Fairly unlikely, I have a pretty hard head. I can take a punch pretty well.
But that isn't the point here.
The point here is, if Zimmerman shot Trayvon because he was angry, that's manslaughter.
And that kind of sounds like where the jury is leaning.
First of all, I know you lack a proper knowledge in human anatomy. You have two areas on the side of your skull, called the temple. The term is derived for the muscle and the bone underneath, the temporal bone and the temporalis muscle. One of two things can occur, if something sharp hits that area, it can penetrate the skin, muscle and bone to cause fatal brain damage. If something blunt hits you, like a human fist, you can cause bone to fracture into and lodge itself in the brain. You can literally drive that area of the skull into the person's brain just by punching. I know, because I have studied comparative anatomy since 2008.
That's nice. Are you putting that to some kind of use, because it seems if you have all day to sit home and watch this trial, it's not like you have a productive job. Just saying.
Point was, ZImmerman had no broken bones, concusssions, etc. He did not require hospitialization. EMT"s on the scene described his injuries as MINOR.
He was not in fear for his life.
[
That's where your wrong firstly.
Secondly, Zimmerman never exhibited anger during the fight. And instead of anger, it was frustration over a rash of burglaries which drove him to say "******* punks" or "these assholes always get away." He shot him out of fear. You generalize too much.
Again, if Zimmerman were afraid, he would have never gotten out of the truck.