The Missile Lesson the West Can’t Ignore

Not with those missiles the range is insufficient--actually I'm surprised they tried to hit Diego Garcia as it is slightly further away than Iran's longest range missile will reach.

They did hit it.

IRAN STRIKES 4,000KM — US Base No Longer Safe​

 
Learn, what Zionism is about - and then ask me again.
After wwII, there was a UN resolution to divide Israel into a Jewish State and an Arab State. Jewish leaders accepted it Arab leaders rejected it. When Israel declared independence in 1948, Arabs invaded starting the 1948 Arab-Israli war. Palestinians lost in what they called a 'Nakba' (catastrophe) which could have been avoided if they accepted the UN resolution.

Arabs (Palestinians) could have avoided all this if they agreed to separate States. Now, they say anyone who supports Jews is somehow a 'Zionist' which is rooted in decades old lies.
 
They did hit it.

IRAN STRIKES 4,000KM — US Base No Longer Safe​


That story is hyped, Skye. Iran did shoot missiles at Diego Garcia, but one failed mid flight and the other was intercepted. Diego Garcia is at the right at the limit of the longest range missile that Iran has.

Iran launched ballistic missiles at the Diego Garcia military base, but both missiles failed to hit their target, with one intercepted and the other failing mid-flight. This incident indicates that Iran's missile capabilities may exceed previously acknowledged limits, potentially putting parts of Europe within range.
Fox News
iranintl.com

The distance from Iran to Diego Garcia is approximately 4,000 kilometers (about 2,500 miles) from the Iranian coastline to the base. If flying directly to Tehran, the distance is around 6,250 kilometers (about 3,880 miles).
ponderworthy.com
The Economic Times
 
That story is hyped, Skye. Iran did shoot missiles at Diego Garcia, but one failed mid flight and the other was intercepted. Diego Garcia is at the right at the limit of the longest range missile that Iran has.

Iran launched ballistic missiles at the Diego Garcia military base, but both missiles failed to hit their target, with one intercepted and the other failing mid-flight. This incident indicates that Iran's missile capabilities may exceed previously acknowledged limits, potentially putting parts of Europe within range.
Fox News
iranintl.com

The distance from Iran to Diego Garcia is approximately 4,000 kilometers (about 2,500 miles) from the Iranian coastline to the base. If flying directly to Tehran, the distance is around 6,250 kilometers (about 3,880 miles).
ponderworthy.com
The Economic Times



What I'm reading is what I posted....:)
 
That story is hyped, Skye. Iran did shoot missiles at Diego Garcia, but one failed mid flight and the other was intercepted. Diego Garcia is at the right at the limit of the longest range missile that Iran has.

Iran launched ballistic missiles at the Diego Garcia military base, but both missiles failed to hit their target, with one intercepted and the other failing mid-flight. This incident indicates that Iran's missile capabilities may exceed previously acknowledged limits, potentially putting parts of Europe within range.
Fox News
iranintl.com

The distance from Iran to Diego Garcia is approximately 4,000 kilometers (about 2,500 miles) from the Iranian coastline to the base. If flying directly to Tehran, the distance is around 6,250 kilometers (about 3,880 miles).
ponderworthy.com
The Economic Times

Diego Garcia was considered beyond reach — until now.
 
Diego Garcia was considered beyond reach — until now.
Well, I think they were hoping that missile would reach Diego Garcia, but I don't think THAT missile would reach it. I'm sure there are multiple countries that have missiles that could reach much further.
 
After wwII, there was a UN resolution to divide Israel into a Jewish State and an Arab State. Jewish leaders accepted it Arab leaders rejected it. When Israel declared independence in 1948, Arabs invaded starting the 1948 Arab-Israli war. Palestinians lost in what they called a 'Nakba' (catastrophe) which could have been avoided if they accepted the UN resolution.

Arabs (Palestinians) could have avoided all this if they agreed to separate States. Now, they say anyone who supports Jews is somehow a 'Zionist' which is rooted in decades old lies.
Total nonsense

The UN resolution was never valid, and "rightfully" not accepted by the Palestinians and Arabs.
Furthermore around 65% of the territory were to be given to Jews - who didn't even make up 40% of the total population.
Nor did even 20% constitute a "real" Palestinian population since more then 80% of the Jews in 1947 were not Palestinian people.

These European Jews, were like those illegal migrants in the USA - that YOU and TACO want to evict.

If the Palestinians would have accepted - the Zionists would have attacked them anyway. Just as they genocide Gaza's Palestinians and keep killing Palestinians in the West-bank and stealing their lands via illegal settlements.

You obviously haven't figured out ZIONISM and what it factually beholds. or you simply don't care.
 
I live in Ultra Rural Northeastern Shasta County ( Southern Cascades Mountain Home ) and Old Shasta / Swasey / Centerville area West of Redding ( Country Home )

Part of my family comes from Cottonwood.
 
Pure assumptions on your behalf - how many missiles with such a range do they have, 2?
And the 2 missile that were launched against Diego Garcia (range 4000km) - were NOT Khorramshahr-4's. over and out.
Listen dumb ace, the way Iran is using cluster munitions on top of a platform set up or designed for multiple baby nukes to be deployed exactly in the way that the cluster munitions are being deployed, tells us that Iran was on it's way to develope nuclear weapons that can deploy in the same way that these clusters are being deployed.

If the clusters were nukes, then Iran would be eliminated immediately. In fact they will be eliminated because they are showing the world that they would go for total annihilation of many of their neighbor's and their enemies all due to their radical beliefs.

The world can't have a nuclear Iran, and that's that.
 
After wwII, there was a UN resolution to divide Israel into a Jewish State and an Arab State. Jewish leaders accepted it Arab leaders rejected it. When Israel declared independence in 1948, Arabs invaded starting the 1948 Arab-Israli war. Palestinians lost in what they called a 'Nakba' (catastrophe) which could have been avoided if they accepted the UN resolution.

Arabs (Palestinians) could have avoided all this if they agreed to separate States. Now, they say anyone who supports Jews is somehow a 'Zionist' which is rooted in decades old lies.
Wow, don't feed them such information without a bib handy. They are going to look like slobbering idiots trying to digest the truth like that.
 
Listen dumb ace, the way Iran is using cluster munitions on top of a platform set up or designed for multiple baby nukes to be deployed exactly in the way that the cluster munitions are being deployed, tells us that Iran was on it's way to develope nuclear weapons that can deploy in the same way that these clusters are being deployed.

If the clusters were nukes, then Iran would be eliminated immediately. In fact they will be eliminated because they are showing the world that they would go for total annihilation of many of their neighbor's and their enemies all due to their radical beliefs.

The world can't have a nuclear Iran, and that's that.
One is indeed a dumb ass - to post the above.
 
15th post
Listen dumb ace, the way Iran is using cluster munitions on top of a platform set up or designed for multiple baby nukes to be deployed exactly in the way that the cluster munitions are being deployed, tells us that Iran was on it's way to develope nuclear weapons that can deploy in the same way that these clusters are being deployed.

If the clusters were nukes, then Iran would be eliminated immediately. In fact they will be eliminated because they are showing the world that they would go for total annihilation of many of their neighbor's and their enemies all due to their radical beliefs.

The world can't have a nuclear Iran, and that's that.
Kruska: One is indeed a dumb ass - to post the above.

Jake Starkey:
Iran will not be permitted to have nuclear weapons.
 
Jake Starkey: Iran will not be permitted to have nuclear weapons.
And what will you do if Iran got nuclear weapons from Russia, China or North Korea and with delivery systems able to reach US cities? How many destroyed US and Israeli cities is the price you are ready to pay for elimination of Iranian nuclear weapons?
And why Iranian nuclear weapons are lesser acceptable for you than North Korean, Pakistani, Indian or French ones?
 
And what will you do if Iran got nuclear weapons from Russia, China or North Korea and with delivery systems able to reach US cities? How many destroyed US and Israeli cities is the price you are ready to pay for elimination of Iranian nuclear weapons?
And why Iranian nuclear weapons are lesser acceptable for you than North Korean, Pakistani, Indian or French ones?
North Korea, Pakistan, and India have all three shown exceptable restraint with their nukes. They aren't in the streets crying death to America and Israel on a daily basis, so not only no, but hell no Iran isn't getting any nuke.
 
North Korea, Pakistan, and India have all three shown exceptable restraint with their nukes. They aren't in the streets crying death to America and Israel on a daily basis, so not only no, but hell no Iran isn't getting any nuke.
I'm almost sure that Iran will be restrained with their nukes, too.
In Russia people are singing a lot of nice songs about nuclear elimination of America, and nobody cares. I mean, actual nuclear policy and deterrence games have pretty little with public demonstrations.
 
Back
Top Bottom