The Left wants Government 2 take everybody's $ and re-distribute it; says that's not trickle-down

[bedowin62]

Obama says wages are growing. They're not - Jan. 21, 2015
money.cnn.com/2015/.../obama-state-of-the-union-wages-fla...

• Cached
• Similar

CNNMoney
Loading...
Jan 21, 2015 - In his State of the Union Speech, President Obama said wages are growing. ... (1) As wages fall below the level necessary to provide for a home and a family any reason to .... Terms under which this service is provided to you.

 

[Preacher]

Waaaaaaaaaa its all Obama's fault Waaaaaaaaaaa...Bush NEVER did any wrong! waaaaaaaa....trickle down started with our god Reagan but he never did any wrong! WAAAAAAAAA

 

[ScienceRocks]

Its simple sparky. The government must "redistribute" what is already ours. Our labor was stolen by an asshole in a thousand dollar suit with a company behind him and if it wasn't for that fact and the fact most people are morons and don't realize in numbers we have power we would have taken our money we are duly owed already. So again. Government is simply getting for us what is rightfully ours and when companies learn they can't STEAL our labor without paying us a rightful wage then the government won't be needed to do so any longer.

you poor sad idiot

you trust the government with your money
IN THE HISTORY OF CIVILIZATION who has screwed over the people more, businesses or government???

Government is only as useful as we make it. Its useful in this instance to get our money that was robbed from us by taking our labor and not giving us a legit wage.

As it is. Companies TAKE our labor redistribute our labor to get their crap made for them and don't pay us a legit wage. So government must correct that.

what is this "legit wage" you keep ranting about leftard????

Living wage. A wage I can pay all bills,mortgage,gas in car etc with without being broke or needing to pawn a title or go to a payday loan place. A wage I can live comfortably on. Of course that's going to be different across the country so it would have to be made to fit the city/area.

oh boy; where do i even start???

We know, you want the top 1% to have it all like some central American or African shit hole.

we are closer than ever to an African or central American shithole under obama/progressives

thanks for playing though

Funny, unions and government regulations built the middle class during the early 20th century. WTF are you talking about??? The rich taking it all is why those places suck.

 

[bedowin62]

you poor sad idiot

you trust the government with your money
IN THE HISTORY OF CIVILIZATION who has screwed over the people more, businesses or government???

Government is only as useful as we make it. Its useful in this instance to get our money that was robbed from us by taking our labor and not giving us a legit wage.

what is this "legit wage" you keep ranting about leftard????

Living wage. A wage I can pay all bills,mortgage,gas in car etc with without being broke or needing to pawn a title or go to a payday loan place. A wage I can live comfortably on. Of course that's going to be different across the country so it would have to be made to fit the city/area.

oh boy; where do i even start???

We know, you want the top 1% to have it all like some central American or African shit hole.

we are closer than ever to an African or central American shithole under obama/progressives

thanks for playing though

Funny, unions and government regulations built the middle class during the early 20th century. WTF are you talking about??? The rich taking it all is why those places suck.

FUNNY; you want to apply decades old shit to a discussion of current issues. since you want to go there dummy even FDR said public employee unions should be outlawed. they are the majority of union workers now

 

[bedowin62]

Waaaaaaaaaa its all Obama's fault Waaaaaaaaaaa...Bush NEVER did any wrong! waaaaaaaa....trickle down started with our god Reagan but he never did any wrong! WAAAAAAAAA

i'm not crying leftard; you are

i simply asked you and the other loons here to explain how a system that gives a larger amount of money to the Government to be redistributed, isnt also a form of TRICKLE-DOWN

 

[boilermaker55]

Ignore the point if you will. That is your childish atttitude. The thread is all about the economy in this country.
Your ignorant ways and remarks prove once again. You have no real knowledge of what is happening.
So take your insults, which you are not good at anyway, and leave the real discussion to adults.

Read it again! And....think...about what you posted and what the reply says.
Try it again!!!

Paying CEO's ..From 1978 to 2013, CEO compensation, inflation-adjusted, increased 937 percent, a rise more than double stock market growth and substantially greater than the painfully slow 10.2 percent growth in a typical worker’s compensation over the same period.
That seems fair to you?

• That CEO pay grew far faster than pay of the top 0.1 percent of wage earners indicates that CEO compensation growth does not simply reflect the increased market value of highly paid professionals in a competitive market for skills (the “market for talent”) but reflects the presence of substantial rents embedded in executive pay (meaning CEO pay does not reflect greater productivity of executives). Consequently, if CEOs earned less or were taxed more, there would be no adverse impact on output or employment.

The stolen money starts at the beginning . Redistribution is when companies take advantage of the workers and do not pay them a fair marketable wage.
Those crying over being taxed are the culprits. The rich who exploit the workers and poor.

the federal gasoline tax is three times what oil companies make on a gallon of gas. the rich can afford it idiot

tell me who exploits the workers and the poor??????

what is your point?

i read it loon; you dont have a point to make; it's just crybaby whining

 

[bedowin62]

Ignore the point if you will. That is your childish atttitude. The thread is all about the economy in this country.
Your ignorant ways and remarks prove once again. You have no real knowledge of what is happening.
So take your insults, which you are not good at anyway, and leave the real discussion to adults.

Read it again! And....think...about what you posted and what the reply says.
Try it again!!!

Paying CEO's ..From 1978 to 2013, CEO compensation, inflation-adjusted, increased 937 percent, a rise more than double stock market growth and substantially greater than the painfully slow 10.2 percent growth in a typical worker’s compensation over the same period.
That seems fair to you?

• That CEO pay grew far faster than pay of the top 0.1 percent of wage earners indicates that CEO compensation growth does not simply reflect the increased market value of highly paid professionals in a competitive market for skills (the “market for talent”) but reflects the presence of substantial rents embedded in executive pay (meaning CEO pay does not reflect greater productivity of executives). Consequently, if CEOs earned less or were taxed more, there would be no adverse impact on output or employment.

the federal gasoline tax is three times what oil companies make on a gallon of gas. the rich can afford it idiot

tell me who exploits the workers and the poor??????

what is your point?

i read it loon; you dont have a point to make; it's just crybaby whining

just what am i ignoring you idiot? you call ME childish??

is it your position that overly-compensated CEOs are the cause of the economic conditions in this country????

YOU'RE SAYING "this thread is all about the economy in this country". but your post is just a whine about executives, whose compensation is set BY SHAREHOLDER BOARDS.
DIVIDE UP EVERYTHING THEY HAVE, make them as poor as the poorest, and what have you accomplished but to make a bunch of petty, jealous losers feel better genius???

 

[konradv]

You just admitted Clinton had a balanced budget.

if he did who managed that leftard/ who WROTE IT AND PASSED IT????

The Republicans but they had to be dragged and bullied into it by Clinton with them screaming and kicking like little bitches all the way. It was the same thing with welfare reform. Without Clinton laying down the law that Congress would never have done a thing. That's the REAL history. Now just wait as the revisionists chime in.

the Republicans but that's all i needed to see; thanks!!

Typical. Make a decision on partial information. that's the kind of thinking that got us into the Iraq-ISIS mess, when you have a president swearing to Congress that he has intel when it's in actuality, incomplete.

 

[bedowin62]

You just admitted Clinton had a balanced budget.

if he did who managed that leftard/ who WROTE IT AND PASSED IT????

The Republicans but they had to be dragged and bullied into it by Clinton with them screaming and kicking like little bitches all the way. It was the same thing with welfare reform. Without Clinton laying down the law that Congress would never have done a thing. That's the REAL history. Now just wait as the revisionists chime in.

the Republicans but that's all i needed to see; thanks!!

Typical. Make a decision on partial information. that's the kind of thinking that got us into the Iraq-ISIS mess, when you have a president swearing to Congress that he has intel when it's in actuality, incomplete.

not at all crybaby. i made that decision because the rest was just you crying like a baby and excuse-making

 

[konradv]

not at all crybaby. i made that decision because the rest was just you crying like a baby and excuse-making

Give me a break, you cry as a way of life. It's all too typical of some on the right who have a sense of entitlement that leads to tantrums when challenged. Case in point , your inability to stick to a topic without going off on a tangent and name-calling when the situation is pointed out.

 

[boilermaker55]

If you don't want to be insulted. Don't insult someone.
My reply is about paying workers a right and just and liveable wage.
The OP posted about distributing wealth. My comment states what it states to what the OP stated.
If you cannot understand that, then that is how it is and move on.
I am . Insult someone you will be insulted back.

Ignore the point if you will. That is your childish atttitude. The thread is all about the economy in this country.
Your ignorant ways and remarks prove once again. You have no real knowledge of what is happening.
So take your insults, which you are not good at anyway, and leave the real discussion to adults.

Read it again! And....think...about what you posted and what the reply says.
Try it again!!!

Paying CEO's ..From 1978 to 2013, CEO compensation, inflation-adjusted, increased 937 percent, a rise more than double stock market growth and substantially greater than the painfully slow 10.2 percent growth in a typical worker’s compensation over the same period.
That seems fair to you?

• That CEO pay grew far faster than pay of the top 0.1 percent of wage earners indicates that CEO compensation growth does not simply reflect the increased market value of highly paid professionals in a competitive market for skills (the “market for talent”) but reflects the presence of substantial rents embedded in executive pay (meaning CEO pay does not reflect greater productivity of executives). Consequently, if CEOs earned less or were taxed more, there would be no adverse impact on output or employment.

what is your point?

i read it loon; you dont have a point to make; it's just crybaby whining

just what am i ignoring you idiot? you call ME childish??

is it your position that overly-compensated CEOs are the cause of the economic conditions in this country????

YOU'RE SAYING "this thread is all about the economy in this country". but your post is just a whine about executives, whose compensation is set BY SHAREHOLDER BOARDS.
DIVIDE UP EVERYTHING THEY HAVE, make them as poor as the poorest, and what have you accomplished but to make a bunch of petty, jealous losers feel better genius???

 

[bedowin62]

If you don't want to be insulted. Don't insult someone.
My reply is about paying workers a right and just and liveable wage.
The OP posted about distributing wealth. My comment states what it states to what the OP stated.
If you cannot understand that, then that is how it is and move on.
I am . Insult someone you will be insulted back.

Ignore the point if you will. That is your childish atttitude. The thread is all about the economy in this country.
Your ignorant ways and remarks prove once again. You have no real knowledge of what is happening.
So take your insults, which you are not good at anyway, and leave the real discussion to adults.

Read it again! And....think...about what you posted and what the reply says.
Try it again!!!

what is your point?

i read it loon; you dont have a point to make; it's just crybaby whining

just what am i ignoring you idiot? you call ME childish??

is it your position that overly-compensated CEOs are the cause of the economic conditions in this country????

YOU'RE SAYING "this thread is all about the economy in this country". but your post is just a whine about executives, whose compensation is set BY SHAREHOLDER BOARDS.
DIVIDE UP EVERYTHING THEY HAVE, make them as poor as the poorest, and what have you accomplished but to make a bunch of petty, jealous losers feel better genius???

you cant even quantify what a "right and just and liveable wage" is with any degree of accuracy. I could care less if you insult me.