The Media Is The Enemy Of The American People

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
152,356
Reaction score
93,556
Points
2,645
Location
Zzzyzzzz, California
HDN8czUWQAAbbj5.webp

The media is cheer-leading for our enemies. Their excuse is that they keep saying we're better than our enemies, so ignore everything evil that our enemy does and just focus on the United States.

This is ridiculous. War is evil. We have to accept that. But if you don't have the guts to stand up to a bully then you're doomed to be continually being beat over the head, even when you have the ability to beat that bully.

The media and the Democrat Party are the greatest threat to America. Cut & dried.

When it comes to Iran....Trump cannot win. If he bombs Iran back to the Stone Age, he's committing war crimes. If he backs off they call him a coward. This is a lie and it is by design. You cannot win when you're dealing with liars and criminals. The only way to deal with them is thru strength and courage. Something that Democrats and their lapdog media friends know nothing about.

 
"WOW: Fox's Martha MacCallum absolutely destroyed Democrat Ro Khanna over the left's new talking point that Donald Trump is a war criminal and thus no worse than Iran.

"I would ask you aware of the war crime is and whether or not you think that Iran has been guilty of war crimes killing almost 40,000 of their own people and gunning them down in the street?"
"We've all been watching president trump for a long time. Is that really what you see here or do you see this as a way to get Iran to open up the Strait, come to negotiations and hopefully to have new leadership that won't oppress its people, new leadership that will make children and women line up around energy sites which is a Geneva convention violation?

You know, I think we need to look at the history of the way that President Trump negotiates these things and to see that, you know, unless you are very clear and you have a serious, you know, stick that you are holding over this situation, you're not likely to get anywhere."

"What do we have to do? What do you recommend?"

"I've spoken with a lot of Iranian activists who want this. I think they understand what -- they want -- I think understand what -- I don't anyone's talking about [killing] 91 million people"

"What do you suggest?"
"This is a leadership that has killed 1,500 American soldiers, maimed 4,500. They have through proxy, carried off October 7, the Beirut Marine barracks bombings. At what point --- so, you really think they will suddenly decide to give these things up if they are not threatened with actual consequences?"
"It's been four weeks. It's been four weeks."
"So, don't ever stand up and -- and fight against what you just called an evil regime? What --- what do you suggest? Because we've had 47 years of weakness on this front. 47 years of weakness."
"How has [diplomacy] worked so far? How has that worked so far? How was it working?"
"I'll tell you what I believe. I believe they are already killed 1,500 of our American soldiers. They maimed 4,500. They killed 200 in a Marine barracks in Lebanon. I don't need any more evidence that they want to threaten. They also march in the streets and say death to America. What more evidence do you need?"

"I -- I can answer your question. I can easily answer your question. We know who tried to actually wipe out entire populations in World War II. We know the kind of backbone and spine that it took on the part of the United States of America to and that tyranny, but what I'm seeing is someone standing up. I am kind of surprised actually that people -- that you don't get how the language works with the President."

"But -- but you're more concerned about language than the outcome?"
"You like the language of President Biden on this, of President Obama who tried to make deals, who had negotiations and nothing changed. Nothing changed as a result and you talk to Iranian people in this country who want to to have the regime overthrown."
"And gave $30 million that went into the weapons chest of Iran. 30 billion. 30 billion, excuse me...and that worked out well, right?"
"Do you care about the 40,000 killed in the street by this regime? What does calling it out do?"
"They did all that [diplomacy] and then they killed 40,000.""We've had four weeks of this versus 47 years of what has not worked so far and I appreciate the fact that you don't like the language around it. We're going to watch actual action and see what happens -- see what the outcome is."

 
The media doesn't care if we are successful in ridding Iran of that awful regime.
 
View attachment 1241593

The media is cheer-leading for our enemies. Their excuse is that they keep saying we're better than our enemies, so ignore everything evil that our enemy does and just focus on the United States.

This is ridiculous. War is evil. We have to accept that. But if you don't have the guts to stand up to a bully then you're doomed to be continually being beat over the head, even when you have the ability to beat that bully.

The media and the Democrat Party are the greatest threat to America. Cut & dried.

When it comes to Iran....Trump cannot win. If he bombs Iran back to the Stone Age, he's committing war crimes. If he backs off they call him a coward. This is a lie and it is by design. You cannot win when you're dealing with liars and criminals. The only way to deal with them is thru strength and courage. Something that Democrats and their lapdog media friends know nothing about.


They arent worth the time of day.

They live HATE EVERYDAY. Kinda like an airplane movie scene.

 
The media doesn't care if we are successful in ridding Iran of that awful regime.
The media is working for the DNC.....so their job is to help Democrats get back into power and keep them there.

We don't have an honest media.

We have a state-run propaganda machine designed to push us into socialism.
 
Democrats and the media want Iran to win.





Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) stated, "We are losing this war" in reference to the U.S. military conflict with Iran


Murphy argued that the administration's military strategy was ineffective, saying:
  • "We cannot destroy all their missiles or drones, nor their nuclear program".

  • "Iran projects more power in the region than they did before the war".

  • The conflict was "destabilizing the world and making us look feckless"
  • . Murphy further described the operation as a "disaster of epic proportions" and argued that the U.S. was "losing American lives in a war that is... losing control".

TACO AGREED



A Cease-Fire for Now in Iran, but a Blow to American Credibility​




Critics wonder if this is America’s “Suez moment,” when a leading power signals the start of its international decline.

...But the two-week cease-fire leaves the Islamic Republic in place and still in command of the future of the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran’s nuclear stockpile and ballistic missile program unresolved. After Mr. Trump’s declaration of victory, however hollow, it is difficult to imagine a resumption of full-scale war.


For the rest of the world, the war “is starting to look like a military defeat, more serious than Iraq or Afghanistan,”
said Bruno Maçães, former secretary of state for European affairs for Portugal.


“The myth of America as all-powerful is important,” he added, “and it’s the basic requirement of a global hegemon to keep the oil flowing, to open up the strait and keep it open. This belief in an all-powerful America that can solve anything is disappearing.”




Keeping sea lanes open for American goods and global trade is one of the few permanent interests the United States has in the Middle East, as well as in Asia.


The war in Iran shut down the strait. Now, the Iranian military is still in control of the passageway and is likely to demand large tolls. “The strategic rationale for the American military presence in the region has taken a huge hit,” said Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment in Washington.




NO PAYWALL




Sorry it's NOT fake news you righties LOVE
 
15th post
View attachment 1241593

The media is cheer-leading for our enemies. Their excuse is that they keep saying we're better than our enemies, so ignore everything evil that our enemy does and just focus on the United States.

This is ridiculous. War is evil. We have to accept that. But if you don't have the guts to stand up to a bully then you're doomed to be continually being beat over the head, even when you have the ability to beat that bully.

The media and the Democrat Party are the greatest threat to America. Cut & dried.

When it comes to Iran....Trump cannot win. If he bombs Iran back to the Stone Age, he's committing war crimes. If he backs off they call him a coward. This is a lie and it is by design. You cannot win when you're dealing with liars and criminals. The only way to deal with them is thru strength and courage. Something that Democrats and their lapdog media friends know nothing about.


Here comes Red MAGA with their Stalinist language.

Go to North Korea you commies. You all are a fifth column against the American people.

The US does not need your failed ideology here.
 
Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) stated, "We are losing this war" in reference to the U.S. military conflict with Iran


Murphy argued that the administration's military strategy was ineffective, saying:
  • "We cannot destroy all their missiles or drones, nor their nuclear program".

  • "Iran projects more power in the region than they did before the war".

  • The conflict was "destabilizing the world and making us look feckless"
  • . Murphy further described the operation as a "disaster of epic proportions" and argued that the U.S. was "losing American lives in a war that is... losing control".

TACO AGREED



A Cease-Fire for Now in Iran, but a Blow to American Credibility​




Critics wonder if this is America’s “Suez moment,” when a leading power signals the start of its international decline.

...But the two-week cease-fire leaves the Islamic Republic in place and still in command of the future of the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran’s nuclear stockpile and ballistic missile program unresolved. After Mr. Trump’s declaration of victory, however hollow, it is difficult to imagine a resumption of full-scale war.


For the rest of the world, the war “is starting to look like a military defeat, more serious than Iraq or Afghanistan,”
said Bruno Maçães, former secretary of state for European affairs for Portugal.


“The myth of America as all-powerful is important,” he added, “and it’s the basic requirement of a global hegemon to keep the oil flowing, to open up the strait and keep it open. This belief in an all-powerful America that can solve anything is disappearing.”




Keeping sea lanes open for American goods and global trade is one of the few permanent interests the United States has in the Middle East, as well as in Asia.


The war in Iran shut down the strait. Now, the Iranian military is still in control of the passageway and is likely to demand large tolls. “The strategic rationale for the American military presence in the region has taken a huge hit,” said Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment in Washington.




NO PAYWALL




Sorry it's NOT fake news you righties LOVE
Bull Shit!!

 

How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran​



The decision by President Trump to give the go-ahead to join Israel in attacking Iran was influenced by a presentation by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in February that led to a series of discussions inside the White House over the following days and weeks.



...And it shows how, in the end, even the more skeptical members of Mr. Trump’s war cabinet — with the stark exception of Mr. Vance, the figure inside the White House most opposed to a full-scale war — deferred to the president’s instincts, including his abundant confidence that the war would be quick and decisive. The White House declined to comment.


...The intelligence officials had deep expertise in U.S. military capabilities, and they knew the Iranian system and its players inside out. They had broken down Mr. Netanyahu’s presentation into four parts. First was decapitation — killing the ayatollah. Second was crippling Iran’s capacity to project power and threaten its neighbors. Third was a popular uprising inside Iran. And fourth was regime change, with a secular leader installed to govern the country.





The U.S. officials assessed that the first two objectives were achievable with American intelligence and military power. They assessed that the third and fourth parts of Mr. Netanyahu’s pitch, which included the possibility of the Kurds mounting a ground invasion of Iran, were detached from reality.





...When Mr. Trump joined the meeting, Mr. Ratcliffe briefed him on the assessment. The C.I.A. director used one word to describe the Israeli prime minister’s regime change scenarios: “farcical.”



At that point, Mr. Rubio cut in. “In other words, it’s bullshit,” he said.





NO PAYWALL




DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS AND MEDIA, BOTH ENEMIES OF THE STATE :laughing0301:
 
Back
Top Bottom