The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[danielpalos]

your bigotry is showing. nobody takes the right wing seriously about the law, Constitutional or otherwise.

I’m a “bigot” for pointing out the fact that you don’t know basic words?!?

no. you are a bigot because you believe you are right merely Because you are on the Right Wing but, have an inferior knowledge of words at your disposal.

You’re the dillhole misusing every basic word. You just did it again with “bigot”

why should i believe a bigot with inferior word knowledge and comprehension?

Hmmm, good question. Why SHOULD we believe you?

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

 

[hadit]

I’m a “bigot” for pointing out the fact that you don’t know basic words?!?

no. you are a bigot because you believe you are right merely Because you are on the Right Wing but, have an inferior knowledge of words at your disposal.

You’re the dillhole misusing every basic word. You just did it again with “bigot”

why should i believe a bigot with inferior word knowledge and comprehension?

Hmmm, good question. Why SHOULD we believe you?

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

 

[danielpalos]

no. you are a bigot because you believe you are right merely Because you are on the Right Wing but, have an inferior knowledge of words at your disposal.

You’re the dillhole misusing every basic word. You just did it again with “bigot”

why should i believe a bigot with inferior word knowledge and comprehension?

Hmmm, good question. Why SHOULD we believe you?

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

 

[hadit]

You’re the dillhole misusing every basic word. You just did it again with “bigot”

why should i believe a bigot with inferior word knowledge and comprehension?

Hmmm, good question. Why SHOULD we believe you?

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

 

[danielpalos]

why should i believe a bigot with inferior word knowledge and comprehension?

Hmmm, good question. Why SHOULD we believe you?

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

 

[hadit]

Hmmm, good question. Why SHOULD we believe you?

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You just did it again.

 

[danielpalos]

simply Because, You lose all Your arguments.

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You just did it again.

maybe you are just too dumb to get it. are you on the right wing? the right wing, never gets it.

 

[hadit]

You're not facing reality. Arguing with you really is like playing chess with a pigeon. You stumble all over the board, knock over all the pieces, then insist you won the game. Well, you didn't.

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You just did it again.

maybe you are just too dumb to get it. are you on the right wing? the right wing, never gets it.

There's nothing to get from you.

 

[danielpalos]

bigots are like women; they can gossip about anything.

Men have arguments.

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You just did it again.

maybe you are just too dumb to get it. are you on the right wing? the right wing, never gets it.

There's nothing to get from you.

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

 

[hadit]

You don't. You just make random statements that don't mean anything, them claim you won an argument.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You just did it again.

maybe you are just too dumb to get it. are you on the right wing? the right wing, never gets it.

There's nothing to get from you.

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You, however, do not.

 

[danielpalos]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You just did it again.

maybe you are just too dumb to get it. are you on the right wing? the right wing, never gets it.

There's nothing to get from you.

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You, however, do not.

i gainsay your contention;

want to argue about it?

 

[hadit]

You just did it again.

maybe you are just too dumb to get it. are you on the right wing? the right wing, never gets it.

There's nothing to get from you.

anybody can gossip. Men have arguments.

You, however, do not.

i gainsay your contention;

want to argue about it?

Don't have to. I've proven you wrong over and over again and you still keep popping up with the same failed blargle over and over again. You lost a long time ago, but you keep claiming you won even as the dust settles from my victory parade.

 

[danielpalos]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

blah blah blah.....yada yada yada.....

FACT....
talk is cheap.

If no one is willing to actually DO ANYTHING about it, you're just hens squawking in the barn

70 years of horrifying human torture and abuse have occurred since
north Koreas Kim Il-sung seized power in 1948. Billions of North Koreans have suffered because when the time to act was upon them, all they did was blah blah blah.....

Freedom was never free. Not even in the USA. Sheeple have let their guard down expecting it to continue to be handed to them on a silver platter....free of charge.

That's the single most important takeaway from this thread. All that's required for evil men to prevail is for good men to do nothing. You've been warned (many times now)

 

[P@triot]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You have declared many dozens of times right here on USMB that the “General Welfare” clause grants the federal government unlimited power so long as they deem their actions to be “in the general welfare”. Well snowflake, our elected leaders have decided that it is most definitely in the general welfare to build a wall, engage in general warfare, and go on the common offense.

You can’t have it both ways, ignorant little fragile snowflake. You can’t insist that the general welfare clause grants broad, unlimited powers and then simultaneously declare that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant the actions you whine about.

 

[P@triot]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

We’ve been over this, snowflake. Dozens of times now. You have declared many, many times right here on USMB that the “General Welfare” clause grants the federal government unlimited power so long as they deem their actions to be “in the general welfare”. Well snowflake, our elected leaders have decided that it is most definitely in the general welfare to build a wall, engage in general warfare, and go on the common offense.

You can’t have it both ways, ignorant little fragile snowflake. You can’t insist that the general welfare clause grants broad, unlimited powers and then simultaneously declare that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant the actions you whine about.

 

[P@triot]

All that's required for evil men to prevail is for good men to do nothing.

So what have you done? I don’t recall you putting a bullet in Barack Obama’s head.

 

[P@triot]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You have declared many dozens of times right here on USMB that the “General Welfare” clause grants the federal government unlimited power so long as they deem their actions to be “in the general welfare”. Well snowflake, our elected leaders have decided that it is most definitely in the general welfare to build a wall, engage in general warfare, and go on the common offense.

You can’t have it both ways, ignorant little fragile snowflake. You can’t insist that the general welfare clause grants broad, unlimited powers and then simultaneously declare that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant the actions you whine about.

 

[danielpalos]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You have declared many dozens of times right here on USMB that the “General Welfare” clause grants the federal government unlimited power so long as they deem their actions to be “in the general welfare”. Well snowflake, our elected leaders have decided that it is most definitely in the general welfare to build a wall, engage in general warfare, and go on the common offense.

You can’t have it both ways, ignorant little fragile snowflake. You can’t insist that the general welfare clause grants broad, unlimited powers and then simultaneously declare that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant the actions you whine about.

we have to quibble for due diligence purposes.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause or a general defense clause.

why resort to implied powers when express powers cover all contingencies.

 

[hadit]

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause.

You have declared many dozens of times right here on USMB that the “General Welfare” clause grants the federal government unlimited power so long as they deem their actions to be “in the general welfare”. Well snowflake, our elected leaders have decided that it is most definitely in the general welfare to build a wall, engage in general warfare, and go on the common offense.

You can’t have it both ways, ignorant little fragile snowflake. You can’t insist that the general welfare clause grants broad, unlimited powers and then simultaneously declare that the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant the actions you whine about.

we have to quibble for due diligence purposes.

We have a general welfare clause not a general warfare clause or a general defense clause.

why resort to implied powers when express powers cover all contingencies.

Because they don't.