The one political poll that matters

[Seawytch]

Here in the United States, racism is most prevalent in the South, in the slave states. Deflection doesn't change that fact.

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

And you never lived there I did for like 15 years, the old Democrats are dying out

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

**** you my entire journey in life was to live in as many states as I could..


Illinois

Tennessee
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Wyoming
Idaho

Not to mention when I traveled on business for 10 years

The south is not racist today

Yes, it is. Sure, it's not as racist as it was 40 or 50 years ago, but it's still racist.

 

[Redfish]

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

And you never lived there I did for like 15 years, the old Democrats are dying out

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

**** you my entire journey in life was to live in as many states as I could..


Illinois

Tennessee
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Wyoming
Idaho

Not to mention when I traveled on business for 10 years

The south is not racist today

Yes, it is. Sure, it's not as racist as it was 40 or 50 years ago, but it's still racist.

more red in the northeast than in the south. what is the source data for that chart?

 

[Seawytch]

?'ll?

Here in the United States, racism is most prevalent in the South, in the slave states. Deflection doesn't change that fact.

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

And you never lived there I did for like 15 years, the old Democrats are dying out

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

horseshit! there is more racism against indians and mexicans in Colorado than there is against blacks in all of the southern states combined.

How many times do you have to be told that you saying something does not make it true. You'll notice that, unlike you, I support my claims with facts. You don't because you have nothing more than what you pulled out of your ass.

 

[Seawytch]

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

And you never lived there I did for like 15 years, the old Democrats are dying out

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

**** you my entire journey in life was to live in as many states as I could..


Illinois

Tennessee
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Wyoming
Idaho

Not to mention when I traveled on business for 10 years

The south is not racist today

Yes, it is. Sure, it's not as racist as it was 40 or 50 years ago, but it's still racist.

more red in the northeast than in the south. what is the source data for that chart?

Yes, in rural areas....You know, like those that get extra consideration in the Electoral College. More vestiges of America's racist history that should be gotten rid of. The map came from the same study I cited earlier.

Racist people in the U.S. appear to be clustered along the Appalachian Mountains from Georgia, through New York and all the way up to Vermont, at least according to a Washington Post report Tuesday that cited a recent study published in the scientific journal PLOS One.​

Where do racists in America live?

 

[Seawytch]

Are you capable of independent though at all? Slave states:

Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia.

Civil Rights Act:

Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that had made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.[23]

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)

It's all purely regional. The southern states have always been racist regardless of party.

the entire world has always been racist and still is today. To pretend otherwise in naive at best, stupid at worst. If you think its not racist, go to the Congo as a white person and see how you are treated. Racism is a mammalian trait, we are trying to reduce it, but it will always be there. Wolves run with wolves, and rabbits run with rabbits, and collies run with collies. Its not bad or evil, its just nature.

This is not condoning or approving of it, merely stating a biological fact.

Here in the United States, racism is most prevalent in the South, in the slave states. Deflection doesn't change that fact.

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

I have lived most of my life in southern states, I don't know any racists and I know a lot of people of all races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and ages.

I do see racism in the big blue northern cities where the democrats in control have limited the opportunities of minorities in order to keep them on the plantation, dependent, and voting democrat.

It is also a fact that the majority of blacks in the south did not want their kids bused across town in order to comply with federal integration regulations. Racial pride is a normal human condition, discrimination is the problem that we need to deal with and discrimination affects people of every race, color, religion, and ethnicity, as well as sex, size, and age.

If you think that race is the only entity that is subject to discrimination or that discrimination only happens to blacks you are either very naive or very stupid.

Institutionalized racism exists everywhere. Racists live everywhere. Most of them live...in the south.

​

 

[Redfish]

?'ll?

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

And you never lived there I did for like 15 years, the old Democrats are dying out

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

horseshit! there is more racism against indians and mexicans in Colorado than there is against blacks in all of the southern states combined.

How many times do you have to be told that you saying something does not make it true. You'll notice that, unlike you, I support my claims with facts. You don't because you have nothing more than what you pulled out of your ass.

A "study" done by a group with a political agenda is not a fact. My posts on the topic of race are based on a lifetime of experiences in every part of this country and several others.

I fully understand why liberals like you want to keep race as an issue, because you know that you cannot win on ideology or results. Liberalism is a loser, and even those of you who subscribe to it know that.

What is a fact is that the dem/libs of today are the most racist people on the planet. They use race to keep minoritities subservient and dependent and that is the worst form of racism.

 

[Redfish]

the entire world has always been racist and still is today. To pretend otherwise in naive at best, stupid at worst. If you think its not racist, go to the Congo as a white person and see how you are treated. Racism is a mammalian trait, we are trying to reduce it, but it will always be there. Wolves run with wolves, and rabbits run with rabbits, and collies run with collies. Its not bad or evil, its just nature.

This is not condoning or approving of it, merely stating a biological fact.

Here in the United States, racism is most prevalent in the South, in the slave states. Deflection doesn't change that fact.

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

I have lived most of my life in southern states, I don't know any racists and I know a lot of people of all races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and ages.

I do see racism in the big blue northern cities where the democrats in control have limited the opportunities of minorities in order to keep them on the plantation, dependent, and voting democrat.

It is also a fact that the majority of blacks in the south did not want their kids bused across town in order to comply with federal integration regulations. Racial pride is a normal human condition, discrimination is the problem that we need to deal with and discrimination affects people of every race, color, religion, and ethnicity, as well as sex, size, and age.

If you think that race is the only entity that is subject to discrimination or that discrimination only happens to blacks you are either very naive or very stupid.

Institutionalized racism exists everywhere. Racists live everywhere. Most of them live...in the south.

​

That is simply not true. If you want to see real racism, go to Saudi Arabia or Africa. You are trying to equate the democrats of the 1800s to the southerners of today. Its not working, witchey.

 

[Redfish]

And you never lived there I did for like 15 years, the old Democrats are dying out

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

**** you my entire journey in life was to live in as many states as I could..


Illinois

Tennessee
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Wyoming
Idaho

Not to mention when I traveled on business for 10 years

The south is not racist today

Yes, it is. Sure, it's not as racist as it was 40 or 50 years ago, but it's still racist.

more red in the northeast than in the south. what is the source data for that chart?

Yes, in rural areas....You know, like those that get extra consideration in the Electoral College. More vestiges of America's racist history that should be gotten rid of. The map came from the same study I cited earlier.

Racist people in the U.S. appear to be clustered along the Appalachian Mountains from Georgia, through New York and all the way up to Vermont, at least according to a Washington Post report Tuesday that cited a recent study published in the scientific journal PLOS One.​

Where do racists in America live?

LOL, and you cite the most biased paper in the country as a valid data source????? Stop making a fool of yourself.

 

[Seawytch]

You have zero clue where I lived. I've lived all over the United States and I found the most out and out racists in Florida and Virginia.

**** you my entire journey in life was to live in as many states as I could..


Illinois

Tennessee
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Wyoming
Idaho

Not to mention when I traveled on business for 10 years

The south is not racist today

Yes, it is. Sure, it's not as racist as it was 40 or 50 years ago, but it's still racist.

more red in the northeast than in the south. what is the source data for that chart?

Yes, in rural areas....You know, like those that get extra consideration in the Electoral College. More vestiges of America's racist history that should be gotten rid of. The map came from the same study I cited earlier.

Racist people in the U.S. appear to be clustered along the Appalachian Mountains from Georgia, through New York and all the way up to Vermont, at least according to a Washington Post report Tuesday that cited a recent study published in the scientific journal PLOS One.​

Where do racists in America live?

LOL, and you cite the most biased paper in the country as a valid data source????? Stop making a fool of yourself.

I have sources whereas you have nothing but crap pulled from your ass. Ass facts aren't real facts...but I can see how a Trump sycophant wouldn't know truth from ass facts.

 

[Seawytch]

Here in the United States, racism is most prevalent in the South, in the slave states. Deflection doesn't change that fact.

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

I have lived most of my life in southern states, I don't know any racists and I know a lot of people of all races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and ages.

I do see racism in the big blue northern cities where the democrats in control have limited the opportunities of minorities in order to keep them on the plantation, dependent, and voting democrat.

It is also a fact that the majority of blacks in the south did not want their kids bused across town in order to comply with federal integration regulations. Racial pride is a normal human condition, discrimination is the problem that we need to deal with and discrimination affects people of every race, color, religion, and ethnicity, as well as sex, size, and age.

If you think that race is the only entity that is subject to discrimination or that discrimination only happens to blacks you are either very naive or very stupid.

Institutionalized racism exists everywhere. Racists live everywhere. Most of them live...in the south.

​

That is simply not true. If you want to see real racism, go to Saudi Arabia or Africa. You are trying to equate the democrats of the 1800s to the southerners of today. Its not working, witchey.

I don't need to go anywhere. Plenty of home grown racism to counter right here in the US of A. This wasn't that long ago...

 

[Redfish]

**** you my entire journey in life was to live in as many states as I could..


Illinois

Tennessee
South Carolina
Wisconsin
Georgia
Arizona
Colorado
Wyoming
Idaho

Not to mention when I traveled on business for 10 years

The south is not racist today

Yes, it is. Sure, it's not as racist as it was 40 or 50 years ago, but it's still racist.

more red in the northeast than in the south. what is the source data for that chart?

Yes, in rural areas....You know, like those that get extra consideration in the Electoral College. More vestiges of America's racist history that should be gotten rid of. The map came from the same study I cited earlier.

Racist people in the U.S. appear to be clustered along the Appalachian Mountains from Georgia, through New York and all the way up to Vermont, at least according to a Washington Post report Tuesday that cited a recent study published in the scientific journal PLOS One.​

Where do racists in America live?

LOL, and you cite the most biased paper in the country as a valid data source????? Stop making a fool of yourself.

I have sources whereas you have nothing but crap pulled from your ass. Ass facts aren't real facts...but I can see how a Trump sycophant wouldn't know truth from ass facts.

funny, coming from someone who quotes the Wash Post as a valid unbiased source. speaking of ass facts.

 

[Redfish]

the racism I witnessed in the west against indians and mexicans was worse than anything in today's south.

we live in today, witchey, not the 1800s.

the racists of today reside in the democrat party just as they did in the past. you can try to make it geographical if you want, but its not.

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

I have lived most of my life in southern states, I don't know any racists and I know a lot of people of all races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and ages.

I do see racism in the big blue northern cities where the democrats in control have limited the opportunities of minorities in order to keep them on the plantation, dependent, and voting democrat.

It is also a fact that the majority of blacks in the south did not want their kids bused across town in order to comply with federal integration regulations. Racial pride is a normal human condition, discrimination is the problem that we need to deal with and discrimination affects people of every race, color, religion, and ethnicity, as well as sex, size, and age.

If you think that race is the only entity that is subject to discrimination or that discrimination only happens to blacks you are either very naive or very stupid.

Institutionalized racism exists everywhere. Racists live everywhere. Most of them live...in the south.

​

That is simply not true. If you want to see real racism, go to Saudi Arabia or Africa. You are trying to equate the democrats of the 1800s to the southerners of today. Its not working, witchey.

I don't need to go anywhere. Plenty of home grown racism to counter right here in the US of A. This wasn't that long ago...

Yes, there are still racists in the world. but they do not all reside in the southern USA as you claimed.

There are black racists, white racists, muslim racists, asian racists, christian racists, media racists, gay racists, straight racists, hollywood racists, KKK racists, BLM racists. YES, racism still exists, but you ignorantly claim that it exists only in one place and one political party. YOU are FOS.

 

[Seawytch]

Not even close, fishy. Do you think segregation happened in the 1800s? Are you stupid as well as ridiculous? The southern racists still live there...They just vote Republican now.

I have lived most of my life in southern states, I don't know any racists and I know a lot of people of all races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and ages.

I do see racism in the big blue northern cities where the democrats in control have limited the opportunities of minorities in order to keep them on the plantation, dependent, and voting democrat.

It is also a fact that the majority of blacks in the south did not want their kids bused across town in order to comply with federal integration regulations. Racial pride is a normal human condition, discrimination is the problem that we need to deal with and discrimination affects people of every race, color, religion, and ethnicity, as well as sex, size, and age.

If you think that race is the only entity that is subject to discrimination or that discrimination only happens to blacks you are either very naive or very stupid.

Institutionalized racism exists everywhere. Racists live everywhere. Most of them live...in the south.

​

That is simply not true. If you want to see real racism, go to Saudi Arabia or Africa. You are trying to equate the democrats of the 1800s to the southerners of today. Its not working, witchey.

I don't need to go anywhere. Plenty of home grown racism to counter right here in the US of A. This wasn't that long ago...

Yes, there are still racists in the world. but they do not all reside in the southern USA as you claimed.

There are black racists, white racists, muslim racists, asian racists, christian racists, media racists, gay racists, straight racists, hollywood racists, KKK racists, BLM racists. YES, racism still exists, but you ignorantly claim that it exists only in one place and one political party. YOU are FOS.

I didn't claim any such thing. Stop lying like your lord and master does. I said that most racists in the United States live in the south. This is a fact you cannot dispute.

 

[The Original Tree]

Can’t we do Forced Deportation of Democrats To Canada after The President’s re-election?

 

[Flopper]

Polling services do exactly that. They tell manufactures the kind of product the consumer wants, marketing the kind of advertising most likely to produce results, and policy makers what the public wants from government. However, polls are not the only forecasting tools used by businesses and government.

Ah sarcasm eludes you. If polls were able to predict so well there would only need to be one car built, one beer offered for sale, no need for people to vote. The problem is science wants to believe it understands how humans think and act, therefore it can predict everything about them.
The problem is it is very far from even coming close.

Polls don't tell us whether a car, a beer, or politician candidate is good or bad. They only tell us what people think.

Polls are only accurate when people have strong opinions or preferences. For example if a poll was done to determine the best table sale, it would be worthless because there is little difference in taste and most people don't have any opinion. Politician polls are much more accurate because most people have strong opinions and preferences in regard to candidates and issues. Studies have shown that political polls are among the most accurate, about 80%. Polls on the death penalty vary greatly because people vacillate. I have never seen a poll on beer, however you can bet that people who market and advertise the products have.

In politics, government, and business polling is extremely important because it tells us what people think about issues, political candidates, consumer products, and public policy. Governments, politician candidates, and business spend billions of dollars on research studies and polls to determine public opinion. If it was worthless, they would not be spending that kind of money on it.

So they are used for things but not accurate. They are extremely important but they are only accurate in certain circumstances. Companies and political candidates pay big money for polls that are not accurate or are only accurate in certain circumstances or certain instances.
Got it.
So if polls are only accurate in certain instances and certain circumstances how accurate are they if you have say an extra 10% of the people polled that lean Democrat? What happens to the extreme accuracy of a poll that has a slightly larger number of undecided? What happens to this supposed accuracy if someone feels a need to keep from being chastised by a pollster?

Many people think that in a poll of 500 people, the pollster contacts only 500 people and that's the poll, not so. Typically, in scientific, the pollsters will contact far more people than in the final sample because many of those contacted will not be counted in order for the poll to be represent of the population. If the criteria used to construct the sample is party favored, age, family income, race, sex then those selected will form a statically average that matches the area being polled.

If a poll reveals a much larger number of undecided voters than expected, then the confidence level of poll will be low. How polls handle undecided voters varies by polls. Some polls eliminated them because they believe that they will split in the same manner as decided voters. However most polls report them as undecided.

Keep in mind, pollster don't call elections. They just report how the population being polled plans to vote or who they favor. It is forecasters in news organization that use polling data and other research to call elections.

Oh geez, another nice try, but inaccurate. when the pollsters select a sample of 500 or 1000 they attempt to include a proportional mix of every demographic in the population being sampled. In a diverse country of 330,000,000 its simply impossible to proportionally include every demographic in a sample of 1000.

and you refuse to accept the fact that the pollsters are paid by someone with an agenda. like it or not, today's polls are propaganda, not polling.

That's correct. A poll can not be an exact match of the population. That's why they have a polling error, most often 3% but that error can be as much as 5% in some polls and as low as 2% in others. A poll with a 3% error means plus or minus 3 percent. So if a poll indicates a candidate will win 51% to 49%, and the real vote is 49% and 51%, the poll is accurate; that is, the results are within it's polling error.

Election polls by major polling services are paid for by subscribers who receive the polls in advance of their press release and get an analysis of the poll including confident level. Polls that accurate indicate the winner of elections get more subscriptions and those that don't get less subscriptions. Accuracy in indicating winners in major elections is a big selling factor in marketing their services to the commercial, government, and political market.

Most major candidates use polling service to conduct private polls within specific areas to determine where they stand with voters, usually on specific issues. They may or may not release these polls.

All of the above applies to scientific polls who use proven polling techniques. Organization who favor a candidate may create their own polls to sway opinions.

 

[basquebromance]

Politicians and political buffs love few things more than poring over recent election results. They study them the way fortune-tellers examine tea leaves. And for the same reason — they’re looking for signs indicating how the next presidential election will go.

 

[basquebromance]

"
Kentucky. The Bluegrass State picks its governor in the off-year immediately preceding a presidential election. And in the four previous cycles before 2019, the party that won the governor’s mansion there went on to win the White House twelve months later. Consider the evidence.

In 2003, Republican Ernie Fletcher was elected governor. The following year, President George W. Bush was reelected.

In 2007, Democrat Steve Beshear won. In 2008, Democrat Barack Obama also won the presidency.

In 2011, Beshear was reelected. In 2012, Obama was, too.

In 2015, Republican Matt Bevin emerged victorious. In 2016, Republican President Trump did as well."

congratulations President Hillary!

/THREAD

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"
Kentucky. The Bluegrass State picks its governor in the off-year immediately preceding a presidential election. And in the four previous cycles before 2019, the party that won the governor’s mansion there went on to win the White House twelve months later. Consider the evidence.

In 2003, Republican Ernie Fletcher was elected governor. The following year, President George W. Bush was reelected.

In 2007, Democrat Steve Beshear won. In 2008, Democrat Barack Obama also won the presidency.

In 2011, Beshear was reelected. In 2012, Obama was, too.

In 2015, Republican Matt Bevin emerged victorious. In 2016, Republican President Trump did as well."

congratulations President Hillary!

/THREAD

hell clinton didn't match the rally poll numbers the President had

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I have lived most of my life in southern states, I don't know any racists and I know a lot of people of all races, ethnicities, backgrounds, and ages.

I do see racism in the big blue northern cities where the democrats in control have limited the opportunities of minorities in order to keep them on the plantation, dependent, and voting democrat.

It is also a fact that the majority of blacks in the south did not want their kids bused across town in order to comply with federal integration regulations. Racial pride is a normal human condition, discrimination is the problem that we need to deal with and discrimination affects people of every race, color, religion, and ethnicity, as well as sex, size, and age.

If you think that race is the only entity that is subject to discrimination or that discrimination only happens to blacks you are either very naive or very stupid.

Institutionalized racism exists everywhere. Racists live everywhere. Most of them live...in the south.

​

That is simply not true. If you want to see real racism, go to Saudi Arabia or Africa. You are trying to equate the democrats of the 1800s to the southerners of today. Its not working, witchey.

I don't need to go anywhere. Plenty of home grown racism to counter right here in the US of A. This wasn't that long ago...

Yes, there are still racists in the world. but they do not all reside in the southern USA as you claimed.

There are black racists, white racists, muslim racists, asian racists, christian racists, media racists, gay racists, straight racists, hollywood racists, KKK racists, BLM racists. YES, racism still exists, but you ignorantly claim that it exists only in one place and one political party. YOU are FOS.

I didn't claim any such thing. Stop lying like your lord and master does. I said that most racists in the United States live in the south. This is a fact you cannot dispute.

the most racist don't live in the south but there are plenty of racist everywhere race matters not.
obama's pastor was/is a racist.

 

[Flopper]

"
Kentucky. The Bluegrass State picks its governor in the off-year immediately preceding a presidential election. And in the four previous cycles before 2019, the party that won the governor’s mansion there went on to win the White House twelve months later. Consider the evidence.

In 2003, Republican Ernie Fletcher was elected governor. The following year, President George W. Bush was reelected.

In 2007, Democrat Steve Beshear won. In 2008, Democrat Barack Obama also won the presidency.

In 2011, Beshear was reelected. In 2012, Obama was, too.

In 2015, Republican Matt Bevin emerged victorious. In 2016, Republican President Trump did as well."

congratulations President Hillary!

/THREAD

And in Oct. 2019, Andy Beshear, democrat beat the republican, Matt Bevin. So what does that tell you about the 2020 presidential race