The NY times now sympathizing with pedophiles: says our laws fail them

[Uncensored2008]

[

I'm willing to build nuthouses to store them in. It is, after all, a mental illness. Just like homosexuality.

I honestly have no issue with homosexuals. Or gamblers, prostitutes, alcoholics, etc. Pedophiles are in another category, they prey on the innocent.

 

[jasonnfree]

This is the natural progression of the Left. There ARE NO LIMITS. They will always push America deeper into the sewer.

Natural progression of the left? Dennis hastert, former speaker of the house, was a right winger, now serving time for child molestation.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Which is where we are at the moment. There doesnt seem to be a perfect solution.

typical leftist respond...

We protect children from pedos, by protecting pedos from any censure!

Yeah, that'll work!

I havent proposed any solution. But the article makes a strong case which may protect kids.
Its only your partisan idiocy that doesnt "get" this.

Its like ypu want kids to be abused so you can "rebuke" their abusers.

Really, that's funny, I missed that case altogether.

Can you please reference the specifics?

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Get back in the kitchen you stupid fuck. You would see infants abused rather than look for a solution. You disgust me.

 

[Uncensored2008]

[
Natural progression of the left? Dennis hastert, former speaker of the house, was a right winger, now serving time for child molestation.

The right wants Hassert in prison. The left sees Hassert as making a life style choice...

 

[Tommy Tainant]

typical leftist respond...

We protect children from pedos, by protecting pedos from any censure!

Yeah, that'll work!

I havent proposed any solution. But the article makes a strong case which may protect kids.
Its only your partisan idiocy that doesnt "get" this.

Its like ypu want kids to be abused so you can "rebuke" their abusers.

Really, that's funny, I missed that case altogether.

Can you please reference the specifics?

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I havent proposed any solution. But the article makes a strong case which may protect kids.
Its only your partisan idiocy that doesnt "get" this.

Its like ypu want kids to be abused so you can "rebuke" their abusers.

Really, that's funny, I missed that case altogether.

Can you please reference the specifics?

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

You've posted that about a dozen times in this thread...I don't give a shit, execute them. They cannot be cured, the are owed nothing.

Now fug off, appeaser

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Really, that's funny, I missed that case altogether.

Can you please reference the specifics?

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

You've posted that about a dozen times in this thread...I don't give a shit, execute them. They cannot be cured, the are owed nothing.

Now fug off, appeaser

You stupid ****.

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Who do you propose to execute you stupid slag ?

 

[koshergrl]

I havent proposed any solution. But the article makes a strong case which may protect kids.
Its only your partisan idiocy that doesnt "get" this.

Its like ypu want kids to be abused so you can "rebuke" their abusers.

Really, that's funny, I missed that case altogether.

Can you please reference the specifics?

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

Er..yes, they self identify as pedos. That's the point, you faggoty lunatic. They are making the distinction between the good pedos, who fantasize about brutal sex with underage children...

and the bad pedos, who act on those fantasies.

 

[koshergrl]

[
Natural progression of the left? Dennis hastert, former speaker of the house, was a right winger, now serving time for child molestation.

The right wants Hassert in prison. The left sees Hassert as making a life style choice...

Who needs to be protected and hidden from prying eyes who might not understand how wonderful he is.

That's how you protect children, after all!

 

[koshergrl]

"Part of this failure stems from the misconception that pedophilia is the same as child molestation. One can live with pedophilia and not act on it. Sites like Virtuous Pedophiles provide support for pedophiles who do not molest children and believe that sex with children is wrong. It is not that these individuals are “inactive” or “nonpracticing” pedophiles, but rather that pedophilia is a status and not an act. In fact, research shows, about half of all child molesters are not sexually attracted to their victims."

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html?_r=0

So you have read it but are too stupid to understand it.

Tell me what your strategy is for protecting kids from sexual abuse ?

I read it and understand it just fine, thanks. I read it two years ago when it came out, as well. I also read and understood when the APA published their diagnostic handbook, and listed pedophilia as a sexual orientation, instead of a mental illness.

Unlike you, I look at the words used and instead of trying to *interpret* them so that they mean something other than what they actually say, I hold people accountable for what they say..i.e., that we are being unfair to pedophiles when we fail to recognize that their alternative sexuality is something they can't help and which is totally separate from abuse routinely served upon children by pedophiles.

My strategy to protect children? While that deserves a thread of it's own, I guess it is first of all to point out when fake media sites promote pedophilia as an alternative, yet perfectly harmless, lifestyle.

You?

Well, like yourself I dont have a strategy.

However ,like the article suggests, I can see a benefit in identifying these people before they offend.

Thats just common sense.

At the moment preventative strategies are not working and kids are being harmed every day. Very often by people who should be protecting them.

I have a great compromise between killing pedos outright, and allowing the state to place vulnerable children in their homes as state-paid "foster" children...

Let's build great big nuthouses, and just house them. They can create kiddie porn (without real children, of course) they want and jerk their peckers harmlessly morning, noon and night.

The kids are protected, the perverts are protected, everybody is happy.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Get back in the kitchen you stupid fuck. You would see infants abused rather than look for a solution. You disgust me.

You're a very vulgar "human being" hiding behind the anonymity of the web.

 

[Picaro]

Really, that's funny, I missed that case altogether.

Can you please reference the specifics?

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

Er..yes, they self identify as pedos. That's the point, you faggoty lunatic. They are making the distinction between the good pedos, who fantasize about brutal sex with underage children...

and the bad pedos, who act on those fantasies.

Yes, the Richard Dawkins types think there is such a distinction, as do many 'Gay Activists' like the founder of Act Up and others, and the two rapists who killed the Dirkhuesen boy. It is more than ridiculous to release pedoes who have been convicted, given the recidivism rate, over 90%. Allowing homosexual males to adopt young children is even more ridiculous.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Its not complicated but it may be a bit over your head.

Without legal protection, a pedophile cannot risk seeking treatment or disclosing his status to anyone for support. He could lose his job, and future job prospects, if he is seen at a group-therapy session, asks for a reasonable accommodation to take medication or see a psychiatrist, or requests a limit in his interaction with children. Isolating individuals from appropriate employment and treatment only increases their risk of committing a crime.

I can translate into shit-kicker for you if that helps ?

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

You've posted that about a dozen times in this thread...I don't give a shit, execute them. They cannot be cured, the are owed nothing.

Now fug off, appeaser

You stupid ****.

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Who do you propose to execute you stupid slag ?

Look who's calling anyone a slag? Some overweight fag who appeases pedos (not to mention Muzzies, who go hand in hand)? Give me a break

 

[koshergrl]

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

You've posted that about a dozen times in this thread...I don't give a shit, execute them. They cannot be cured, the are owed nothing.

Now fug off, appeaser

You stupid ****.

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Who do you propose to execute you stupid slag ?

Look who's calling anyone a slag? Some overweight fag who appeases pedos (not to mention Muzzies, who go hand in hand)? Give me a break

Tommy hates women. He loves men and children though.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

You've posted that about a dozen times in this thread...I don't give a shit, execute them. They cannot be cured, the are owed nothing.

Now fug off, appeaser

You stupid ****.

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Who do you propose to execute you stupid slag ?

Look who's calling anyone a slag? Some overweight fag who appeases pedos (not to mention Muzzies, who go hand in hand)? Give me a break

Tommy hates women. He loves men and children though.

He's a pig

 

[koshergrl]

He had to start another thread because he can't get any footage in this one...

and of course it was a stupid cross-post/call out thread. Now he's all butt hurt that it was moved to the rubber room hahahahaaa.

 

[Picaro]

The article suggests prohibiting discrimination against Pedophiles because pedophilia should be classified as a mental disability. I have no problem with pre-treatment before any assault takes place but I have a real problem with the article's suggestion.

The recidivism rate among pedos is close to 100%, even in castration cases, so the only way to keep them away from kids is lifetime incarceration.

That would definitely drive pedos who haven't offended underground.

They're all underground, until they get caught, which is why they should never be released after being caught.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Ah, so we need to protect pedophiles from children. Brilliant strategy! And that is EXACTLY what I thought you would say. Because that is the only thing that article advocates.

Hide the pedos so they can't be identified. That way children are safer from them .

OTAY!

Just execute them and be done with it.

Look I know that you are one dumb fuck but the whole point of the article is -

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Kids are being abused because you are too thick to understand the problem.

You've posted that about a dozen times in this thread...I don't give a shit, execute them. They cannot be cured, the are owed nothing.

Now fug off, appeaser

You stupid ****.

YOU DONT KNOW THEY ARE PAEDOS .

Who do you propose to execute you stupid slag ?

Look who's calling anyone a slag? Some overweight fag who appeases pedos (not to mention Muzzies, who go hand in hand)? Give me a break

You genuinely dont comprehend what the journo is saying do you ? Now I understand trump.

 

[polarbear]

sicking... wtf is wrong with these people.

They normalized homosexuality, now on the the next deviant lifestyle.

Exactly and it was quite obvious that after that perversion was normalized, pedophilia would be the next step. Being a pedophile is a choice not some sort of involuntary act..and so is homosexuality.
It`s not a disease either, mental or physical, it is a conscientious choice not different from the food you choose to eat when you are hungry and have to eat. There is another reason why we have so many fags lately and that would be the widespread use of hormones in our food supply.
Pathogenesis and epidemiology of precocious puberty. Effects of exogenous oestrogens
Here are a few lines:
Precocious puberty is generally defined as the appearance of secondary sex characteristics before age 8 years in girls (or menarche before age 9 years) and before 9 years in boys.
And here:
Exposure to exogenous estrogens in food: possible impact on human development and health
Exposure to exogenous estrogens in food: possible impact on human development and health
Treatment of cattle with naturally occurring or synthetic sex hormones may enhance lean muscle growth and improve feed efficiency and is therefore a very cost effective procedure for cattle producers who have used it for decades in some Western countries, including the USA and Canada.
These levels are needed for estimates of the normal daily production rates of estradiol in children, who may be particularly sensitive to low levels of estradiol. In our opinion, the conclusions by JECFA concerning the safety of hormone residues in meat seem to be based on uncertain assumptions and inadequate scientific data
Thus, even today the US FDA bases its guidelines on the presumably highly overestimated production rates in prepubertal children given in the JECFA 1988 report. 4) The possible biological significance of very low levels of estradiol is neglected. In conclusion, based on our current knowledge possible adverse effects on human health by consumption of meat from hormone-treated animals cannot be excluded.
It is safe to say that Children who have been affected by these hormones will not be the same adults later as they would be had they not been exposed so early in their lives to an elevated level of sex-hormones. So that would be a good way to start instead of coddling fags and pedophiles