The Liberal Rape Myth

And yet you deny the fact that most rapes are never reported.

You have a link to that?

Posted plenty already to which the OP's author never responded for some strange reason. You're a little late to the party......review the thread and come back when you're up to speed.

Okay then, I think I am up to speed. This is what I saw from you, all of your posts since the start of this thread:


Post 072 - no links to relevant information - ad hominem
Post 137 - no links to relevant information - ad hominem
Post 146 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion
Post 155 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion
Post 157 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion
Post 163 - no links to relevant information - Tu quoque assertion
Post 165 - no links to relevant information - ad hominem
Post 169 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion
Post 171 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion
Post 177 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, engages in ad hominem
Post 179 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, engages in ad hominem
Post 182 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, ad hominem, dismisses factual assertion by respondent

Post 185 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, engages in ad hominem
Post 192 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, employs argumentum ad baculum
Post 198 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, engages in ad hominem
Post 200 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem
Post 224 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem

TemplarKormac enters discussion at Post 226 - calls Disco on assertion post 192 and posts a link which also cites quote from link

Post 239 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion - engages in ad hominem, doesn't attempt rebuttal to post 226

Post 241 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem
Post 242 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in off topic trolling
Post 244 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in off topic trolling

Post 245 - posts link to relevant information - fails to recognize the age of link (circa 1996, 18 years), and link does not cite relevant statistical information

Post 273 - posts link to relevant information - fails to acknowledge within link that through the 1990's, reporting rates began to increase due to a substantial ad/social campaigns, and legal reforms; fails to acknowledge that the resolution of the study is between 1992 and 2000. Fails to cite that "Only 36 percent of rapes, 34 percent of attempted rapes, and 26 percent of sexual assaults were reported." Link does not account for 14 year period between 2000 and 2014.

Post 275 - no links to relevant information - vaguely substantiated assertion made - engages in ad hominem, ad baculum

Post 280 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in off topic trolling
Post 282 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem
Post 308 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in off topic trolling
Post 310 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in argumentum ad baculum
Post 311 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem
Post 313 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem
Post 314 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in ad hominem

Post 319 - OP posts link to relevant DOJ study. Sites statistical information.

Post 329 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in genetic form of ad hominem, doesn't attempt rebuttal to post 319

Post 330 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion
Post 332 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion - doesn't attempt rebuttal to Post 319
Post 333 - no links to relevant information - engages in off topic trolling - doesn't attempt rebuttal to Post 319
Post 336 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in tu quoque argument, doesn't attempt rebuttal to Post 319

Post 337 - TemplarKormac posts relevant statistical information, link and chart regarding reporting rates for time period covering 1995 - 2013.

Poster Discombobulated has yet to reply to post 337 for 1 hour 19 minutes 40 seconds.

END

So, you posted two links, very poor links. But for 94.5% of the 36 posts you made on this thread, you failed to post any meaningful information, except for a lot of braying and crying.

So then you did find links didn't you. You just didn't like what they said.

Actually I spent the past 2 hours reading them. They were trumped by the DOJ study that you have yet to acknowledge. You are dishonest. I'll document each and every post you make that you do not address the information posted in post 319

Post 339 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made, doesn't attempt to rebut post 319
 
I can't believe this idiot is timing me. I guess he sits around monitoring this forum 24/7.

You asked me to get up to speed. So that's what I did. If only you were as thorough... oh, and just so you know, you're still responding to me at 3:00 AM EST. Lets dispense with the hypocrisy please.

Post 340 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made, engages in ad hominem, doesn't attempt rebuttal of post 319
 
And here's a question for you dummy: How do you cite precise statistics on unreported crimes?

I believe post 319 did that. But you care not to read it. If I recall it's simple addition and subtraction.

Post 343 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, doesn't attempt to rebut post 319
 
And here's a question for you dummy: How do you cite precise statistics on unreported crimes?

I believe post 319 did that. But you care not to read it. If I recall it's simple addition and subtraction.

Post 343 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, doesn't attempt to rebut post 319

I take your dismissals as absolute confirmation.
 

Really? You just cited an infographic from a charity organization. Patently dishonest.

Post 344 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, engages in ad hominem
Post 345 - posts a link to a anti sexual assault charity organization's citation of rape statistics, unreliable source
Post 347 - posts a link to a BJS study covering a four year period between 2006-2010, conducted prior to this one, covering 1995-2013.
Post 348 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - employs a false dichotomy
 

Really? You just cited an infographic from a charity organization. Patently dishonest.

Post 344 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion, engages in ad hominem
Post 345 - posts a link to a anti sexual assault charity organization's citation of rape statistics, unreliable source
Post 347 - posts a link to a BJS study covering a four year period between 2006-2010, conducted prior to this one, covering 1995-2013.
Post 348 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - employs a false dichotomy

Your perception is skewed with obvious bias in favor of rapists.
 
15th post
Lets see what this woman has to say about rape.

50 Actual Facts About Rape Soraya Chemaly

Post 349 - posts link to an opinion piece from a leftist blogger on Huffington Post, whose citation of rape statistics include Think Progress, and internal citations within main website.

Post 350 - reposts link to the 2006 - 2010 NCVS study, cited though Huffington Post

Post 351 - Cites a link from a Rape treatment center which cites no rape statistics past the year 2000, goes as far back as 1992.

Post 353 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - engages in genetic form of ad hominem, off topic trolling

Post 355 - no links to relevant information - unsubstantiated assertion - makes accusations of bias, engages in ad hominem


Your perception is skewed with obvious bias in favor of rapists.

And this is how you lost the argument. I am an avid speed reader. I went through each of the links you just posted, you know what I found? Your perception is biased in favor of politicizing and perpetuating a non existent rape culture within the college domain. Give it a rest.

Oh, and this link:

http://ojp.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/2012/ojppr080912.pdf

Covers ALL violent crimes in 2012, 3.4 million of which went unreported. So, how does this one prove your point? What portion of those violent crimes were rapes?

Didn't think so.

Post 357 - posts link to a 2012 study by the Center for Disease Control. Fails to realize that CDC is not a valid source of rape statistics, as they only prevent diseases, not instances of rape. Report simply recites studies done by the Department of Justice.

Post 358 - no links to relevant information - no assertion made - ignores posts form TemplarKormac containing relevant sources (I.E. The DOJ and BJS) and information.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom