The Media Is The Enemy Of The American People

[JonKoch]

Bull Shit!!

LMAOROG. Ok that proves what?

 

[mudwhistle]

Classic illustration of the Democrat platform:

“Democrats have no in-between —
there is no happy medium because there is no happy anything!” — Trace Gallagher​

 

[mudwhistle]

LMAOROG. Ok that proves what?

That you're full of crap.

Next stupid question.

 

[JonKoch]

Classic illustration of the Democrat platform:

“Democrats have no in-between —
there is no happy medium because there is no happy anything!” — Trace Gallagher​

Without FALSE premises, distortions or lies, what would the right EVER have?

 

[mudwhistle]

Megyn Kelly reveals her true self to us again:

 

[mudwhistle]

Without FALSE premises, distortions or lies, what would the right EVER have?

The truth. All the left has is lies.

 

[eagle1462010]

Megyn Kelly reveals her true self to us again:

Wow. She is a military strategist to boot.

Will she kiss Mullahs asses for her TDS

 

[EdwinAMartin]

lol Megyn Kelly didn't even know about the French at Yorktown, much less most American history. She proved that during the first televised Debates in Trump's first election campaign, where she tried to look clever and play a Gotcha Moment and just embarrassed herself.

 

[JonKoch]

lol Megyn Kelly didn't even know about the French at Yorktown, much less most American history. She proved that during the first televised Debates in Trump's first election campaign, where she tried to look clever and play a Gotcha Moment and just embarrassed herself.

Yep, She's an idiot​

​

​

Megyn Kelly: I’d still back Trump even if he dropped a nuke — Dems are worse!​

 

[mudwhistle]

lol Megyn Kelly didn't even know about the French at Yorktown, much less most American history. She proved that during the first televised Debates in Trump's first election campaign, where she tried to look clever and play a Gotcha Moment and just embarrassed herself.

The two faces of Megyn Kelly:

 

[HikerGuy83]

The media is cheer-leading for our enemies.

This is news?

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT) stated, "We are losing this war" in reference to the U.S. military conflict with Iran


Murphy argued that the administration's military strategy was ineffective, saying:

• "We cannot destroy all their missiles or drones, nor their nuclear program".

• "Iran projects more power in the region than they did before the war".

• The conflict was "destabilizing the world and making us look feckless"
• . Murphy further described the operation as a "disaster of epic proportions" and argued that the U.S. was "losing American lives in a war that is... losing control".

TACO AGREED

A Cease-Fire for Now in Iran, but a Blow to American Credibility​

Critics wonder if this is America’s “Suez moment,” when a leading power signals the start of its international decline.

...But the two-week cease-fire leaves the Islamic Republic in place and still in command of the future of the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran’s nuclear stockpile and ballistic missile program unresolved. After Mr. Trump’s declaration of victory, however hollow, it is difficult to imagine a resumption of full-scale war.


For the rest of the world, the war “is starting to look like a military defeat, more serious than Iraq or Afghanistan,” said Bruno Maçães, former secretary of state for European affairs for Portugal.


“The myth of America as all-powerful is important,” he added, “and it’s the basic requirement of a global hegemon to keep the oil flowing, to open up the strait and keep it open. This belief in an all-powerful America that can solve anything is disappearing.”




Keeping sea lanes open for American goods and global trade is one of the few permanent interests the United States has in the Middle East, as well as in Asia.


The war in Iran shut down the strait. Now, the Iranian military is still in control of the passageway and is likely to demand large tolls. “The strategic rationale for the American military presence in the region has taken a huge hit,” said Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment in Washington.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/09/world/europe/iran-war-suez.html

NO PAYWALL

https://archive.ph/6YOG7

Sorry it's NOT fake news you righties LOVE

Quoting the NYSlimes isn't a convincing argument.

 

[Darkwind]

How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran​

The decision by President Trump to give the go-ahead to join Israel in attacking Iran was influenced by a presentation by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in February that led to a series of discussions inside the White House over the following days and weeks.



...And it shows how, in the end, even the more skeptical members of Mr. Trump’s war cabinet — with the stark exception of Mr. Vance, the figure inside the White House most opposed to a full-scale war — deferred to the president’s instincts, including his abundant confidence that the war would be quick and decisive. The White House declined to comment.


...The intelligence officials had deep expertise in U.S. military capabilities, and they knew the Iranian system and its players inside out. They had broken down Mr. Netanyahu’s presentation into four parts. First was decapitation — killing the ayatollah. Second was crippling Iran’s capacity to project power and threaten its neighbors. Third was a popular uprising inside Iran. And fourth was regime change, with a secular leader installed to govern the country.





The U.S. officials assessed that the first two objectives were achievable with American intelligence and military power. They assessed that the third and fourth parts of Mr. Netanyahu’s pitch, which included the possibility of the Kurds mounting a ground invasion of Iran, were detached from reality.





...When Mr. Trump joined the meeting, Mr. Ratcliffe briefed him on the assessment. The C.I.A. director used one word to describe the Israeli prime minister’s regime change scenarios: “farcical.”



At that point, Mr. Rubio cut in. “In other words, it’s bullshit,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/07/us/politics/trump-iran-war.html

NO PAYWALL

https://archive.ph/eJKLa

DAMN THOSE DEMOCRATS AND MEDIA, BOTH ENEMIES OF THE STATE

No paywall, but no truth either.

This was a great piece of fiction.

 

[jackflash]

View attachment 1241593

The media is cheer-leading for our enemies. Their excuse is that they keep saying we're better than our enemies, so ignore everything evil that our enemy does and just focus on the United States.

This is ridiculous. War is evil. We have to accept that. But if you don't have the guts to stand up to a bully then you're doomed to be continually being beat over the head, even when you have the ability to beat that bully.

The media and the Democrat Party are the greatest threat to America. Cut & dried.

When it comes to Iran....Trump cannot win. If he bombs Iran back to the Stone Age, he's committing war crimes. If he backs off they call him a coward. This is a lie and it is by design. You cannot win when you're dealing with liars and criminals. The only way to deal with them is thru strength and courage. Something that Democrats and their lapdog media friends know nothing about.

The lefties ploy of your "damned if ya don't", "damned if ya do", is old hat. Unfortunately for the lefties their worn out political tactics are well known by everyone so those tactics no longer work for the left as a "Vote Getter." Americans can think for themselves which MANY do by rationalizing left wing tactics, then followed up by avoiding the "televised" lefty controlled & tainted news sources. That's WHY the "online independent" citizen journalists have become so successful.

Below; no BS, no propaganda just the FACTS.

 

[Ringo]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

 

[mudwhistle]

Speaking of war crimes.......

When Iran started using civilians as human-shields they committed war crimes. So the bellyaching by Democrats and the media is totally biased:

Article 51 Paragraph 7 Geneva Convention



1986 This provision affords measures of protection to the whole of the civilian population and all civilians, thus extending to them measures which already exist for two categories of persons: prisoners of war and civilians protected by the fourth Convention. In fact, according to Article 23 of the Third Convention, prisoners of war may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations.



1987 As regards persons protected by the fourth Convention, Article 28 of the latter provides that they may not be used to render certain points or areas immune from military operations. Article 19 of the first Convention and Article 12 of the present Protocol ' (Protection of medical units) ' contain a similar rule with regard to medical units. For its part, Article 58 of the Protocol ' (Precautions against the effects of attack) ' also deals with measures to be taken to remove the population from the vicinity of military objectives, and we refer the reader to the commentary thereon.



1988 This paragraph develops and clarifies these various rules. The term "movements" in particular is a new one; this is intended to cover cases where the civilian population moves of its own accord. The second sentence concerns cases where the movement of the population takes place in accordance with instructions from the competent authorities, and is particularly concerned with movements ordered by an Occupying Power, although it certainly also applies to transfers of prisoners of war, and civilian enemy subjects ordered by the authorities of a belligerent Power to move within its own territory.

https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/en/ihl-treaties/api-1977/article-51/commentary/1987

 

[mudwhistle]