During the McMartin Preschool trials (look them up, they're very interesting) I told everybody that was interested that something stunk to high Heaven.
I was right.
During the OJ Trial, I told anybody that would listen that the prosecution didn't have a case and that Marcia Clark and that Darden guy were douchebags.
I said then, and I'll tell you now... I don't know if OJ was guilty or innocent but I would have voted NOT Guilty about ten seconds after hitting the Jury Room.
During the Duke LaCrosse Trial, I told everybody that would listen that Mike Nifong was a scumbag, that Crystal Mangum was a douche and that the boys were probably guilty of being..... Boys. Nothing else.
In all those cases, I was right and I'm right on this case.
If I thought for one second.... One ******* second, that George Zimmerman was guilty of anything other than being in the wrong place at the wrong time and of being something of a *****....
I would pull the lever on Old Sparky myself.
This is a lynching, Marc.
Just that goddam simple. A lynching.
Proud of yourself?
As accurate as you may have been in the pas, I sure hope you're wrong for the first time on this one.
I don't see how an unarmed kid can be where he was supposed to be, unarmed, not committing any crime, gets targeted and ultimately killed and the killer gets to walk away Scot free as if nothing happened.
Does that sound like justice to you?
Marc, if that is what you believe actually happened, then I understand your outrage. However, in my opinion, based on the evidence available, I don't believe that is exactly went down.
But, I will respect your opinion, and I'm sure others would too, if you would just be willing to see over the fence to the other side and admit that the evidence leaves doubt to your account.