The number of potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.

The number of potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.

Not out here in the really real world.
I must really stink in the really real world.

View attachment 422715
Depends on how close you're standing to a tRumpling. How did you take that selfie with your head stuck up there?
Maybe if you pulled your head out of Uranus you could see something for once...
Projection.

I mean seriously, dude. You just listed the selfie.

Derp.
 
This would be the NY Times headline and on every news channel if Trump was the one suspected of fraud.
The hypocrisy is beyond belief. A media double standard like this
is very dangerous.
The media has shown that it is indeed the enemy of the PEOPLE. The media needs to be destroyed.
This is a lie.
No, it is a stone cold fact. CNN isn't called the clinton news network for nothing, troll boy.
Nothing from you is ever a fact, stone cold or otherwise!
And CNN is known as the CON$ervative News Network, as you well know.
 
Potentially fraudulent ballot................ What the fuck is that? Isn't any ballot potentially fraudulent?

Was that really Billy Joe Ray Bob who cast that ballot? Maybe it was a clone made by the Democrats. Maybe Wilma voted Democrat because Joe Biden was holding a gun to her parakeet's head?

Maybe The great orange POS cheated but didn't cheat enough to win - you know, another Trump failure.

Or maybe enough people saw Trump for what he really is - a fat ass stupid fuck con man whose only talent is the ability to lie & dupe dumbass people.
 
A data analyst performed 35 experiments in 5 states regarding voter data in the presidential election. According to his findings, in at least three of the states the number of questionable or potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.


The state legislatures of Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Georgia and Nevada will figure it out.

POTENTIALLY fraudulent.

Which means they are not fraudulent but someone somewhere believes they COULD be.

Where is the evidence of massive, wide spread fraud?
 
In what respect are they "questionable"? Your hyperlink wouldn't allow me to read the article without entering my email address which I declined to do.

A data analyst performed 35 experiments in 5 states regarding voter data in the presidential election. According to his findings, in at least three of the states the number of questionable or potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.

The leader of the Voter Integrity Project and former Trump Data and Strategy Director, Matt Braynard, explained his findings in an interview with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp. Braynard said he found over 1,000 voters in Georgia who listed themselves at addresses that are post offices or other facilities the Postal Service leases or owns like FedEx or UPS stores. They also disguised their PO boxes as apartments.

Matt Braynard: “So rather than saying PO box 123, the address is listed as Apartment 123. And that’s a major red flag. And what’s also remarkable about these individuals, is that almost all of them voted early absentee, very few voted in person. So that really raises a red flag because they’re illegally registered. And it’s—and not just incidentally, but intentionally meant to deceive by listing suite number or unit number rather than technically what it is, which is a box number.”

For example, a voter listed his or her address as 724 Charlie Smith Senior Highway, Saint Marys, Georgia, Apartment 5402.

According to the Federal Voting Assistance Program, when requesting an absentee ballot, a PO box cannot be used as a mailing address.

Now on to Pennsylvania. Braynard had teams call people the state marked as having received a ballot request, but from whom the state never got the actual ballot. In other words people who supposedly requested a ballot, but it never arrived to be counted in their name.

Matt Braynard: “The first question we asked is, did you actually request that ballot? And in many cases, they said no, which is a big red flag because somebody had to request that ballot. And by law, it had to be them or somebody that they designated legally to do so.”

Here is an example of a call his team made to a Pennsylvania resident.

“We show that *BLEEP* in the state of Pennsylvania is marked as having received an absentee ballot request from you but did not receive your absentee ballot. Did you request an absentee ballot?”

Resident: “No.”


The second question they asked was if the voter returned the ballot. Many (who did receive a ballot) said yes, which Braynard says is a red flag because the state did not receive it and their vote was not counted.

Matt Braynard: “We’re hoping that by making this State discovery that will lead to judicial remedies that could bring greater scrutiny to the election such as signature evaluation or manual recounts, as well as law enforcement to look into exactly who requested those ballots. And then, if the people did mail them back in, or why they didn’t get counted, why they didn’t make it to the clerk’s office.”

Braynard says his analysis should have been done before the election by cleaning up voter rolls to remove ineligible voters—and during the election by objecting to ballots that should not be counted. He says once the ballots are taken out of the absentee envelopes, it’s hard to remedy the problem, short of a judge ordering a complete do-over of the election.
 
POTENTIALLY fraudulent.

Which means they are not fraudulent but someone somewhere believes they COULD be.

Where is the evidence of massive, wide spread fraud?
^^^Truth Nazi.
mail (1).gif
 
The Pa hearings clearly proved the MSM claim of "No evidence of fraud"
is total bullshit.

What could they be hiding ?

They didn't prove anything.

The same people spewing lies to you - and yes, they are lying to you - refused to make the same allegations in court.

Where, you know, it really matters.
You know, right before I came across your post I was wondering why Trump's attorneys are not alleging anything that would allow their lawsuits to actually be heard.

One of the last judges to rebuke them stated that "Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here". So they aren't just unable to prove their allegations, they haven't articulated them properly so that they survive being tossed out for "failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted" (paraphrasing FRCP 12(b)(6)).

He also mentioned that the relief they're seeking (the invalidation of the election) is grossly "disproportionate to the procedural challenges raised" which I'm guessing means that even if the allegations were true or could be proven, that the remedy would not involve throwing out the entire election results.

I'm not an attorney but I do know a little bit about our legal system and what I've seen from Trump's attorneys is extreme in my opinion. Anyone else who filed 30 lawsuits and all of them were thrown out as being baseless would be sanctioned by the judge(s) or the Bar Association, to my understanding.

The last dismissal:
https://www.vox.com/2020/11/28/2172...ts-lawsuit-rejected-3rd-circuit-court-appeals
 
In what respect are they "questionable"? Your hyperlink wouldn't allow me to read the article without entering my email address which I declined to do.

A data analyst performed 35 experiments in 5 states regarding voter data in the presidential election. According to his findings, in at least three of the states the number of questionable or potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.

The leader of the Voter Integrity Project and former Trump Data and Strategy Director, Matt Braynard, explained his findings in an interview with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp. Braynard said he found over 1,000 voters in Georgia who listed themselves at addresses that are post offices or other facilities the Postal Service leases or owns like FedEx or UPS stores. They also disguised their PO boxes as apartments.

Matt Braynard: “So rather than saying PO box 123, the address is listed as Apartment 123. And that’s a major red flag. And what’s also remarkable about these individuals, is that almost all of them voted early absentee, very few voted in person. So that really raises a red flag because they’re illegally registered. And it’s—and not just incidentally, but intentionally meant to deceive by listing suite number or unit number rather than technically what it is, which is a box number.”

For example, a voter listed his or her address as 724 Charlie Smith Senior Highway, Saint Marys, Georgia, Apartment 5402.

According to the Federal Voting Assistance Program, when requesting an absentee ballot, a PO box cannot be used as a mailing address.

Now on to Pennsylvania. Braynard had teams call people the state marked as having received a ballot request, but from whom the state never got the actual ballot. In other words people who supposedly requested a ballot, but it never arrived to be counted in their name.

Matt Braynard: “The first question we asked is, did you actually request that ballot? And in many cases, they said no, which is a big red flag because somebody had to request that ballot. And by law, it had to be them or somebody that they designated legally to do so.”

Here is an example of a call his team made to a Pennsylvania resident.

“We show that *BLEEP* in the state of Pennsylvania is marked as having received an absentee ballot request from you but did not receive your absentee ballot. Did you request an absentee ballot?”

Resident: “No.”


The second question they asked was if the voter returned the ballot. Many (who did receive a ballot) said yes, which Braynard says is a red flag because the state did not receive it and their vote was not counted.

Matt Braynard: “We’re hoping that by making this State discovery that will lead to judicial remedies that could bring greater scrutiny to the election such as signature evaluation or manual recounts, as well as law enforcement to look into exactly who requested those ballots. And then, if the people did mail them back in, or why they didn’t get counted, why they didn’t make it to the clerk’s office.”

Braynard says his analysis should have been done before the election by cleaning up voter rolls to remove ineligible voters—and during the election by objecting to ballots that should not be counted. He says once the ballots are taken out of the absentee envelopes, it’s hard to remedy the problem, short of a judge ordering a complete do-over of the election.
The issue regarding the physical address versus a P.O. box masquerading as a physical location might be prohibited in some states for voter registration but it's hardly sinister. Lots of people use companies that provide physical addresses with a box/unit number specifically so that it doesn't appear as a P.O. box. Some of the stores that provide this service also are able to act as an agent for service of process (they can access service of legal documents on behalf of the owner of the box) so there are many advantages to a person using services such as this that doesn't indicate anything nefarious.

So do they know how many people who requested a ballot for which there is no record that it was returned, and what percentage of voters that number represents if indeed their vote went uncounted? In other words, while this definitely needs to be looked into and way prior to our next election, for the current election is the number high enough to change the result of the election?
 
Actually----no.

Trump hasn't lost-----race is still going in case you haven't noticed....
 
In what respect are they "questionable"? Your hyperlink wouldn't allow me to read the article without entering my email address which I declined to do.

A data analyst performed 35 experiments in 5 states regarding voter data in the presidential election. According to his findings, in at least three of the states the number of questionable or potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.

The leader of the Voter Integrity Project and former Trump Data and Strategy Director, Matt Braynard, explained his findings in an interview with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp. Braynard said he found over 1,000 voters in Georgia who listed themselves at addresses that are post offices or other facilities the Postal Service leases or owns like FedEx or UPS stores. They also disguised their PO boxes as apartments.

Matt Braynard: “So rather than saying PO box 123, the address is listed as Apartment 123. And that’s a major red flag. And what’s also remarkable about these individuals, is that almost all of them voted early absentee, very few voted in person. So that really raises a red flag because they’re illegally registered. And it’s—and not just incidentally, but intentionally meant to deceive by listing suite number or unit number rather than technically what it is, which is a box number.”

For example, a voter listed his or her address as 724 Charlie Smith Senior Highway, Saint Marys, Georgia, Apartment 5402.

According to the Federal Voting Assistance Program, when requesting an absentee ballot, a PO box cannot be used as a mailing address.

Now on to Pennsylvania. Braynard had teams call people the state marked as having received a ballot request, but from whom the state never got the actual ballot. In other words people who supposedly requested a ballot, but it never arrived to be counted in their name.

Matt Braynard: “The first question we asked is, did you actually request that ballot? And in many cases, they said no, which is a big red flag because somebody had to request that ballot. And by law, it had to be them or somebody that they designated legally to do so.”

Here is an example of a call his team made to a Pennsylvania resident.

“We show that *BLEEP* in the state of Pennsylvania is marked as having received an absentee ballot request from you but did not receive your absentee ballot. Did you request an absentee ballot?”

Resident: “No.”


The second question they asked was if the voter returned the ballot. Many (who did receive a ballot) said yes, which Braynard says is a red flag because the state did not receive it and their vote was not counted.

Matt Braynard: “We’re hoping that by making this State discovery that will lead to judicial remedies that could bring greater scrutiny to the election such as signature evaluation or manual recounts, as well as law enforcement to look into exactly who requested those ballots. And then, if the people did mail them back in, or why they didn’t get counted, why they didn’t make it to the clerk’s office.”

Braynard says his analysis should have been done before the election by cleaning up voter rolls to remove ineligible voters—and during the election by objecting to ballots that should not be counted. He says once the ballots are taken out of the absentee envelopes, it’s hard to remedy the problem, short of a judge ordering a complete do-over of the election.
The issue regarding the physical address versus a P.O. box masquerading as a physical location might be prohibited in some states for voter registration but it's hardly sinister. Lots of people use companies that provide physical addresses with a box/unit number specifically so that it doesn't appear as a P.O. box. Some of the stores that provide this service also are able to act as an agent for service of process (they can access service of legal documents on behalf of the owner of the box) so there are many advantages to a person using services such as this that doesn't indicate anything nefarious.

So do they know how many people who requested a ballot for which there is no record that it was returned, and what percentage of voters that number represents if indeed their vote went uncounted? In other words, while this definitely needs to be looked into and way prior to our next election, for the current election is the number high enough to change the result of the election?
As you'll see. Trump was ready for this on many fronts.
 
In what respect are they "questionable"? Your hyperlink wouldn't allow me to read the article without entering my email address which I declined to do.

A data analyst performed 35 experiments in 5 states regarding voter data in the presidential election. According to his findings, in at least three of the states the number of questionable or potentially fraudulent ballots exceeds the vote margin between Trump and Biden.

The leader of the Voter Integrity Project and former Trump Data and Strategy Director, Matt Braynard, explained his findings in an interview with Crossroads host Joshua Philipp. Braynard said he found over 1,000 voters in Georgia who listed themselves at addresses that are post offices or other facilities the Postal Service leases or owns like FedEx or UPS stores. They also disguised their PO boxes as apartments.

Matt Braynard: “So rather than saying PO box 123, the address is listed as Apartment 123. And that’s a major red flag. And what’s also remarkable about these individuals, is that almost all of them voted early absentee, very few voted in person. So that really raises a red flag because they’re illegally registered. And it’s—and not just incidentally, but intentionally meant to deceive by listing suite number or unit number rather than technically what it is, which is a box number.”

For example, a voter listed his or her address as 724 Charlie Smith Senior Highway, Saint Marys, Georgia, Apartment 5402.

According to the Federal Voting Assistance Program, when requesting an absentee ballot, a PO box cannot be used as a mailing address.

Now on to Pennsylvania. Braynard had teams call people the state marked as having received a ballot request, but from whom the state never got the actual ballot. In other words people who supposedly requested a ballot, but it never arrived to be counted in their name.

Matt Braynard: “The first question we asked is, did you actually request that ballot? And in many cases, they said no, which is a big red flag because somebody had to request that ballot. And by law, it had to be them or somebody that they designated legally to do so.”

Here is an example of a call his team made to a Pennsylvania resident.

“We show that *BLEEP* in the state of Pennsylvania is marked as having received an absentee ballot request from you but did not receive your absentee ballot. Did you request an absentee ballot?”

Resident: “No.”


The second question they asked was if the voter returned the ballot. Many (who did receive a ballot) said yes, which Braynard says is a red flag because the state did not receive it and their vote was not counted.

Matt Braynard: “We’re hoping that by making this State discovery that will lead to judicial remedies that could bring greater scrutiny to the election such as signature evaluation or manual recounts, as well as law enforcement to look into exactly who requested those ballots. And then, if the people did mail them back in, or why they didn’t get counted, why they didn’t make it to the clerk’s office.”

Braynard says his analysis should have been done before the election by cleaning up voter rolls to remove ineligible voters—and during the election by objecting to ballots that should not be counted. He says once the ballots are taken out of the absentee envelopes, it’s hard to remedy the problem, short of a judge ordering a complete do-over of the election.
The issue regarding the physical address versus a P.O. box masquerading as a physical location might be prohibited in some states for voter registration but it's hardly sinister. Lots of people use companies that provide physical addresses with a box/unit number specifically so that it doesn't appear as a P.O. box. Some of the stores that provide this service also are able to act as an agent for service of process (they can access service of legal documents on behalf of the owner of the box) so there are many advantages to a person using services such as this that doesn't indicate anything nefarious.

So do they know how many people who requested a ballot for which there is no record that it was returned, and what percentage of voters that number represents if indeed their vote went uncounted? In other words, while this definitely needs to be looked into and way prior to our next election, for the current election is the number high enough to change the result of the election?
As you'll see. Trump was ready for this on many fronts.
When will anyone see this?

Been hearing lots of promises of what is to come and so far nothing but lame videos about potentials and raids in Germany and people who may or may not be missing.
 
Watch some so called moderator move this to the conspiracy theory board.

Lord, let the hidden things come to light. May the lying lips be silenced which speak arrogantly against the righteous with pride and contempt. Lord, deliver us from evil. Deliver America from this attempted takeover and may truth and justice reign.
trump22.jpg
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top