The next liberal orgasm over Trump’s cases

[okfine]

^ leftist who just can't deal. Pretty soon OKfuck will be whining like Sotomayor.

You be the fool.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

You be the fool.

And you be the tool, ya fish eyed foo!

 

[BackAgain]

You're so stupid you can't answer a simple fn question.

You’re so retarded you fail to note that I did answer your fuckin stupid question.

 

[okfine]

You’re so retarded you fail to note that I did answer your fuckin stupid question.

nope. You answered with questions.

 

[BackAgain]

The case is based on fraud charges. There's no separate entity called commercial law.

There is in fact a commercial part.

Also, despite the idiotic “ruling” from the ignorant judge, it remains absolutely true that there cannot legally be any fraud (civil or criminal) absent a “victim.”

There were no victims — even assuming (which we shouldn’t) that any of Trump’s valuations were erroneous.

 

[BackAgain]

nope. You answered with questions.

There you go.

And to any thinking person ( a class from which you are obviously excluded) it would be clear that the answer is found therein.

 

[d0gbreath]

"HEY EVERYBODY!! I AM A FUCKING IDIOT!!"

No you're not Long. There is a section inside of business law that's called commercial law. DJ's charges fall under criminal law. So, the judge is fine.

 

[leftwinger]

Bottom Line: It is the Deep State vs. American Taxpayers. (they get rich working with American enemy countries such as Iran and China).

They cheated the 2020 vote to deny our vote. They are now attacking our recent President using the power of the the DOJ. We can't seem to do anything about it. Board maggots taunt and lie, parrot the filthy MSM for 4 straight years.
It is a disgusting set of circumstances. Not sure it can be solved short of armed rebellion?

 

[d0gbreath]

There is in fact a commercial part.

Also, despite the idiotic “ruling” from the ignorant judge, it remains absolutely true that there cannot legally be any fraud (civil or criminal) absent a “victim.”

There were no victims — even assuming (which we shouldn’t) that any of Trump’s valuations were erroneous.

The victims are everyone else that has to play by the rules.

 

[leftwinger]

The victims are everyone else that has to play by the rules.

BS. Then every businessman in America is due in Court. You don't go "enforce some vague BS charge" without any victims to harrass those who are not in the Deep State. Sod off.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

No you're not Long. There is a section inside of business law that's called commercial law. DJ's charges fall under criminal law. So, the judge is fine.

The fraud case in NYC is a civil matter, you ignorant cock face.

 

[d0gbreath]

BS. Then every businessman in America is due in Court. You don't go "enforce some vague BS charge" without any victims to harrass those who are not in the Deep State. Sod off.

Every businessman did not over evaluate their stuff to get over.

 

[d0gbreath]

The fraud case in NYC is a civil matter, you ignorant cock face.

Call me another name while shoving a sledge hammer down your pants.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Call me another name while shoving a sledge hammer down your pants.

I want you to come clean and admit that you don't have a clue about this subject.

 

[BackAgain]

The victims are everyone else that has to play by the rules.

That’s a trite, nonsensical and bogus answer.

There’s actually no credible evidence that he didn’t play by the rules. And nobody was injured just because he got some loans.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Look at how breathlessly CNN reports on this bullshit case:

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/30/politics/trump-fraud-trial-verdict-what-to-watch-for/index.html

All the libtards are moaning (in unison):

“Oh God! Oh God! Yes! Yes! YES! Don’t stop. I think I’m gonna cum! YEEEESSSSS!”

Pa-fucking-thetic.

I wonder if they grasp how shitty of a judge Engoron was and how likely it is that his “ruling” and ultimate verdict are going to be overturned?

Lefties will only follow the law, the Lefty law.

 

[d0gbreath]

I want you to come clean and admit that you don't have a clue about this subject.

Neither do you. We'll both just have to wait and see what amount the Judge hammers DJ with, because he didn't get a jury, because Habba wasn't faking smart that day.

 

[d0gbreath]

That’s a trite, nonsensical and bogus answer.

There’s actually no credible evidence that he didn’t play by the rules. And nobody was injured just because he got some loans.

So his 30,000 sq. ft. penthouse, that's 10,000 sq. ft. isn't credible evidence?

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[Care4all]

View attachment 895817

If it took place in NewYork, and he defamed her on the sexual abuse she claimed,, and she won her case in civil court, and Clinton continued defaming her within hours after the libel verdict, and Clinton is worth $3-10 billion, and $63 million was needed as punitive damages to shut Clinton up, then yes, Broderick could sue him for boo coos of money.

otherwise though, it took place in Arkansas which likely does not have this New York State law, on their books.