The Most Documented Genocide In History

[BackAgain]

define 'genocide' here plz......~S~

Why? Don’t you know the actual definition?

genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion, or race.

Genocide | Definition, Examples, & Facts | Britannica

Genocide, the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group of people because of their ethnicity, nationality, religion, or race. The term was derived from the Greek genos (‘race,’ ‘tribe,’ or ‘nation’) and the Latin cide (‘killing’). Learn more about the history of genocide in this article.

www.britannica.com

genocide​

noun​

geno·cide ˈje-nə-ˌsīd

Synonyms of genocide
: the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group

Definition of GENOCIDE

the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Note: I reject out of hand the revised addition offered by the U.N. The U.N. Is a diseased and irrelevant to reality.

 

[sparky]

Why? Don’t you know the actual definition?

yes BA

i'm asking folks what theirs may be

~S~

 

[BackAgain]

yes BA

i'm asking folks what theirs may be

~S~

Until the UN put its thumb on the scale, it was well know. And it still is.

Some folks (like fuckstick) wish to pretend otherwise.

When the same word is muddled by a number of conflicting “definitions,” the word loses meaning. And of course, that’s what scumbags like fuckstick desire.

 

[JGalt]

define 'genocide' here plz......~S~

Genocide would be if Israel were trying to invade Lebanon, Syria, or Jordan, seize hold of their territory, and eliminate all the people. Gaza and West bank are not separate individual sovereign countries in themselves. They are both part of Israel, and Hezbollah is using Lebanon as a shield from which they are launching their missile attacks. Therefore if Lebanon cannot control what happens in their own country, Israel has every right to retaliate to those attacks.

 

[sparky]

Until the UN put its thumb on the scale, it was well know. And it still is.

So the UN is guilty of redefining the term BA?

Genocide would be if Israel were trying to invade Lebanon, Syria, or Jordan, seize hold of their territory, and eliminate all the people.

So isolation to any given piece of land is a disqualifier?

Anyone else?

~S~

 

[BackAgain]

So the UN is guilty of redefining the term BA?

Yes. You don’t need to ask. Just look at what the U.N. now tries to foist off on us. Compare it to the actual definition I cited from different reliable sources.

Why?

What’s your view?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Carry on with your depraved delusions embrace your terrorism.

That one sure didn't go over very well, did it, Arab Britboi.

 

[Deadstick]

Genocide would be if Israel were trying to invade Lebanon, Syria, or Jordan, seize hold of their territory, and eliminate all the people. Gaza and West bank are not separate individual sovereign countries in themselves. They are both part of Israel, and Hezbollah is using Lebanon as a shield from which they are launching their missile attacks. Therefore if Lebanon cannot control what happens in their own country, Israel has every right to retaliate to those attacks.

Hezbollah didn't exist until the brutal Israeli invasion in 1982, that was another time you carried out Genocide, so your argument is bankrupt.

 

[Deadstick]

Until the UN put its thumb on the scale, it was well know. And it still is.

Some folks (like fuckstick) wish to pretend otherwise.

When the same word is muddled by a number of conflicting “definitions,” the word loses meaning. And of course, that’s what scumbags like fuckstick desire.

You still here arsehole?

 

[JGalt]

Hezbollah didn't exist until the brutal Israeli invasion in 1982, that was another time you carried out Genocide, so your argument is bankrupt.

There was still the PLO, Hamas, and other terrorist factions, so your point is irrelevant.

Terrorists are still terrorists, no matter what they name themselves.

 

[Deadstick]

You just want to argue, go away.

Damn right i want to argue with you Genocidal arseholes.

 

[sparky]

What’s your view?

That folks are redefining genocide to fit their political stripe BA

They do, however , differ greatly from those international org's of which we can call the 'court of world opinion'

This would be more than just the UN or UNSC, add ICC, CPPCG, along with a multitude of ad hoc tribunals

~S~

 

[Deadstick]

There was still the PLO, Hamas, and other terrorist factions, so your point is irrelevant.

Terrorists are still terrorists, no matter what they name themselves.

Not terrorists resistance fighters, if a bunch of foreigners turned up in your town and told you they were taking your home and land and would kill you if you resisted what would you do? and it still doesn't change the fact there was no Hezbollah until 1982 after Israel invaded and watched while thousands of Palestinians were murdered in Sabra and Shatila massacre, Israel has been bombing Syria for years and still occupy part of the Golan, they are not victims.

 

[Deadstick]

No. Hamas and Hezbollah are not partisans or "freedom fighters."

They are terrorists.

That is what the Nazis said about the fighters in the Ghetto, they called them bandits, it's what they said about the French resistance they called them terrorists, your argument is no different from the Nazis.

 

[sparky]

Terrorists are still terrorists, no matter what they name themselves.

>>

What is the definition of terrorism?


Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.

~S~

 

[JGalt]

Not terrorists resistance fighters, if a bunch of foreigners turned up in your town and told you they were taking your home and land and would kill you if you resisted what would you do? and it still doesn't change the fact there was no Hezbollah until 1982 after Israel invaded and watched while thousands of Palestinians were murdered in Sabra and Shatila massacre, Israel has been bombing Syria for years and still occupy part of the Golan, they are not victims.

If you're so adamant about it, why don't you go join the "resistance", instead of griping about it and wasting bandwidth on some obscure discussion board?

 

[sparky]

So were the BLM riots resistance fighters JG?

~S~

 

[JGalt]

So were the BLM riots resistance fighters JG?

~S~

No, they were domestic terrorists, just like Antifa.

 

[gipper]

There is no Genocide occurring.

There are just Islamist terrorist catch phrases created for useful idiots to parrot.

If your nation of Israel kills 500,000 Palestinian children, do you continue to support it?

 

[sparky]

No, they were domestic terrorists, just like Antifa.

sure, but in their shoes they thought far differently

but i digress, lets go back to 1770's and those uppity colonists as further flame fodder

The Brits would attack in line formation, while we (the colonists) would snipe them (the introduction of a grooved barrel increasing range) hiding behind cover

The Brit's considered them terrorists , unfit for tribunal , while the colonists considered them freedom fighters

~S~