The Most Famous Fakes In Science

People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans.

While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation.

One interesting nutrition based changes has been onset ages of puberty in Asian females. Only two generations ago, the average onset of puberty in an Korean or Japanese girl was 17 or 18 years-old. Because of an increase in fat and dairy in the diet, that has gone down to be more in line with the Western onset of 13 or 14 years-old.


That is not evolution.
 
What if you believed in unscientific principles.... gods, Spaghetti Monsters, or the like... and became aware that supporting such crap requires only lazy lies and fabrications like "FAITH"?
Would you continue to believe it?
Of course you do.
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…
Okay, you've convinced me.

Now, what is your personal theory on how we got here? Precisely?


Darwin has nothing to do with 'how we got here'...how life began. It is provided as an explanation for the diversity of life as it appears now.

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Darwin's is without proof, and in many ways, disproven.

The real question is why it is sooooo important for certain ideologies to claim science has found the explanation for speciation when, as of now, it has not.


Why is Darwin so important to a certain political view?
So you don't want to tell me? Is this another secret?

How do you think we got here? What is your best personal guess? Or perhaps you're like me, and you admit you don't know?


I did tell you.


It appears that you're too dense for this topic.

Okay, so you're a Christian.

:)


Why is that of importance to you?

Are you planning to propose?


I should tell you now, you could be a chocolate covered millionaire, giving away free shoes, and the answer would still be no.



Can you take a hint?
 
People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans.

While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation.

One interesting nutrition based changes has been onset ages of puberty in Asian females. Only two generations ago, the average onset of puberty in an Korean or Japanese girl was 17 or 18 years-old. Because of an increase in fat and dairy in the diet, that has gone down to be more in line with the Western onset of 13 or 14 years-old.


That is not evolution.

That's what I said.
 
People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans.

While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation.

One interesting nutrition based changes has been onset ages of puberty in Asian females. Only two generations ago, the average onset of puberty in an Korean or Japanese girl was 17 or 18 years-old. Because of an increase in fat and dairy in the diet, that has gone down to be more in line with the Western onset of 13 or 14 years-old.
It's all evolution, just like I used to eat meat, but my thinking evolved towards a healthier lifestyle and now I'm a vegetarian. That's another example of someone evolving, and it's following down my family tree as my children don't eat meat either.

I think you're being deliberately obtuse.
 
What if you believed in unscientific principles.... gods, Spaghetti Monsters, or the like... and became aware that supporting such crap requires only lazy lies and fabrications like "FAITH"?
Would you continue to believe it?
Of course you do.


This appears to be the usual dumb response that is one more 'I hate you.'

I can't tell you how deeply hurt I am.

Can you guess why I can't tell you that?
 
People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans.

While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation.

One interesting nutrition based changes has been onset ages of puberty in Asian females. Only two generations ago, the average onset of puberty in an Korean or Japanese girl was 17 or 18 years-old. Because of an increase in fat and dairy in the diet, that has gone down to be more in line with the Western onset of 13 or 14 years-old.


That is not evolution.

That's what I said.


No you didn't.


No new species in your post.
 
People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans.

While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation.

One interesting nutrition based changes has been onset ages of puberty in Asian females. Only two generations ago, the average onset of puberty in an Korean or Japanese girl was 17 or 18 years-old. Because of an increase in fat and dairy in the diet, that has gone down to be more in line with the Western onset of 13 or 14 years-old.


That is not evolution.

That's what I said.


No you didn't.


No new species in your post.

" While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation. "
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…
Okay, you've convinced me.

Now, what is your personal theory on how we got here? Precisely?


Darwin has nothing to do with 'how we got here'...how life began. It is provided as an explanation for the diversity of life as it appears now.

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Darwin's is without proof, and in many ways, disproven.

The real question is why it is sooooo important for certain ideologies to claim science has found the explanation for speciation when, as of now, it has not.


Why is Darwin so important to a certain political view?
So you don't want to tell me? Is this another secret?

How do you think we got here? What is your best personal guess? Or perhaps you're like me, and you admit you don't know?


I did tell you.


It appears that you're too dense for this topic.

Okay, so you're a Christian.

:)


Why is that of importance to you?

Are you planning to propose?


I should tell you now, you could be a chocolate covered millionaire, giving away free shoes, and the answer would still be no.



Can you take a hint?
That's okay, sweetie. You'll often play this game, and you'll often quote the Bible, but you carefully stop there.

You're not the first person to fraudulently use religion as a weapon, and you won't be the last.

You and the Jihadis, peas in a pod, huh?
 
What if you believed in unscientific principles.... gods, Spaghetti Monsters, or the like... and became aware that supporting such crap requires only lazy lies and fabrications like "FAITH"?
Would you continue to believe it?
Of course you do.


This appears to be the usual dumb response that is one more 'I hate you.'

I can't tell you how deeply hurt I am.

Can you guess why I can't tell you that?
So typical "It's all about ME!" narcissism. Get help.
 
What if you believed in a scientific principle....and became aware that it is only supported with lies and fabrications.
Would you continue to believe it?
It is....and you do. I'll prove it in this thread.



1.It would be amusing if it weren’t so tragic: the lies that have been perpetrated in government school. Like this...

“Evolution is a fact.” Science Believers

And this…

“Evolution [Darwin’s Theory] is a fact and is the basis of all of biology. The theory of evolution is the most robust, well supported scientific theory in the history of mankind.” The Pretense Called Evolution




2. The ’proof’ offered by a number of those fooled is the fossil record, and the mechanism of mutations, both of which have been proven false. Proof can be found here:

The Pretense Called Evolution

and

The Biology Term For History

Both scrupulously documented and supported.



3. The reason this thread should be in Politics, not Science, is because Darwin’s plan, colloquially referred to as evolution, is that it, like the hallmark of politics, is based on lies.
In fact, that alone should make every person of integrity furious! And curious….’why would lies be necessary whether the theory is true or not?’ What makes advancing it so important?



4. One example is this, from the textbook currently used in NYC high schools, and probably throughout the nation:

“By examining fossils from sequential layers of rock, one could view how a species had changed and produced different species over time.” Kenneth R. Miller and Joseph S. Levine, Prentice Hall Biology (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2002), 382.

The actual fossil record shows the opposite of Darwin’s beliefs: " A few of the gaps (which are systematic in the fossil record) they claim to fill, but there’s another deposit in the region that throws the whole evolutionary story into disrepute: the Chengyiang bed in southern China. Here, the Cambrian Explosion has been documented in fine detail; all the major animal phyla appear in the early Cambrian without precursors."
Chinese Fossil Beds Astound Paleontologists (http://www.nature.com/index.html?file=/nature/journal/v421/n6925/full/nature01420_fs.html)

Entirely new lines simply materialize without the myriad failed changes that Darwin predicted.


And, why is it acceptable, or necessary, to lie to make the point?
But there is an even greater fabrication used to advance Darwinian beliefs....you learned it....and believed it….I’ll get to it…
Okay, you've convinced me.

Now, what is your personal theory on how we got here? Precisely?


Darwin has nothing to do with 'how we got here'...how life began. It is provided as an explanation for the diversity of life as it appears now.

There are numerous theories, a number of which I have noted in the past.

Darwin's is without proof, and in many ways, disproven.

The real question is why it is sooooo important for certain ideologies to claim science has found the explanation for speciation when, as of now, it has not.


Why is Darwin so important to a certain political view?
So you don't want to tell me? Is this another secret?

How do you think we got here? What is your best personal guess? Or perhaps you're like me, and you admit you don't know?


I did tell you.


It appears that you're too dense for this topic.

Okay, so you're a Christian.

:)


Why is that of importance to you?

Are you planning to propose?


I should tell you now, you could be a chocolate covered millionaire, giving away free shoes, and the answer would still be no.



Can you take a hint?
That's okay, sweetie. You'll often play this game, and you'll often quote the Bible, but you carefully stop there.

You're not the first person to fraudulently use religion as a weapon, and you won't be the last.

You and the Jihadis, peas in a pod, huh?


There is nothing about religion in my posts.

You are lying because I've embarrassed you again.
 
What if you believed in unscientific principles.... gods, Spaghetti Monsters, or the like... and became aware that supporting such crap requires only lazy lies and fabrications like "FAITH"?
Would you continue to believe it?
Of course you do.


This appears to be the usual dumb response that is one more 'I hate you.'

I can't tell you how deeply hurt I am.

Can you guess why I can't tell you that?
So typical "It's all about ME!" narcissism. Get help.


How can I help being so when they only competition here is the lowest level....you.
 
Now, what is your personal theory on how we got here? Precisely?

Darwin didn't create Theory of Evolution. He just explained it (which he became famous for) and now we are finding out that he was WRONG. He was practically wrong about everything and was a racist to boot. His ideas led to social Darwinism, eugenics (Darwin supported his cousin Frances Galton), Hitler, and the Holocaust. His ideas led to black genocide through abortions and Planned Parenthood, i.e. liberal causes.
 
Science is like religion, the origins of the universe and mankind are all theories...

Theories are the best ideas that fit the available data. Unlike religion however, when the data changes, the theories must change as well.
 
I'll bet that the lie exposed in this post is one every government school grad is familiar with.


5. Many have learned this phrase: “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny.”

“The theory of recapitulation, also called the biogenetic law or embryological parallelism—often expressed using Ernst Haeckel's phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"—is a historical hypothesis that the development of the embryo of an animal, from fertilization to gestation or hatching (ontogeny), goes through stages resembling or representing successive adult stages in the evolution of the animal's remote ancestors (phylogeny).” Recapitulation theory - Wikipedia




And the phrase is based on a diagram that I’ll bet you saw in school, and in textbooks:

1593088411305.png


Phylotypic stage - Wikipedia



What If I can show that the entire view is bogus…..and those using it know it?

Check out the title of the thread.
 
People were a lot smaller back then, meaning that over time, we're evolving to be taller humans.

While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation.

One interesting nutrition based changes has been onset ages of puberty in Asian females. Only two generations ago, the average onset of puberty in an Korean or Japanese girl was 17 or 18 years-old. Because of an increase in fat and dairy in the diet, that has gone down to be more in line with the Western onset of 13 or 14 years-old.


That is not evolution.

That's what I said.


No you didn't.


No new species in your post.

" While their are examples of human evolution in recent times, brown fat for example, but human average heights are more a function of changes and improvements in diets than with genetic mutation. "


Still no new species.

All human beings can interbreed.
 
Science is like religion, the origins of the universe and mankind are all theories...

Theories are the best ideas that fit the available data. Unlike religion however, when the data changes, the theories must change as well.
Yet, all they do is attempt to find an answer to the past.

I'm not sure we will know precisely how life on Earth started. I could be molecular biology or it could be the hand of G-d. But, we shouldn't stop theorizing based on the best available evidence.
 
Now, what is your personal theory on how we got here? Precisely?

Darwin didn't create Theory of Evolution. He just explained it (which he became famous for) and now we are finding out that he was WRONG. He was practically wrong about everything and was a racist to boot. His ideas led to social Darwinism, eugenics (Darwin supported his cousin Frances Galton), Hitler, and the Holocaust. His ideas led to black genocide through abortions and Planned Parenthood, i.e. liberal causes.



The major antithesis of religion, communism and all of its iterations, has a need to banish religion… One of the first readers of 'On the Origin of Species' was Friedrich Engels, then living in Manchester. He wrote to Karl Marx: "Darwin, by the way, whom I’m reading just now, is absolutely splendid. There was one aspect of teleology that had yet to be demolished, and that has now been done. Never before has so grandiose an attempt been made to demonstrate historical evolution in Nature, and certainly never to such good effect."
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, "Marx-Engels Collected Works" , vol. 40, p. 441.
 

Forum List

Back
Top