The liberal march towards EXTREME fascism

[danielpalos]

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror are nothing but socialism on a national basis.

Again...snowflake...enforcing the law is not “socialism”. You still can’t grasp the difference between political systems and economic systems.

you don't know what you are talking about.

According to some, merely using the Other Peoples' money is socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror are nothing but socialism on a national basis.

Enforcing the law isn’t “socialism”.

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

I repeat this undeniable, indisputable fact: enforcing the law isn’t “socialism”.

This is the actual and express law: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization

There is no express power for alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

Cite the express law that establishes a uniform rule of naturalization.

That is the delegated power. It does not say build walls for naturalization.

 

[P@triot]

Captialism had such a hard time under nazism

capitalism went from negative returns to +15.
Long story short: capital was doing better under the Nazis than under FDR.

Longer story shorter: economies ALWAYS do better during war time.

There was almost 0 "capitalism" under Adolf Hitler. Nearly everything was produced under the direction to the state. He kept the war machine going at the highest level ever seen by man, so obviously their depression turned around with the need for guns, bullets, tanks, bombs, uniforms, boots, vehicles, etc.

 

[hadit]

There is no express power for alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

So you would naturally agree then that the F.B.I. is completely unconstitutional?

no. it is a federal department.

The Actual powers delegated are to provide for the common defense and general welfare.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare over the general welfare at Any given opportunity.

The FBI doesn't have anything to do with defense. But we knew that.

 

[P@triot]

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror are nothing but socialism on a national basis.

Again...snowflake...enforcing the law is not “socialism”. You still can’t grasp the difference between political systems and economic systems.

you don't know what you are talking about.

Sure I do! That's why I'm running circles around you right now. Enforcing the law has NOTHING to do with economics. It is neither capitalism, nor socialism, nor communism, nor anything else related to economics.

 

[P@triot]

There is no express power for alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

So you would naturally agree then that the F.B.I. is completely unconstitutional?

no. it is a federal department.

The Actual powers delegated are to provide for the common defense and general welfare.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare over the general welfare at Any given opportunity.

You just said that there is (and I quote) "no express power for alleged war on crimes, drugs, and terror". Well, that's exactly what the F.B.I. does. Now you turn around and say that the F.B.I. is constitutional because "it is a federal department" and because it has powers "to provide for the common defense and general welfare".

See, if there is "no express power for alleged war on crimes, drugs, and terror", then the F.B.I. cannot exist because that is ALL they do. However, if "powers" exist (as you idiotically claim) for "common defense and general welfare", then the F.B.I. can exist and has EVERY right and EVERY power to "wage wars on crime, drugs, and terror".

So now I've just caught you talking about of BOTH sides of your mouth. Proving that A.) you truly are an imbecile and B.) you have no idea what you're talking about.

hadit - I invite you to come enjoy this post that just ended Daniels run on USMB.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no express power for alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

So you would naturally agree then that the F.B.I. is completely unconstitutional?

no. it is a federal department.

The Actual powers delegated are to provide for the common defense and general welfare.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare over the general welfare at Any given opportunity.

The FBI doesn't have anything to do with defense. But we knew that.

The executive department is in charge of faithful execution of federal laws.

 

[danielpalos]

Our alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror are nothing but socialism on a national basis.

Again...snowflake...enforcing the law is not “socialism”. You still can’t grasp the difference between political systems and economic systems.

you don't know what you are talking about.

Sure I do! That's why I'm running circles around you right now. Enforcing the law has NOTHING to do with economics. It is neither capitalism, nor socialism, nor communism, nor anything else related to economics.

socialism is the Power to do something via Government. capitalism is about voluntary social transactions that result in mutually beneficial trade.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no express power for alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

So you would naturally agree then that the F.B.I. is completely unconstitutional?

no. it is a federal department.

The Actual powers delegated are to provide for the common defense and general welfare.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare over the general welfare at Any given opportunity.

You just said that there is (and I quote) "no express power for alleged war on crimes, drugs, and terror". Well, that's exactly what the F.B.I. does. Now you turn around and say that the F.B.I. is constitutional because "it is a federal department" and because it has powers "to provide for the common defense and general welfare".

See, if there is "no express power for alleged war on crimes, drugs, and terror", then the F.B.I. cannot exist because that is ALL they do. However, if "powers" exist (as you idiotically claim) for "common defense and general welfare", then the F.B.I. can exist and has EVERY right and EVERY power to "wage wars on crime, drugs, and terror".

So now I've just caught you talking about of BOTH sides of your mouth. Proving that A.) you truly are an imbecile and B.) you have no idea what you're talking about.

hadit - I invite you to come enjoy this post that just ended Daniels run on USMB.

A department must follow directions. Investigating federal crimes may require a federal bureau of investigation.

 

[dudmuck]

Captialism had such a hard time under nazism

capitalism went from negative returns to +15.
Long story short: capital was doing better under the Nazis than under FDR.

Longer story shorter: economies ALWAYS do better during war time.

There was almost 0 "capitalism" under Adolf Hitler. Nearly everything was produced under the direction to the state. He kept the war machine going at the highest level ever seen by man, so obviously their depression turned around with the need for guns, bullets, tanks, bombs, uniforms, boots, vehicles, etc.

What is your source of information?
This is my source:
“Against the Mainstream: Nazi Privatization in the 1930s,” from the Economic History Review. From the abstract:

In the mid-1930s, the Nazi regime transferred public ownership to the private sector. In doing so, they went against the mainstream trends in western capitalistic countries, none of which systematically reprivatized firms during the 1930s.

 

[hadit]

There is no express power for alleged wars on crime, drugs, and terror.

So you would naturally agree then that the F.B.I. is completely unconstitutional?

no. it is a federal department.

The Actual powers delegated are to provide for the common defense and general welfare.

There is no authority to promote the general warfare over the general welfare at Any given opportunity.

You just said that there is (and I quote) "no express power for alleged war on crimes, drugs, and terror". Well, that's exactly what the F.B.I. does. Now you turn around and say that the F.B.I. is constitutional because "it is a federal department" and because it has powers "to provide for the common defense and general welfare".

See, if there is "no express power for alleged war on crimes, drugs, and terror", then the F.B.I. cannot exist because that is ALL they do. However, if "powers" exist (as you idiotically claim) for "common defense and general welfare", then the F.B.I. can exist and has EVERY right and EVERY power to "wage wars on crime, drugs, and terror".

So now I've just caught you talking about of BOTH sides of your mouth. Proving that A.) you truly are an imbecile and B.) you have no idea what you're talking about.

hadit - I invite you to come enjoy this post that just ended Daniels run on USMB.

The villagers are rejoicing. The sad thing is, I don't think he realizes it.

 

[P@triot]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

 

[P@triot]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

I can’t tell if you’re too lazy to look up a basic definition or too inept.

 

[P@triot]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

Every government in the history of the world has had the “power” to do “something”. That means there has never been a society other than socialism according to you.

 

[danielpalos]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

I can’t tell if you’re too lazy to look up a basic definition or too inept.

View attachment 235091

Government is socialism.

 

[danielpalos]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

Every government in the history of the world has had the “power” to do “something”. That means there has never been a society other than socialism according to you.

social-ism, is a Requirement for Government.

 

[hadit]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

Every government in the history of the world has had the “power” to do “something”. That means there has never been a society other than socialism according to you.

social-ism, is a Requirement for Government.

No wonder you never think you lose an argument. You just redefine words to mean what you want as you go.

 

[danielpalos]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

Every government in the history of the world has had the “power” to do “something”. That means there has never been a society other than socialism according to you.

social-ism, is a Requirement for Government.

No wonder you never think you lose an argument. You just redefine words to mean what you want as you go.

No wonder, i actually understand the concepts.

 

[anynameyouwish]

The right wing blames anyone but themselves. They would prefer to mine the border yet it is Liberals who are marching toward extremism.

There is nothing “extreme” or “fascist” about upholding the U.S. Constitution. With each post, your comments are getting more desperate.

"There is nothing “extreme” or “fascist” about upholding the U.S. Constitution. With each post, your comments are getting more desperate."

I don't see conservatives "upholding the U.S. Constitution" for ALL Americans. Only for white conservative christians. Which isn't upholding it at all! It is perverting it.

 

[hadit]

socialism is the Power to do something via Government.

Every government in the history of the world has had the “power” to do “something”. That means there has never been a society other than socialism according to you.

social-ism, is a Requirement for Government.

No wonder you never think you lose an argument. You just redefine words to mean what you want as you go.

No wonder, i actually understand the concepts.

Then write like you do. Simply defining words to mean something completely different does not mean you understand the concept, it means you don't.