Check out what is in BOLD-----and these Democratic FKS can't believe we have a shadow Government involved in this bs. PIZZAGATE anyone.....
Even more disturbing than this undeniably creepy interview process is Kinsey’s “evidence” presented in Part II, particularly the subhead entitled “Pre-adolescent Orgasm.” The infamous Tables 31 through 34 document the numbers of babies and young boys who had “experienced” orgasm, the number of orgasms they experienced, and the length of the orgasm. The youngest of these children was two months old, but Kinsey includes 28 children in the “Up to 1 yr.” category.
[22] Kinsey claimed that the information in these categories came from interviews with children, parents and teachers who had observed children, and adults who remembered their own experiences.
[23] In responding to allegations that Kinsey actually paid pedophiles to abuse children and record their experiences[24], The Kinsey Institute responded, “ . . . Kinsey stated that there were nine men who [sic] he had interviewed who had sexual experiences with children who had told him about how the children had responded and reacted. We believe that one of those men was the source of the data listed in the book.”
[25] John Bancroft, former director of The Kinsey Institute, examines the problem more fully in a reprint of
Sexuality and the Human Female (Kinsey’s sequel to
Sexuality and the Human Male). He believes that Kinsey was particularly impressed with the records of one man, who recorded in extensive detail all of his sexual encounters (with men, women, and children). Bancroft also observes that Kinsey was “intrigued by the various ways in which orgasm was experienced,” and outlined six different ways that both adults and children express orgasm.
[26] Two of these involve sobbing or other signs of distress, and Bancroft notes, “As these descriptions were applied to pre-adolescent boys as well as adults, they have been taken by some to indicate that these children were being tortured. . . . In retrospect Kinsey’s judgment in not anticipating such misinterpretations, and in placing so much emphasis on this one man’s evidence, can be questioned.” Indeed.