The Long-Awaited, Long-Obstructed Discharge Petition Has Just Passed

Oh! Guilt by association, you say!

Okay, then!

trump-maxwell-epstein-melania.jpg


trump-epstein.jpg


There are many more. After all, they were best friends.

Take a close look at this video. I'm sure you've seen it before. Jeffy and Donny yucking it up and Trump making a creepy face.

But did you ever notice the woman right behind them? I marked the video at the point she shows her face to the camera for about 15 seconds:









.

Thick as thieves.




.

Those photos look like the early eighties; long before there was any suspicion of illegal actions by Epstein . Trump was the first person to turn on Epstein.
 
Those photos look like the early eighties; long before there was any suspicion of illegal actions by Epstein . Trump was the first person to turn on Epstein.
You forget. Epstein called Trump "the dog that would not bark."

Meaning Trump knew.

They split up over a real estate deal where Epstein bested him.

As we all know all too well, Trump is the world's worst sore loser.

.
 
Those photos look like the early eighties; long before there was any suspicion of illegal actions by Epstein .
Well, they aren't. Unless you think Trump dated Melania in the early 80s. Look again.

Trump met Melania in 1998, at the peak of Epstein's crime spree. The year he bought his island.
 
You forget. Epstein called Trump "the dog that would not bark."

Meaning Trump knew.

They split up over a real estate deal where Epstein bested him.

As we all know all too well, Trump is the world's worst sore loser.

.
I think Epstein was mangling an old reference to something that is absent (or unsaid) being the most important thing of all. 'Trump's name being so far unstated to the authorities or lawyers by himself or Maxwell' was 'the dog that hasn't barked'.

The dog didn't bark, so the detective surmised that the dog knew the killer, with the absence of the bark being the key piece of evidence that turned the case.

It's a plot device. Epstein kind of mangled it, but his point came through.
 
Last edited:
I think Epstein was mangling an old reference to something being unsaid being the most important thing of all. Trump's name being so far unstated to the authorities or lawyers by him or Maxwell was his point.
"The dog that won't bark" is an expression which means someone who knows of something bad going on, but says nothing.

In legal terms, "silence implies consent".

Epstein is saying Trump knew he was diddling little girls.
 
"The dog that won't bark" is an expression which means someone who knows of something bad going on, but says nothing.

In legal terms, "silence implies consent".

Epstein is saying Trump knew he was diddling little girls.
I get that, but in the context of the email, I think he meant himself and Maxwell to be the dogs who had not yet barked.

"Police Chief, etc.... I'm 75% there"

75% of the way there to.... what?

I admit, I'm confused about it.
 
I think Epstein was mangling an old reference to something that is absent (or unsaid) being the most important thing of all. 'Trump's name being so far unstated to the authorities or lawyers by himself or Maxwell' was 'the dog that hasn't barked'.

The dog didn't bark, so the detective surmised that the dog knew the killer, with the absence of the bark being the key piece of evidence that turned the case.

It's a plot device. Epstein kind of mangled it, but his point came through.
Thanks for the explanation, I was wondering what that reference meant.
 
Even if it passes, it has no authority if Trump refuses to sign it. I highly doubt it will pass by a super majority that can override a veto
 
I made an error earlier.

After the Houses passes the Epstein Files Transparency Act, the bill then goes to the Senate.

In September, Chuck Schumer attempted to force a vote on the bill.

The Republicans put forth a motion to table the bill.

Two Republicans joined the Democrats to vote against the motion, but they weren't enough.

The motion passed 51-49.

That vote was below the radar of the American people.

The next one won't be.

What would be amusing if the next vote is 50-50 and JD Vance has to cast the deciding vote, thus destroying his 2028 chances.



.
Your hallucinations are getting worse ...

i-vprWwxf-L.jpg
 
You forget. Epstein called Trump "the dog that would not bark."

Meaning Trump knew.

They split up over a real estate deal where Epstein bested him.

As we all know all too well, Trump is the world's worst sore loser.

.
I have no idea if Trump was involved with Epstein or to what degree.
I do know this:
Many Democrats were.
And let's assume for just one second that for once in your life, you're actually right instead of embarrassingly wrong as you usually are.
Guess what?







Say hello to President JD Vance! 👋 :smile:

i-dGgtHpP.jpg


"Hi, asshole!"
 
I can't wait to see Trump's "Truth" Social post in response to this.

Mikey Johnson did all he could to aid and abet Trump's hiding of the PedoFiles, but in the end, he failed.

I can only imagine the strongarming which took place today to try to get the Republicans in favor of the petition to reverse their support. Good on them for not caving. There's hope for America, after all.

This now means the Epstein Files Transparency Act will be brought to a vote in early December, providing Trump with a really awesome Christmas present. :lol:

Once the Epstein Files Transparency Act passes, Trump's FBI will be compelled to release the Kraken PedoFiles.

Isn't there going to be a vote on the bill next week? Plenty of time for trump to coerce some R's to vote against it. But those emails are going to make doing so much more politically dangerous.
 
Isn't there going to be a vote on the bill next week? Plenty of time for trump to coerce some R's to vote against it. But those emails are going to make doing so much more politically dangerous.
"Those emails".
You clowns are hilarious. You're putting every hope and dream into this, hoping and hoping and hoping that Trump will go down.

i-LFKD6vV-M.jpg
 
I have no idea if Trump was involved with Epstein or to what degree.
How is that possible? Have you turned your head away every time they show a video of them together, or hear trump talk about what a great guy Epstein was, or show the card Don wrote to him about sharing a secret, or all the other evidence showing they had a close relationship?
 
How is that possible? Have you turned your head away every time they show a video of them together, or hear trump talk about what a great guy Epstein was, or show the card Don wrote to him about sharing a secret, or all the other evidence showing they had a close relationship?
Thirty years ago?
Who cares?
I don't.
 
I can't wait to see Trump's "Truth" Social post in response to this.

Mikey Johnson did all he could to aid and abet Trump's hiding of the PedoFiles, but in the end, he failed.

I can only imagine the strongarming which took place today to try to get the Republicans in favor of the petition to reverse their support. Good on them for not caving. There's hope for America, after all.

This now means the Epstein Files Transparency Act will be brought to a vote in early December, providing Trump with a really awesome Christmas present. :lol:

Once the Epstein Files Transparency Act passes, Trump's FBI will be compelled to release the Kraken PedoFiles.


And why did the dems just block it? Cant wait for your response. Dont get yourself all tangled up.

 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom