dozens of those started by the RWNJ' here every day.

You dearie do not want to talk about race relations unless we talk about it your way. .

LOL- I am not your dear.

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Because dear, you guys always refuse to address the blacks who do not say this is their experience and you call them names. Why are you so afraid to admit that?

So you are terrified of what Senator Scott says....because of how I post?

Wow.......

 

[Syriusly]

I commented. You quoted it and asked for a comment

Didn't see a comment on my post #69.. Tho I must have made a bunch of single minded race baiters very uncomfortable with what i said. Because I love them funnies. Means they were speechless.

Well certainly Willow Tree and the other right wing race baiters seem to be avoiding your post as much as you avoid the content of Senator Scott's speech.

There is just one question after listening to Senator Scott. Does this justify targeting and murdering cops? Yes or no.

Senator Scott never makes any justification for targeting and murdering cops. If you had listened to Senator Scott you would know that.

Then, last night, after police and protesters peacefully interacted throughout the night, came a devastating ambush in Dallas. Twelve police officers shot, five dead. There is absolutely no rationale for targeting law enforcement, and these actions are truly reprehensible.


Even during the tragedy, we saw the heroism of our brave law enforcement officers as they helped people to safety. We mourn the loss of these officers last night, and we are all praying for Dallas today.


Reacting to violence with violence will only lead to more heartache. As Dr. Martin Luther King Junior said, “returning violence for violence multiplies violence, adding deeper darkness to a night already devoid of stars.”


We cannot, will not, let hate win. We have bridges to cross, but we cannot allow madmen to widen the divide.


America is a beautiful portrait of diversity, and part of that picture is understanding how our neighbors see the world. I’ve often described our nation as a patchwork quilt. These patches are black and white; red and brown; woven together by this notion of freedom and love.


We have to look within ourselves to find the resources necessary to treat others as we would have them treat us.


My prayers are with every one of these mourning families today. Let's honor their memories by finding the solutions that need to be found.


God Bless our great nation.

 

[Syriusly]

Thanks for pointing out that President Obama is calling for unity.

It is way too late for that divisive asshole to call for unity.

For people like you, it was too late for President Obama to call for unity in December of 2007.

The only thing divisive about President Obama is that he is black- and you are not.

 

[WillowTree]

U guyz? Why the race baiting corporation known as the Dem Party. Weren't they suppose to have SOLVED this shit like about 40 years AGO? U guyz still waiting for them to get off their fat asses and FIX IT? U guyz are pretty damn gullible.

I bought it all. Sincerity, Insight and emotionally. Didn't use it as a weapon did he?

I believe it's the general ineptness and incompetence of Govt services that cause an undue burden on poor and minority communities. When they SCREW UP warrants and arrests. When they HARASS folks with life-ruining fines and sentences. A $250 car towing or a FALSE warrant can literally end the economic survival of a LOT of folks and send into an unresponsive and uncaring system of "justice".

The libertarian in me says that govt ought to be PUNISHED when they chronically **** up people's lives due to ineptness and DontgiveaCrap attitudes. But YOUR blessed DNC and BLM actors take to streets and declare.

WHAT DO WE WANT?

----- - MORE GOVT.

WHEN DO WE WANT IT?

---- NOW !!!

More layers of official oversight ROT. THat's what you been given. The watchers to watch the watchers.
And you're still buying that shtick after 40 years?

How stupid is it to jump to the conclusion that the only problem is "the pigs" and bias?

I am confused. What post are you replying to?

Because your post has nothing to do with my post.

Here is what my post that you hit 'reply' to said:

Who is 'you guys'?

Here is one of the gems in this thread from Willow
Now the bum knuckle turds think it's white privileges to walk down a sidewalk. Too funny.

Nobody has actually talked about what Senator Scott said- or the value of what he said. Not you. Not Willow.

You want to talk about 'cheap shots' because the title says 'the only black gop senator'? By USMB standards that is hardly a 'cheap shot'- it is entirely accurate- and it is relevant.

The very first response was Willow- who has done nothing but race bait this entire thread.

So why doesn't anyone want to talk about the content of what Senator Scott said?

Do you believe that he has experienced targetting because of his race?

Do you believe that his experience is relevant in the current discussion of race in the United States?

And my post still stands. You still are not talking about the content of what Senator Scott said.

You have gone off on some bizarre tangent about the Democratic Party and 'race baiting'.

You want to talk about whether we need more government or less government- well go ahead and start a topic on that.

You want to rant about how much you hate the DNC and Black Lives Matter- well go ahead and start a thread on that- that will just be another of the dozens of those started by the RWNJ' here every day.

You dearie do not want to talk about race relations unless we talk about it your way. .

LOL- I am not your dear.

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Because dear, you guys always refuse to address the blacks who do not say this is their experience and you call them names. Why are you so afraid to admit that?

So you are terrified of what Senator Scott says....because of how I post?

Wow.......

Okay dumbass. I am not terrified of you or anybody else. G f y.

 

[Syriusly]

I commented. You quoted it and asked for a comment

Didn't see a comment on my post #69.. Tho I must have made a bunch of single minded race baiters very uncomfortable with what i said. Because I love them funnies. Means they were speechless.

Well certainly Willow Tree and the other right wing race baiters seem to be avoiding your post as much as you avoid the content of Senator Scott's speech.

There is just one question after listening to Senator Scott. Does this justify targeting and murdering cops? Yes or no.

Of course not.

And another question just as valid: After listening to Senator Scott, does this justify putting ketchup on hotdogs? Yes or No.

No, the next question is, why are blacks targeting and killing police officers? Who taught them that this was okay? How have they bettered their situation?

The next question is why are white targeting and killing police officers. Who taught them that this was okay? How have they bettered their situation.

Do you support whites who kill cops?

 

[Syriusly]

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Senator Scott feels picked on, and he guesses its because he is black.

Maybe its because he ignores some traffic laws habitually?

The point is no one knows why he got stopped so much, and it is purely bullshit to jump to the conclusion it is solely because he is black..

The point is that he is expressing the sentiment that a large percentage of the black community believes- and he happens to be a Republican and a Senator.

Black Lives Matter was not created by some outside entity, it was not created by 'leftist agitators'- it was created by African Americans who- like Senator Scott- believe that they have been targetted- consciously- or unconsciously- by police.

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong.

There is room to believe both that:

1. The vast majority of police in America attempt to do their difficult jobs fairly and are there to help Americans and
2. That African Americans have been unfairly targeted by some police- consciously or unconsciously.

Anyone who just assumes that either of those cannot be true just is too partisan to be honest with themselves. Clearly that is what Senator Scott believes and I have no reason to believe he is not credible.

 

[Syriusly]

I am confused. What post are you replying to?

Because your post has nothing to do with my post.

Here is what my post that you hit 'reply' to said:

Who is 'you guys'?

Here is one of the gems in this thread from Willow
Now the bum knuckle turds think it's white privileges to walk down a sidewalk. Too funny.

Nobody has actually talked about what Senator Scott said- or the value of what he said. Not you. Not Willow.

You want to talk about 'cheap shots' because the title says 'the only black gop senator'? By USMB standards that is hardly a 'cheap shot'- it is entirely accurate- and it is relevant.

The very first response was Willow- who has done nothing but race bait this entire thread.

So why doesn't anyone want to talk about the content of what Senator Scott said?

Do you believe that he has experienced targetting because of his race?

Do you believe that his experience is relevant in the current discussion of race in the United States?

And my post still stands. You still are not talking about the content of what Senator Scott said.

You have gone off on some bizarre tangent about the Democratic Party and 'race baiting'.

You want to talk about whether we need more government or less government- well go ahead and start a topic on that.

You want to rant about how much you hate the DNC and Black Lives Matter- well go ahead and start a thread on that- that will just be another of the dozens of those started by the RWNJ' here every day.

You dearie do not want to talk about race relations unless we talk about it your way. .

LOL- I am not your dear.

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Because dear, you guys always refuse to address the blacks who do not say this is their experience and you call them names. Why are you so afraid to admit that?

So you are terrified of what Senator Scott says....because of how I post?

Wow.......

Okay dumbass. I am not terrified of you or anybody else. G f y.

Then why are you so terrified of what Senator Scott said?

 

[Syriusly]

Did someone teach whites it was ok to shoot cops?

No, but Black Lies Matter is applauding and encouraging people to kill more.

Apparently thats white people. 70%

Whats your ******* point, Nimrod?

Black Lies Matter does not patricularly care who is killing the cops nor their race. They just want pigs in a blanket fried like bacon.

However Black Lives Matter is calling for justice for blacks- and the end of violence against police.

In the last few days, this country witnessed the recorded murders of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile at the hands of police, the latest victims in this country’s failed policing system. As we have done for decades, we marched and protested to highlight the urgent need to transform policing in America, to call for justice, transparency and accountability, and to demand that Black Lives Matter.

In Dallas, many gathered to do the same, joining in a day of action with friends, family, and co-workers. Their efforts were cut short when a lone gunman targeted and attacked 11 police officers, killing five. This is a tragedy–both for those who have been impacted by yesterday’s attack and for our democracy. There are some who would use these events to stifle a movement for change and quicken the demise of a vibrant discourse on the human rights of Black Americans. We should reject all of this.


Black activists have raised the call for an end to violence, not an escalation of it. Yesterday’s attack was the result of the actions of a lone gunman. To assign the actions of one person to an entire movement is dangerous and irresponsible. We continue our efforts to bring about a better world for all of us.

 

[TooTall]

Thanks for pointing out that President Obama is calling for unity.

It is way too late for that divisive asshole to call for unity.

For people like you, it was too late for President Obama to call for unity in December of 2007.

The only thing divisive about President Obama is that he is black- and you are not.

This is when he started blaming cops and he hasn't stopped since.

"One of the first examples that's frequently cited came in the first year of Obama's first term. In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black, was arrested while trying to force his way into his own home in Cambridge, Mass. (The door was jammed.) As the incident gained national attention, Obama weighed in, saying that the arresting officer had "acted stupidly" for handcuffing and booking Gates."

The cop was white and stupid and the professor was black and not stupid according the the racist prick Obama.

 

[WillowTree]

Thanks for pointing out that President Obama is calling for unity.

It is way too late for that divisive asshole to call for unity.

For people like you, it was too late for President Obama to call for unity in December of 2007.

The only thing divisive about President Obama is that he is black- and you are not.

This is when he started blaming cops and he hasn't stopped since.

"One of the first examples that's frequently cited came in the first year of Obama's first term. In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black, was arrested while trying to force his way into his own home in Cambridge, Mass. (The door was jammed.) As the incident gained national attention, Obama weighed in, saying that the arresting officer had "acted stupidly" for handcuffing and booking Gates."

The cop was white and stupid and the professor was black and not stupid according the the racist prick Obama.

And he said he did not know the fact. Typical libtards behavior.

 

[flacaltenn]

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Senator Scott feels picked on, and he guesses its because he is black.

Maybe its because he ignores some traffic laws habitually?

The point is no one knows why he got stopped so much, and it is purely bullshit to jump to the conclusion it is solely because he is black..

The point is that he is expressing the sentiment that a large percentage of the black community believes- and he happens to be a Republican and a Senator.

Black Lives Matter was not created by some outside entity, it was not created by 'leftist agitators'- it was created by African Americans who- like Senator Scott- believe that they have been targetted- consciously- or unconsciously- by police.

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong.

There is room to believe both that:

1. The vast majority of police in America attempt to do their difficult jobs fairly and are there to help Americans and
2. That African Americans have been unfairly targeted by some police- consciously or unconsciously.

Anyone who just assumes that either of those cannot be true just is too partisan to be honest with themselves. Clearly that is what Senator Scott believes and I have no reason to believe he is not credible.

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Senator Scott feels picked on, and he guesses its because he is black.

Maybe its because he ignores some traffic laws habitually?

The point is no one knows why he got stopped so much, and it is purely bullshit to jump to the conclusion it is solely because he is black..

The point is that he is expressing the sentiment that a large percentage of the black community believes- and he happens to be a Republican and a Senator.

Black Lives Matter was not created by some outside entity, it was not created by 'leftist agitators'- it was created by African Americans who- like Senator Scott- believe that they have been targetted- consciously- or unconsciously- by police.

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong.

There is room to believe both that:

1. The vast majority of police in America attempt to do their difficult jobs fairly and are there to help Americans and
2. That African Americans have been unfairly targeted by some police- consciously or unconsciously.

Anyone who just assumes that either of those cannot be true just is too partisan to be honest with themselves. Clearly that is what Senator Scott believes and I have no reason to believe he is not credible.

If you don't know what their experience is -- you're wasting time arguing about this speech with no solutions.

Suggest you read ABOUT the causes and solutions and proposals in this thread.

Johnson - A libertarian view of "oppressive justice" on the streets.

Not gonna discuss it in this thread. But the outrage and oppression is indeed real.. So stop haranguing everybody for being insensitive and racist and start investigating the fundamental reasons.

 

[Syriusly]

Thanks for pointing out that President Obama is calling for unity.

It is way too late for that divisive asshole to call for unity.

For people like you, it was too late for President Obama to call for unity in December of 2007.

The only thing divisive about President Obama is that he is black- and you are not.

This is when he started blaming cops and he hasn't stopped since.

"One of the first examples that's frequently cited came in the first year of Obama's first term. In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black, was arrested while trying to force his way into his own home in Cambridge, Mass. (The door was jammed.) As the incident gained national attention, Obama weighed in, saying that the arresting officer had "acted stupidly" for handcuffing and booking Gates."

The cop was white and stupid and the professor was black and not stupid according the the racist prick Obama.

Hmmmm who commented about the cop being white?

Oh that would be the racist prick- you.

 

[Syriusly]

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Senator Scott feels picked on, and he guesses its because he is black.

Maybe its because he ignores some traffic laws habitually?

The point is no one knows why he got stopped so much, and it is purely bullshit to jump to the conclusion it is solely because he is black..

The point is that he is expressing the sentiment that a large percentage of the black community believes- and he happens to be a Republican and a Senator.

Black Lives Matter was not created by some outside entity, it was not created by 'leftist agitators'- it was created by African Americans who- like Senator Scott- believe that they have been targetted- consciously- or unconsciously- by police.

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong.

There is room to believe both that:

1. The vast majority of police in America attempt to do their difficult jobs fairly and are there to help Americans and
2. That African Americans have been unfairly targeted by some police- consciously or unconsciously.

Anyone who just assumes that either of those cannot be true just is too partisan to be honest with themselves. Clearly that is what Senator Scott believes and I have no reason to believe he is not credible.

This thread is about the speech of Senator Scott.

You refuse to talk about what Senator Scott said.

Why are you so terrified of addressing what Senator Scott said?

Senator Scott feels picked on, and he guesses its because he is black.

Maybe its because he ignores some traffic laws habitually?

The point is no one knows why he got stopped so much, and it is purely bullshit to jump to the conclusion it is solely because he is black..

The point is that he is expressing the sentiment that a large percentage of the black community believes- and he happens to be a Republican and a Senator.

Black Lives Matter was not created by some outside entity, it was not created by 'leftist agitators'- it was created by African Americans who- like Senator Scott- believe that they have been targetted- consciously- or unconsciously- by police.

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong.

There is room to believe both that:

1. The vast majority of police in America attempt to do their difficult jobs fairly and are there to help Americans and
2. That African Americans have been unfairly targeted by some police- consciously or unconsciously.

Anyone who just assumes that either of those cannot be true just is too partisan to be honest with themselves. Clearly that is what Senator Scott believes and I have no reason to believe he is not credible.

If you don't know what their experience is -- you're wasting time arguing about this speech with no solutions.

Suggest you read ABOUT the causes and solutions and proposals in this thread.

Johnson - A libertarian view of "oppressive justice" on the streets.

Not gonna discuss it in this thread. But the outrage and oppression is indeed real.. So stop haranguing everybody for being insensitive and racist and start investigating the fundamental reasons.

I can no more 'know' the experience of African Americans than I can 'know' what American Jews experience- or frankly 'know' what Donald Trump experiences.

But I can listen to what people say rather than ignore what they say.

And please feel free to show me the quote of me 'haranguing' everybody for being insensitive.

Unlike the posts of Willow- which have tunnel visioned focused on attacking African Americans- I am staying on point- which is focused on the comments of Senator Scott.

 

[JimBowie1958]

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong. .....

I can no more 'know' the experience of African Americans than I can 'know' what American Jews experience- or frankly 'know' what Donald Trump experiences.

But I can listen to what people say rather than ignore what they say.

And please feel free to show me the quote of me 'haranguing' everybody for being insensitive.

Unlike the posts of Willow- which have tunnel visioned focused on attacking African Americans- I am staying on point- which is focused on the comments of Senator Scott.

A fine example of modern Democrat racial divisive rhetoric and horse shit.

Any man can understand the experiences of any other man, not 100%, but then no one can understand the experiences of any other man 100%. We all have different sets of experiences, learning and faith values. Race doesnt have jack shit to do with any of it.

Where does it benefit the black community if police are so ham strung in enforcing the law that they reluctantly protect the black community as a result? More blacks get victimized that way by their chief predator, criminals, and how does that possibly benefit the black community, you racist jack ass?

It is this libtard division by race that erodes the idea that we can be truly empathetic with each other because we are all at root human beings.

Again, you fall back on your Nazi knee jerk reflex.

 

[JimBowie1958]

70% of cops are shot by whites. Why arent whites taking their advice for blacks and stop this?

Our advice, to engage in your racial nonsense, is to obey the cop as instructed and show respect.

How do you figure we are not doing that overall?

What percentage of whites are killing cops? I am sure it isnt even 1%, doofus.

Then why ya'll shooting so many cops?

There is no 'ya'll' dumb ****.

The people doing this are CRIMINALS, and their race is only incidental, though I know it is a mighty difficult thing for your racist brain to wrap around.

 

[Syriusly]

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong. .....

I can no more 'know' the experience of African Americans than I can 'know' what American Jews experience- or frankly 'know' what Donald Trump experiences.

But I can listen to what people say rather than ignore what they say.

And please feel free to show me the quote of me 'haranguing' everybody for being insensitive.

Unlike the posts of Willow- which have tunnel visioned focused on attacking African Americans- I am staying on point- which is focused on the comments of Senator Scott.

A fine example of modern Democrat racial divisive rhetoric and horse shit.

Any man can understand the experiences of any other man, not 100%, but then no one can understand the experiences of any other man 100%. .

As you point out- no man can understand the experiences of any other man 100%.

Exactly as I was stating.

As a white man- I don't really know what their experience is- but there is no reason for me to assume that they are all wrong. .....

I can no more 'know' the experience of African Americans than I can 'know' what American Jews experience- or frankly 'know' what Donald Trump experiences.

But I can listen to what people say rather than ignore what they say.

So lets go to your comment:

Where does it benefit the black community if police are so ham strung in enforcing the law that they reluctantly protect the black community as a result? More blacks get victimized that way by their chief predator, criminals, and how does that possibly benefit the black community, you racist jack ass?

'racist jack ass'?

Because I dare to listen to what a black senator says?

See once you call me a 'racist jack ass' yeah I pretty much realize that I am just dealing with another right wing nut job bigot.

Again.

 

[TooTall]

Thanks for pointing out that President Obama is calling for unity.

It is way too late for that divisive asshole to call for unity.

For people like you, it was too late for President Obama to call for unity in December of 2007.

The only thing divisive about President Obama is that he is black- and you are not.

This is when he started blaming cops and he hasn't stopped since.

"One of the first examples that's frequently cited came in the first year of Obama's first term. In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black, was arrested while trying to force his way into his own home in Cambridge, Mass. (The door was jammed.) As the incident gained national attention, Obama weighed in, saying that the arresting officer had "acted stupidly" for handcuffing and booking Gates."

The cop was white and stupid and the professor was black and not stupid according the the racist prick Obama.

Hmmmm who commented about the cop being white?

Oh that would be the racist prick- you.

"In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black,............"

The arresting cop was white, but his partner, a black cop, agreed 100% that the arrest was completely justified and so publicly stated.

The only racist in the picture was Obama, who rushed to judgement without knowing the facts based on the race of the cop.

 

[Syriusly]

70% of cops are shot by whites. Why arent whites taking their advice for blacks and stop this?

Our advice, to engage in your racial nonsense, is to obey the cop as instructed and show respect.

How do you figure we are not doing that overall?

What percentage of whites are killing cops? I am sure it isnt even 1%, doofus.

Then why ya'll shooting so many cops?

There is no 'ya'll' dumb ****.

The people doing this are CRIMINALS, and their race is only incidental, though I know it is a mighty difficult thing for your racist brain to wrap around.

Odd isn't it- how selective your posts are?

You didn't reply to Willow's posts- where he kept asking why 'blacks are shooting cops'

Apparently 'racism' is only 'racism' to you when someone accuses whites of doing something.

 

[Dot Com]

Does it justify targeting and murdering cops? Yes or no?

Of course not dumbass, but for the intellectually disarmed such as yourself, there can be nothing in between.

Stfu moron. I asked in a civil manner so there was no need for you to attack me.

We've all watched you on here for a while love, so drop the oh-I'm-civil-but -you're-not bullshit.

^ that

EVERYONE HERE KNOWS that WillerTwee is a a one trick pony

 

[Syriusly]

It is way too late for that divisive asshole to call for unity.

For people like you, it was too late for President Obama to call for unity in December of 2007.

The only thing divisive about President Obama is that he is black- and you are not.

This is when he started blaming cops and he hasn't stopped since.

"One of the first examples that's frequently cited came in the first year of Obama's first term. In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black, was arrested while trying to force his way into his own home in Cambridge, Mass. (The door was jammed.) As the incident gained national attention, Obama weighed in, saying that the arresting officer had "acted stupidly" for handcuffing and booking Gates."

The cop was white and stupid and the professor was black and not stupid according the the racist prick Obama.

Hmmmm who commented about the cop being white?

Oh that would be the racist prick- you.

"In July 2009, historian Henry Louis Gates, who is black,............"

Tootall: The cop was white a.....the the racist prick Obama.

Yep- once again you are pointing out that the racist is you- not President Obama.