The More We Learn, the Less Room There is for Evolution

[CrusaderFrank]

I grew up Roman Catholic. Did you mean changing water into wine is evidence of evolution

How do Catholics think land animals got here?

You never read Genesis?

Do you believe Genesis is to be understood literally. IOW, did all of those events literally happen?

Genesis is an allegory, it's a coded message. Of course the events happened literally

I'm confused. You mean DIDN'T happen literally, right?

If it's an allegory then it didn't really happen: a story, poem, or picture that can be interpreted to reveal a hidden meaning, typically a moral or political one. So these are stories with messages behind them.

Those ancient men couldn't have imagined evolution. They couldn't understand where we came from and how we got here. Best they could come up with was the Genesis story. Only one problem with it. In order to believe it you have to believe God poofed adult animals into existence. That's not science that ignorant fairy tales.

Imagine fully grown adults believing that a god poofed the deer, giraffe, dinosaurs, coo coo birds, wooly mammouth, birds, frogs, snakes, monkey, beatles, ants, mosquitos, trilobites, duck billed platipus. He poofed all of them into existence one day. They weren't raised by parents. They just arrived suddenly as full grown zebra, turtles, cats, moose, bear, tigers, seals. Magically.

Full grown adults need to study Kabbalah to understand the story behind the Genesis story.

Steve Ross created Related, do you think his project was Hudson Yards?

 

[SixFoot]

I've never doubted the possibility. It seems logical that different sites containing the same organic materials could produce chains of information with similarities between the different offshoots.

We can observe a Finch evolve into a different kind of Finch, but we will never see one evolve into a turtle. Until a species becomes one not of its own kind, the answers we have come up with are lacking at best in my book.

I did a quick search for how all living things are related and there is just so much evidence against you're and Ben Carson's position. It's amazing he passed doctor school

Who the heck is Ben Carson?

Black guy who ran for GOP. I googled the question about one species turning into another and he said that nonsense. There's so much evidence we are related.

And again it doesn't matter because you must believe all life on land originally lived in the water. If not explain to me how the first land animals got started.

Oh, that guy. lol I've been unplugged for a while.

Anyway, none of that matters to me if we can't pinpoint the actual origin of anything. It's all to be taken with a healthy dose of objective skepticism and a desire to continue learning, even after I think I've found the "correct" answer. That's the point of science if you ask me.

Yes, but denying overwhelming evidence is not the point of science. There are all too many fossils where we have found very good transition specimens . And more being found as we post.

Well, now you're just projecting. lol I've not denied a thing.

 

[Weatherman2020]

For the past few decades most of the DNA was considered filler, and evolutionists claimed it was how DNA had the ability to become more diverse.

But now we know that everything within DNA has a purpose.

In January, Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, made a comment that revealed just how far the consensus has moved. At a health care conference in San Francisco, an audience member asked him about junk DNA. “We don’t use that term anymore,” Collins replied. “It was pretty much a case of hubris to imagine that we could dispense with any part of the genome — as if we knew enough to say it wasn’t functional.” Most of the DNA that scientists once thought was just taking up space in the genome, Collins said, “turns out to be doing stuff.”

Is Most of Our DNA Garbage?

Still no empirical evidence of any species turning into another species, either.

Well it's already happened millions of years ago. The atmosphere was different back then. More carbon dioxide or monoxide. Point is science has an answer for that.

What about a duck billed web feet platipus? Seems stuck in the middle, no?

And OK, how about this? They found a new bacteria at the bottom of the Dead Sea. Maybe there was a mammal bacteria, bird, reptile, amphibians. Maybe they were all started separately. Still they all crawled out of the water and became what they are today.

If not, how did the first giraffe get here? Were they babies to start off? How did they get here?

I've never doubted the possibility. It seems logical that different sites containing the same organic materials could produce chains of information with similarities between the different offshoots.

We can observe a Finch evolve into a different kind of Finch, but we will never see one evolve into a turtle. Until a species becomes one not of its own kind, the answers we have come up with are lacking at best in my book.

There are fossils in the Karoo that clearly show the evolution of the therapsids to mammals.

http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/jspui/bitstream/10539/16395/1/1997.V33.GOW.KAROO FOSSILS MAMMAL ORIGINS.pdf

Linking to propaganda proves nothing. I can just as easily link to a report saying the opposite.

Fact remains, there are many species around today that are just like their ancestors from "millions of years" ago. Evolution of one species into another is a myth.

 

[ScienceRocks]

The more we learn the more retarded the Bible, Koran and the Torah sound....

Evolution sound damn near college level next to that caveman shit. I don't care if it isn't perfect either.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The more we learn the more retarded the Bible, Koran and the Torah sound....

Evolution sound damn near college level next to that caveman shit. I don't care if it isn't perfect either.

Many feel threatened knowing they will be held accountable to a higher authority.

 

[guno]

this evidently was the ops elementary school science text

Landover-Baptizon.com: buying info: Donkeys Can Talk (Creation Science For Teens)

 

[Weatherman2020]

this evidently was the ops elementary school science text

Landover-Baptizon.com: buying info: Donkeys Can Talk (Creation Science For Teens)

We'll file that with your talking snake.

 

[Syriusly]

For the past few decades most of the DNA was considered filler, and evolutionists claimed it was how DNA had the ability to become more diverse.

But now we know that everything within DNA has a purpose.

In January, Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, made a comment that revealed just how far the consensus has moved. At a health care conference in San Francisco, an audience member asked him about junk DNA. “We don’t use that term anymore,” Collins replied. “It was pretty much a case of hubris to imagine that we could dispense with any part of the genome — as if we knew enough to say it wasn’t functional.” Most of the DNA that scientists once thought was just taking up space in the genome, Collins said, “turns out to be doing stuff.”

Is Most of Our DNA Garbage?

Still no empirical evidence of any species turning into another species, either.

Sure there is.

You fairytalists just deny it.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Hell, I'll put the African witch doctor on a higher level then a 2,000 year old book with no supporting evidence. Why? At least they have some idea about helping people with what little they have.

 

[Syriusly]

For the past few decades most of the DNA was considered filler, and evolutionists claimed it was how DNA had the ability to become more diverse.

But now we know that everything within DNA has a purpose.

In January, Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, made a comment that revealed just how far the consensus has moved. At a health care conference in San Francisco, an audience member asked him about junk DNA. “We don’t use that term anymore,” Collins replied. “It was pretty much a case of hubris to imagine that we could dispense with any part of the genome — as if we knew enough to say it wasn’t functional.” Most of the DNA that scientists once thought was just taking up space in the genome, Collins said, “turns out to be doing stuff.”

Is Most of Our DNA Garbage?

Still no empirical evidence of any species turning into another species, either.

Well it's already happened millions of years ago. The atmosphere was different back then. More carbon dioxide or monoxide. Point is science has an answer for that.

What about a duck billed web feet platipus? Seems stuck in the middle, no?

And OK, how about this? They found a new bacteria at the bottom of the Dead Sea. Maybe there was a mammal bacteria, bird, reptile, amphibians. Maybe they were all started separately. Still they all crawled out of the water and became what they are today.

If not, how did the first giraffe get here? Were they babies to start off? How did they get here?

I've never doubted the possibility. It seems logical that different sites containing the same organic materials could produce chains of information with similarities between the different offshoots.

We can observe a Finch evolve into a different kind of Finch, but we will never see one evolve into a turtle. Until a species becomes one not of its own kind, the answers we have come up with are lacking at best in my book.

There are over 183 species of Finch- all evolved from common ancestors- all are different species.

All evolved from common ancestors. None will ever 'evolve' into a Turtle- anymore than you will birth your grandfather.

 

[Syriusly]

this evidently was the ops elementary school science text

Landover-Baptizon.com: buying info: Donkeys Can Talk (Creation Science For Teens)

We'll file that with your talking snake.

Ah you finally came back after running away.

LOL

Thanks for previously posting another view supporting the theory of evolution:

Quoting your article:
Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.

Collins directly contradicts everything you have said in this thread- and all of your threads denying evolution.

 

[Syriusly]

For the past few decades most of the DNA was considered filler, and evolutionists claimed it was how DNA had the ability to become more diverse.

But now we know that everything within DNA has a purpose.

In January, Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, made a comment that revealed just how far the consensus has moved. At a health care conference in San Francisco, an audience member asked him about junk DNA. “We don’t use that term anymore,” Collins replied. “It was pretty much a case of hubris to imagine that we could dispense with any part of the genome — as if we knew enough to say it wasn’t functional.” Most of the DNA that scientists once thought was just taking up space in the genome, Collins said, “turns out to be doing stuff.”

Is Most of Our DNA Garbage?

Still no empirical evidence of any species turning into another species, either.

Well it's already happened millions of years ago. The atmosphere was different back then. More carbon dioxide or monoxide. Point is science has an answer for that.

What about a duck billed web feet platipus? Seems stuck in the middle, no?

And OK, how about this? They found a new bacteria at the bottom of the Dead Sea. Maybe there was a mammal bacteria, bird, reptile, amphibians. Maybe they were all started separately. Still they all crawled out of the water and became what they are today.

If not, how did the first giraffe get here? Were they babies to start off? How did they get here?

I've never doubted the possibility. It seems logical that different sites containing the same organic materials could produce chains of information with similarities between the different offshoots.

We can observe a Finch evolve into a different kind of Finch, but we will never see one evolve into a turtle. Until a species becomes one not of its own kind, the answers we have come up with are lacking at best in my book.

There are fossils in the Karoo that clearly show the evolution of the therapsids to mammals.

http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/jspui/bitstream/10539/16395/1/1997.V33.GOW.KAROO FOSSILS MAMMAL ORIGINS.pdf

Linking to propaganda proves nothing. I can just as easily link to a report saying the opposite.

Fact remains, there are many species around today that are just like their ancestors from "millions of years" ago. Evolution of one species into another is a myth.

Your denial doesn't make it a myth- you fairytalists are the ones who believe in myths.

Here is another Christian- and scientist who believes in evolution:

Thanks for posting another view supporting the theory of evolution:

Quoting your article:
Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.

Collins directly contradicts everything you have said in this thread- and all of your threads denying evolution.

 

[Weatherman2020]

this evidently was the ops elementary school science text

Landover-Baptizon.com: buying info: Donkeys Can Talk (Creation Science For Teens)

We'll file that with your talking snake.

Ah you finally came back after running away.

LOL

Thanks for previously posting another view supporting the theory of evolution:

Quoting your article:
Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.

Collins directly contradicts everything you have said in this thread- and all of your threads denying evolution.

Collins has his opinion on a field outside his speciality, but he still says God did it.

 

[Syriusly]

The more we learn the more retarded the Bible, Koran and the Torah sound....

Evolution sound damn near college level next to that caveman shit. I don't care if it isn't perfect either.

Many feel threatened knowing they will be held accountable to a higher authority.

Many take comfort in believing in fairy tales.

 

[Syriusly]

this evidently was the ops elementary school science text

Landover-Baptizon.com: buying info: Donkeys Can Talk (Creation Science For Teens)

We'll file that with your talking snake.

Ah you finally came back after running away.

LOL

Thanks for previously posting another view supporting the theory of evolution:

Quoting your article:
Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things.

Collins directly contradicts everything you have said in this thread- and all of your threads denying evolution.

Collins has his opinion on a field outside his speciality, but he still says God did it.

You brought Collins into this thread- not me- don't now pretend his opinion is not relevant.

You say evolution doesn't exist- Collins- a Christian- says evolution is 'clearly true'

 

[Weatherman2020]

The more we learn the more retarded the Bible, Koran and the Torah sound....

Evolution sound damn near college level next to that caveman shit. I don't care if it isn't perfect either.

Many feel threatened knowing they will be held accountable to a higher authority.

Many take comfort in believing in fairy tales.

Not my fault you want to be an ahole without fear of reprisals.

 

[guno]

The more we learn the more retarded the Bible, Koran and the Torah sound....

Evolution sound damn near college level next to that caveman shit. I don't care if it isn't perfect either.

Many feel threatened knowing they will be held accountable to a higher authority.

Many take comfort in believing in fairy tales.

Not my fault you want to be an ahole without fear of reprisals.

fear of reprisals

 

[Syriusly]

The more we learn the more retarded the Bible, Koran and the Torah sound....

Evolution sound damn near college level next to that caveman shit. I don't care if it isn't perfect either.

Many feel threatened knowing they will be held accountable to a higher authority.

Many take comfort in believing in fairy tales.

Not my fault you want to be an ahole without fear of reprisals.

Not my fault you want to be an asshole but take comfort in thinking the fairy in the sky will forgive you if you chant the magic chant.

 

[sealybobo]

For the past few decades most of the DNA was considered filler, and evolutionists claimed it was how DNA had the ability to become more diverse.

But now we know that everything within DNA has a purpose.

In January, Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, made a comment that revealed just how far the consensus has moved. At a health care conference in San Francisco, an audience member asked him about junk DNA. “We don’t use that term anymore,” Collins replied. “It was pretty much a case of hubris to imagine that we could dispense with any part of the genome — as if we knew enough to say it wasn’t functional.” Most of the DNA that scientists once thought was just taking up space in the genome, Collins said, “turns out to be doing stuff.”

Is Most of Our DNA Garbage?

Still no empirical evidence of any species turning into another species, either.

Well it's already happened millions of years ago. The atmosphere was different back then. More carbon dioxide or monoxide. Point is science has an answer for that.

What about a duck billed web feet platipus? Seems stuck in the middle, no?

And OK, how about this? They found a new bacteria at the bottom of the Dead Sea. Maybe there was a mammal bacteria, bird, reptile, amphibians. Maybe they were all started separately. Still they all crawled out of the water and became what they are today.

If not, how did the first giraffe get here? Were they babies to start off? How did they get here?

I've never doubted the possibility. It seems logical that different sites containing the same organic materials could produce chains of information with similarities between the different offshoots.

We can observe a Finch evolve into a different kind of Finch, but we will never see one evolve into a turtle. Until a species becomes one not of its own kind, the answers we have come up with are lacking at best in my book.

There are fossils in the Karoo that clearly show the evolution of the therapsids to mammals.

http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/jspui/bitstream/10539/16395/1/1997.V33.GOW.KAROO FOSSILS MAMMAL ORIGINS.pdf

Linking to propaganda proves nothing. I can just as easily link to a report saying the opposite.

Fact remains, there are many species around today that are just like their ancestors from "millions of years" ago. Evolution of one species into another is a myth.

But you understand no land animals started out a land animal, right?? God didn't produce gerbils goats and eagles. They evolved from fish. It's true. God didn't poof them into exist

 

[sealybobo]

For the past few decades most of the DNA was considered filler, and evolutionists claimed it was how DNA had the ability to become more diverse.

But now we know that everything within DNA has a purpose.

In January, Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, made a comment that revealed just how far the consensus has moved. At a health care conference in San Francisco, an audience member asked him about junk DNA. “We don’t use that term anymore,” Collins replied. “It was pretty much a case of hubris to imagine that we could dispense with any part of the genome — as if we knew enough to say it wasn’t functional.” Most of the DNA that scientists once thought was just taking up space in the genome, Collins said, “turns out to be doing stuff.”

Is Most of Our DNA Garbage?

Still no empirical evidence of any species turning into another species, either.

Well it's already happened millions of years ago. The atmosphere was different back then. More carbon dioxide or monoxide. Point is science has an answer for that.

What about a duck billed web feet platipus? Seems stuck in the middle, no?

And OK, how about this? They found a new bacteria at the bottom of the Dead Sea. Maybe there was a mammal bacteria, bird, reptile, amphibians. Maybe they were all started separately. Still they all crawled out of the water and became what they are today.

If not, how did the first giraffe get here? Were they babies to start off? How did they get here?

I've never doubted the possibility. It seems logical that different sites containing the same organic materials could produce chains of information with similarities between the different offshoots.

We can observe a Finch evolve into a different kind of Finch, but we will never see one evolve into a turtle. Until a species becomes one not of its own kind, the answers we have come up with are lacking at best in my book.

There are fossils in the Karoo that clearly show the evolution of the therapsids to mammals.

http://wiredspace.wits.ac.za/jspui/bitstream/10539/16395/1/1997.V33.GOW.KAROO FOSSILS MAMMAL ORIGINS.pdf

Linking to propaganda proves nothing. I can just as easily link to a report saying the opposite.

Fact remains, there are many species around today that are just like their ancestors from "millions of years" ago. Evolution of one species into another is a myth.

So you say a bird species crawled out of the water and a different tiger species crawled out and human or ape species and different reptile species?

Or is your theory that god poofed all land animals into existence.

If you don't like evolution usually it's because you believe God poofed fully grown land animals onto earth. They were never babies and didn't have parents. Is that correct?