The odds are in favor of Hunter Biden in imminent lawsuit against computer repairman

[progressive hunter]

He's pulling a Trump?

along with tens of thousands of other americans,,

 

[postman]

no it doesnt,, it doesnt show how it got there,,

now all hunter has to do is prove the emails in question were put on there after he no longer had it by providing his email steam to be investigated,,

Any email sent from your laptop, looks like it was sent from you. But could have been sent by whoever had possession

If possession is in doubt, "reasonable doubt", guess what the outcome has to be.

 

[progressive hunter]

Any email sent from your laptop, looks like it was sent from you. But could have been sent by whoever had possession

If possession is in doubt, "reasonable doubt", guess what the outcome has to be.

the emails in question happened long before possession was an issue,,

 

[postman]

the emails in question happened long before possession was an issue,,

Hunter is a crackhead. He didn't know where his laptop was half the time.

 

[progressive hunter]

Hunter is a crackhead. He didn't know where his laptop was half the time.

or where he was at or who he was fucking,, and as we see the claims against him are that he raped underage girls and sold out our country for profit that he shared with his father the POTUS,,

I am concerned since you have yet to deny raping little boys in your basement,, is there a reason you wont deny that??

 

[OKTexas]

...nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself...

This thread is talking about the crackhead filing a civil suit, your trolling wouldn't apply in a deposition in a civil case. You can also bet the defense will have many examples of his signature to compare to the one he signed at the repair shop.

.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Doesn’t this fall into the same category of “if they find any criminal tax activities when searching for documents at mar a lago, they are within their rights to use that against trump”? Kind of the same thing isn’t it?

 

[postman]

or where he was at or who he was fucking,, and as we see the claims against him are that he raped underage girls and sold out our country for profit that he shared with his father the POTUS,,

Claims that would require Hunter to confess in order to be proven, because the remaining evidence against him is a broken chain.

 

[postman]

This thread is talking about the crackhead filing a civil suit, your trolling wouldn't apply in a deposition in a civil case. You can also bet the defense will have many examples of his signature to compare to the one he signed at the repair shop.

.

This is where his reputation protects him. He was a crackhead. "I don't remember" is not only how he can answer any question, but is likely the honest truth since there are days or weeks, that Hunter has no recollection of.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste, but it also means you can't get blood from a stone.

 

[progressive hunter]

Claims that would require Hunter to confess in order to be proven, because the remaining evidence against him is a broken chain.

a confession is just one way,, presenting the evidence of both the laptop and other things like public records witness testimony and many many other things,,

chain of custody will only be a small part,,

 

[postman]

Doesn’t this fall into the same category of “if they find any criminal tax activities when searching for documents at mar a lago, they are within their rights to use that against trump”? Kind of the same thing isn’t it?

Not unless they were presidential records.

If they weren't named in the search warrant, they are inadmissible, and tree of the poison fruit.

 

[postman]

This thread is talking about the crackhead filing a civil suit, your trolling wouldn't apply in a deposition in a civil case. You can also bet the defense will have many examples of his signature to compare to the one he signed at the repair shop.

.

That signature is no more than a scribble.

No handwriting expert could exclude it being by someone elses hand.

 

[OKTexas]

This is where his reputation protects him. He was a crackhead. "I don't remember" is not only how he can answer any question, but is likely the honest truth since there are days or weeks, that Hunter has no recollection of.

A mind is a terrible thing to waste, but it also means you can't get blood from a stone.

A signature is done via muscle memory troll. Now run along and bother someone else.

.

 

[postman]

chain of custody will only be a small part,,

Chain of custody is needed to get the contents of the laptop into evidence. Excluding them, also excludes "fruit of the poison tree".

If they found the receiver of the emails through information on the laptop, it too would be excluded evidence.

 

[postman]

A signature is done via muscle memory troll.

Like driving under the influence?

 

[progressive hunter]

Chain of custody is needed to get the contents of the laptop into evidence. Excluding them, also excludes "fruit of the poison tree".

If they found the receiver of the emails through information on the laptop, it too would be excluded evidence.

no its not,,,

 

[postman]

no its not,,,

A motion to suppress is a motion that revolves around the exclusion of evidence from trial. In the United States, a motion to suppress is a request made by a criminal defendant in advance of a criminal trial asking the court to exclude certain evidence from the trial.

Forms of evidence judges consider inadmissible include hearsay, prejudicial, improperly obtained

 

[progressive hunter]

A motion to suppress is a motion that revolves around the exclusion of evidence from trial. In the United States, a motion to suppress is a request made by a criminal defendant in advance of a criminal trial asking the court to exclude certain evidence from the trial.

making a motion doesnt mean it will be supressed,,,

 

[postman]

making a motion doesnt mean it will be supressed,,,

Forms of evidence judges consider inadmissible include hearsay, prejudicial, improperly obtained

 

[progressive hunter]

Forms of evidence judges consider inadmissible include hearsay, prejudicial, improperly obtained

when was in proven to be improperly obtained??

and when did consider mean it will be suppressed??