The odds are in favor of Hunter Biden in imminent lawsuit against computer repairman

[Lastamender]

You are the one stating he is innocent, how would I know?

How you would know anything is another good question.

 

[Coyote]

Because the FBI had it for almost a year and did nothing with it? What would you do if you had evidence that could mean a candidate for President could very well be compromised by our biggest political rival? Nothing? He gave it to Rudy because he knew it would be made public!

The real question that you should be asking Coyote is what higher ups at the FBI were doing during all of this?

He waited a whole year until right before an election? How do you know the FBI did nothing with it? Nothing that has thus far been authenticated and publically released indicates any criminal activity by Joe Biden and it seems they are getting to charge Hunter Biden with tax fraud.

 

[Oldestyle]

He waited a whole year until right before an election? How do you know the FBI did nothing with it? Nothing that has thus far been authenticated and publically released indicates any criminal activity by Joe Biden and it seems they are getting to charge Hunter Biden with tax fraud.

You tell me what they did with it, Coyote! They had it for a year. Obviously that was more than enough time to establish it's authenticity.

As for the decision to give it to Rudy before the election? One can only assume he was waiting for the FBI to do something with it. When they didn't? What choice did he have?

 

[Hellokitty]

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Guest view: Hunter Biden’s laptop and data: A legal and data privacy analysis - Delaware Business Now

By David L. Hecht, Esq. A newly released document suggests that on April 12, 2019 Hunter Biden signed an $85 services “quote” from the Mac Shop in Wilmington covering labor […]

delawarebusinessnow.com

But liberals have been saying the laptop wasn't Hunters, and the stuff on the laptop, not belong to Hunter, was Russian disinformation.
But go ahead and defend Hunters right to be a pedophile, illegal drug use and treason, we expect nothing less from members of the liberal cult.

 

[Oldestyle]

You don't think that an email saying 10% goes to the "Big Guy" and two of Hunter's business partners identifying Joe Biden as the "Big Guy" indicates criminal activity? Simple question...did Joe Biden declare that income on his taxes?

 

[Coyote]

An estimated 35% of voters who went to the polls during that election said in exit polls that they knew nothing about the Biden family making millions from Communist China and Ukraine, Coyote.

There is no evidence that Joe Biden got any money from China or Ukraine. Why would it be relevant?

They didn't know about it because the FBI, Main Steam Media, Social Media and the Biden campaign conspired to keep it from them! THAT is tampering with an election...not some made up "dossiers"!

The FBI has traditionally not said anything about ongoing investigations, and especially before an election. Comey broke with that when he announced he was reopening an investigation shortly before Election Day. That could very well have thrown the election to Trump, we will never know. The investigation turned up nothing in the end.

When DoJ FBI investigation is opened and ongoing, we don’t know if any crimes were committed or if any charges will be leveled. Everyone is presumed innocent. When this is in an election year, and the investigation concerns candidates, blabbing before the facts are known and the investigation is concluded could influence an election. Why should they do that?

 

[Coyote]

But liberals have been saying the laptop wasn't Hunters, and the stuff on the laptop, not belong to Hunter, was Russian disinformation.
But go ahead and defend Hunters right to be a pedophile, illegal drug use and treason, we expect nothing less from members of the liberal cult.

How about sticking to what is actually known and not making up crap and claiming people want to defend it?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Another message board lawyer pretending content in Hunter Biden's laptop was "illegal" (note they never tell us what specifically was illegal).
Is this where you pretend he had pictures of naked minors?

Pretend? They're interwoven in with the crack pipes and ukraine bribes.

 

[Nostra]

There is no evidence that Joe Biden got any money from China or Ukraine. Why would it be relevant?





The FBI has traditionally not said anything about ongoing investigations, and especially before an election. Comey broke with that when he announced he was reopening an investigation shortly before Election Day. That could very well have thrown the election to Trump, we will never know. The investigation turned up nothing in the end.

When DoJ FBI investigation is opened and ongoing, we don’t know if any crimes were committed or if any charges will be leveled. Everyone is presumed innocent. When this is in an election year, and the investigation concerns candidates, blabbing before the facts are known and the investigation is concluded could influence an election. Why should they do that?

If the FBI doesn’t say anything about ongoing investigations, how do you know there is no evidence Chicom Joe got money from China, Simp?

 

[Nostra]

How about sticking to what is actually known and not making up crap and claiming people want to defend it?

Irony.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The only thing known that would be illegal would be smoking crack, but that Is no secret. The rest is more embarrassing than illegal.

If that was all that was on there, I could care less about someone smoking crack.

 

[Oldestyle]

There is no evidence that Joe Biden got any money from China or Ukraine. Why would it be relevant?





The FBI has traditionally not said anything about ongoing investigations, and especially before an election. Comey broke with that when he announced he was reopening an investigation shortly before Election Day. That could very well have thrown the election to Trump, we will never know. The investigation turned up nothing in the end.

When DoJ FBI investigation is opened and ongoing, we don’t know if any crimes were committed or if any charges will be leveled. Everyone is presumed innocent. When this is in an election year, and the investigation concerns candidates, blabbing before the facts are known and the investigation is concluded could influence an election. Why should they do that?

How can you claim there is no evidence Joe got money from China? Hunter's emails complain about the money that he had to give to his father. The damning email that quotes 10% being held for the Big Guy. Two of Hunter's business partners testified that the Big Guy was indeed Joe Biden. There is actually A LOT of evidence that the Biden family made millions from influence peddling and that Joe got his share!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Guest view: Hunter Biden’s laptop and data: A legal and data privacy analysis - Delaware Business Now

By David L. Hecht, Esq. A newly released document suggests that on April 12, 2019 Hunter Biden signed an $85 services “quote” from the Mac Shop in Wilmington covering labor […]

delawarebusinessnow.com

So, this really is Hunters laptop and not Russian disinformation???

 

[Coyote]

You tell me what they did with it, Coyote! They had it for a year. Obviously that was more than enough time to establish it's authenticity.

I don’t know enough about it say how difficult it is. What I have read has indicate that there are serious issues with chain of custody and while some of the material is as initially on tbe laptop not all is. You are also operating on the assumption that there is material indicating major crimes implicating Joe Biden on it and expect the FBI to have done something, but there may well not be and that is wishful thinking, not the FBI doing nothing.

As for the decision to give it to Rudy before the election? One can only assume he was waiting for the FBI to do something with it. When they didn't? What choice did he have?

Lots of choice.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Guest view: Hunter Biden’s laptop and data: A legal and data privacy analysis - Delaware Business Now

By David L. Hecht, Esq. A newly released document suggests that on April 12, 2019 Hunter Biden signed an $85 services “quote” from the Mac Shop in Wilmington covering labor […]

delawarebusinessnow.com

Yes! The leftists record of success is quite impressive.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Right-wingers argue that the computer repairman acquired the laptop as abandoned property, but according to this legal analyst, only the hardware and not the data belongs to the repairman in this case. The repairman cannot use Hunter Biden's copyrighted images, emails, etc. The only permissible action the repairman could have taken with the data is to recover it:

Guest view: Hunter Biden’s laptop and data: A legal and data privacy analysis - Delaware Business Now

By David L. Hecht, Esq. A newly released document suggests that on April 12, 2019 Hunter Biden signed an $85 services “quote” from the Mac Shop in Wilmington covering labor […]

delawarebusinessnow.com

I find it hilarious that they denied that the laptop was real and a disinformation operation. Now it's real and the fact that Biden failed to retrieve it after one year is not abandonment and the property with its contents then became the shop owner's property. Read the contractual agreement.

They have tried every avenue to keep Hunters Criminal acts and joe Biden's criminal acts concealed and unusable in court. That is all this is about. This is a desperation operation to shield the Big Guy from criminal prosecution.

 

[Oldestyle]

I don’t know enough about it say how difficult it is. What I have read has indicate that there are serious issues with chain of custody and while some of the material is as initially on tbe laptop not all is. You are also operating on the assumption that there is material indicating major crimes implicating Joe Biden on it and expect the FBI to have done something, but there may well not be and that is wishful thinking, not the FBI doing nothing.



Lots of choice.

What choice? He's watching Joe Biden LIE through his teeth in the debates about the lap top! He's watching the 51 former intelligence officials LIE through their teeth about the lap top and the FBI isn't saying a word. The election looms. What would you do?

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

This is what desperate attorneys do. Oh yeah, the biden camp is scared. They know what's in there, the child porn, ukraine bribes, etc.

Ten Years Of Oil *Joe better hope there’s nothing on the Clintons and Obama’s on it or it’s bye bye Hunter.

 

[Dragonlady]

Copyrighted?

Anyone who creates content of any kind - letters, photos, memos, etc., owns a personal copyright to the content created, and no one can use private and/or copyrighted materials without the prior written consent of the owners. This applies to songs, photos, and your own image, if used in broadcast or publication.

Every time you see a Dunkin' Donuts coffee cup on the TV or movie screen, Dunkin' Donuts signed a release for you to see it. And if you don't have a signed release, Dunkin' Donuts can sue your ass for copyright infringement. Everyone who's picture appears in a newspaper or magazine, has signed a release for that photo to be printed/broadcast.

There is an entire branch of the insurance industry devoted insuring television and movies productions from lawsuits for copyright infringement.

E&O: What Filmmakers Need to Know

If you understand what Errors & Omissions (E&O) is and how it can serve your production needs, you’ll set your next film up for even greater success.

www.frontrowinsurance.com

The is also true of magazine and newspaper publishing.

 

[progressive hunter]

Anyone who creates content of any kind - letters, photos, memos, etc., owns a personal copyright to the content created, and no one can use private and/or copyrighted materials without the prior written consent of the owners. This applies to songs, photos, and your own image, if used in broadcast or publication.

Every time you see a Dunkin' Donuts coffee cup on the TV or movie screen, Dunkin' Donuts signed a release for you to see it. And if you don't have a signed release, Dunkin' Donuts can sue your ass for copyright infringement. Everyone who's picture appears in a newspaper or magazine, has signed a release for that photo to be printed/broadcast.

There is an entire branch of the insurance industry devoted insuring television and movies productions from lawsuits for copyright infringement.

E&O: What Filmmakers Need to Know

If you understand what Errors & Omissions (E&O) is and how it can serve your production needs, you’ll set your next film up for even greater success.

www.frontrowinsurance.com

The is also true of magazine and newspaper publishing.

at least youre not calling it russian disinfo any more,,