postman
Diamond Member
- Feb 23, 2017
- 18,795
- 9,641
- 1,250
I wasnt alive then you dumbass,,, nor was I asked,,
Also, you never denied killing Ron Goldman.
If you think lack of denial is proof, we can keep this up all day.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I wasnt alive then you dumbass,,, nor was I asked,,
since you asked I deny it,, and before you do I have never had sex with underage children,,So you admit you never denied killing JFK.
Got it.
again no one ever asked,, so yes I do deny killing who ever that is,,Also, you never denied killing Ron Goldman.
If you think lack of denial is proof, we can keep this up all day.
The court of public opinion has no say in this case... until then the court of public opinion based on all the lies from joe and deflections from hunter and the rest of the left hunter is a pedophile drug addict that works for a foreign country under his fathers direction to buy american tech firms that specialize in military tech,,
Too late. We already have you on record, admitting you never denied it.since you asked I deny it,,
of course we do,, just like you are currently commenting on it,,The court of public opinion has no say in this case.
If anything you've just setup a change of venue to somewhere they never heard of Hunters laptop. Which is just about nowhere.
hunter was asked and refused to answer,,
and you have never denied raping little boys in your basement,,Too late. We already have you on record, admitting you never denied it.
Anything you say now can be presumed a lie to cover your tracks.
See how that works.
What I say has absolutely no bearing on a potential criminal case.of course we do,, just like you are currently commenting on it,,
do you want to keep playing this stupid game??
when did I say what I said does???What I say has absolutely no bearing on a potential criminal case.
I'm just showing why the DOJ don't want anything to do with Hunters laptop. If they can't prove a case because there's no chain of custody, what's the sense in wasting time, money and manpower to develop a case they can't win?
Actually the chain is broken between Hunter and the repair shop.
The shop owner can't ID Hunter
And Hunter doesn't admit dropping it off.
and your stupid prize is people now think you raped little boys in your basement since you wont deny it,,,Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
They don't have a chain of custody.the DOJ doesnt want anything to do with it is because they have become political favoring the democrat party,,
...nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself...He will when he's put under oath. Or he will lie.
.
ok,, and then they continue to prove whats on the laptop was put there by someone else,,They don't have a chain of custody.
All the judge has to do is ask: "Do you have a witness to who dropped off the laptop?"
No your honor. All we have is a theory of how it got to the store owner.
That possibility breaks the chain of custody.ok,, and then they continue to prove whats on the laptop was put there by someone else,,
what is it you leftist say everytime someone wont testify??...nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself...
what is it you leftist say everytime someone wont testify??
no it doesnt,, it doesnt show how it got there,,Which breaks the chain of custody.