The Left is shameless

[Votto]

That was a second Activist testifying. The star of the article is the girl pictured, she's from Sweden.

1st fakkin sentence. Appearing on Capitol Hill for the second straight day Wednesday, Swedish teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg told U.S. lawmakers she did not want them to listen to her.

The first sentence of quoted article is in regards to the activist from Sweden.

Ironically enough, age of consent in Seattle is 16.

Thats pretty sick.
But it being Seattle I guess I shouldnt be surprised.

I agree, and I think it's also pretty odd that it's only 15 in Sweden.

Cant join the military or buy alcohol but a forty year old horn dog/pedo can bone em.....yikes!!

Well that is what the Left wants if you ask me.

Epstein and the Clinton crowd.

Say, I wonder if GT knew Epstien.

Sure ya wonder, bud. Get a life!

Well you see no problem with 17 year olds, so.......

 

[G.T.]

Thats pretty sick.
But it being Seattle I guess I shouldnt be surprised.

I agree, and I think it's also pretty odd that it's only 15 in Sweden.

Cant join the military or buy alcohol but a forty year old horn dog/pedo can bone em.....yikes!!

Well that is what the Left wants if you ask me.

Epstein and the Clinton crowd.

Say, I wonder if GT knew Epstien.

Sure ya wonder, bud. Get a life!

Well you see no problem with 17 year olds, so.......

I'd love for you to elaborate, weirdo...but I won't hold my breath.

 

[toomuchtime_]

So you are saying the Democrats in Congress are looking to 17 year olds, not 12 year olds, for guidance on these issues. That's so much better.

I'm not saying that, no.

This is a publicity stunt, not looking for guidance on the issue. Anyone could deduce that.

A publicity stunt? Is that what Congress is supposed to do while the are on taxpayers' dime? Clearly you agree that word shameless is appropriate for this hearing.

Is it what Congress is supposed to do?

Yes, in a sense, they have subjects come testify on every single issue...they have Scientists, teachers, activists, athletes, Specialists of all different fields/backgrounds....celebrities of influence...

Congress, yes, has been doing this for decades...and the publicity is helpful for everyone involved - pro or con.

I thought they were supposed to investigate issues and pass legislation on its merits rather than its popularity, but apparently you think its more important to be popular than right. That's a fair description of Obama's presidency.

No, you're inferring incorrectly regarding what I think is important.

I believe in Merit, that'd be ridiculous to assume not - but you're assuming that Legislation is being based on a single activist's testimony in the first place - and nobody knows why the fuck you'd assume THAT, besides you.

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

 

[G.T.]

I'm not saying that, no.

This is a publicity stunt, not looking for guidance on the issue. Anyone could deduce that.

A publicity stunt? Is that what Congress is supposed to do while the are on taxpayers' dime? Clearly you agree that word shameless is appropriate for this hearing.

Is it what Congress is supposed to do?

Yes, in a sense, they have subjects come testify on every single issue...they have Scientists, teachers, activists, athletes, Specialists of all different fields/backgrounds....celebrities of influence...

Congress, yes, has been doing this for decades...and the publicity is helpful for everyone involved - pro or con.

I thought they were supposed to investigate issues and pass legislation on its merits rather than its popularity, but apparently you think its more important to be popular than right. That's a fair description of Obama's presidency.

No, you're inferring incorrectly regarding what I think is important.

I believe in Merit, that'd be ridiculous to assume not - but you're assuming that Legislation is being based on a single activist's testimony in the first place - and nobody knows why the fuck you'd assume THAT, besides you.

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

That's cool.

 

[toomuchtime_]

A publicity stunt? Is that what Congress is supposed to do while the are on taxpayers' dime? Clearly you agree that word shameless is appropriate for this hearing.

Is it what Congress is supposed to do?

Yes, in a sense, they have subjects come testify on every single issue...they have Scientists, teachers, activists, athletes, Specialists of all different fields/backgrounds....celebrities of influence...

Congress, yes, has been doing this for decades...and the publicity is helpful for everyone involved - pro or con.

I thought they were supposed to investigate issues and pass legislation on its merits rather than its popularity, but apparently you think its more important to be popular than right. That's a fair description of Obama's presidency.

No, you're inferring incorrectly regarding what I think is important.

I believe in Merit, that'd be ridiculous to assume not - but you're assuming that Legislation is being based on a single activist's testimony in the first place - and nobody knows why the fuck you'd assume THAT, besides you.

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

That's cool.

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

 

[shockedcanadian]

She's a kid, not a scientist. She's a shill and it is shameless.

A kid shouldn't be trying to convince adults how to act. Furthermore, adults shouldn't be looking for taxpayers to pay for their massive boondoggles, the same ones that have been around since the 1970's, all warnings failed.

They signed a Paris Accord, but they aren't happy as the American taxpayer isn't involved in shipping money to communist China. These global socialist rats pretending to be leaders should tell us, "yeah, we lied about the Paris Accord, it didn't solve a thing and in fact, we need America to fund us".

Rats.

 

[G.T.]

Is it what Congress is supposed to do?

Yes, in a sense, they have subjects come testify on every single issue...they have Scientists, teachers, activists, athletes, Specialists of all different fields/backgrounds....celebrities of influence...

Congress, yes, has been doing this for decades...and the publicity is helpful for everyone involved - pro or con.

I thought they were supposed to investigate issues and pass legislation on its merits rather than its popularity, but apparently you think its more important to be popular than right. That's a fair description of Obama's presidency.

No, you're inferring incorrectly regarding what I think is important.

I believe in Merit, that'd be ridiculous to assume not - but you're assuming that Legislation is being based on a single activist's testimony in the first place - and nobody knows why the fuck you'd assume THAT, besides you.

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

That's cool.

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

 

[toomuchtime_]

I thought they were supposed to investigate issues and pass legislation on its merits rather than its popularity, but apparently you think its more important to be popular than right. That's a fair description of Obama's presidency.

No, you're inferring incorrectly regarding what I think is important.

I believe in Merit, that'd be ridiculous to assume not - but you're assuming that Legislation is being based on a single activist's testimony in the first place - and nobody knows why the fuck you'd assume THAT, besides you.

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

That's cool.

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

The fact that something has been done before doesn't make it any less shameful when it's done again. The real problem is not just the waste of time or the unethical campaigning the Democrats are doing but that this time should have been spent interviewing people who have realistic, practical ideas on how to deal with climate change, but that almost never happens because the issue has become so politicized and so partisan.

 

[G.T.]

No, you're inferring incorrectly regarding what I think is important.

I believe in Merit, that'd be ridiculous to assume not - but you're assuming that Legislation is being based on a single activist's testimony in the first place - and nobody knows why the fuck you'd assume THAT, besides you.

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

That's cool.

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

The fact that something has been done before doesn't make it any less shameful when it's done again. The real problem is not just the waste of time or the unethical campaigning the Democrats are doing but that this time should have been spent interviewing people who have realistic, practical ideas on how to deal with climate change, but that almost never happens because the issue has become so politicized and so partisan.

Man, I can't help but wonder if you all don't just love hearing yourselves whine.

For example, do you really....REALLY (?!?!?!) know that they haven't interviewed experts regarding how to deal with climate change?

Quit smirking and answer...

reeaaaaaaaaaaallllly, bro?

Let's be honest. You don't have the first fuck of a clue who they've interviewed, met with, worked with or solicited regarding climate change.

But you somehow feel fit to sit here and pretend you know what they haven't done.

^that should cause you pause, and reflection, and to wonder if you're not just another mother fuckin sucker in this political hack us vs. them game

 

[Votto]

None of this has to do with legislation. It is all about the Democrats trying to boost their campaign issues. Thunberg was called to testify because she is an appealing personality who will not pin the Democrats down to any specific legislation. The fact is the Democrats have no rational approach to climate change.

That's cool.

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

The fact that something has been done before doesn't make it any less shameful when it's done again. The real problem is not just the waste of time or the unethical campaigning the Democrats are doing but that this time should have been spent interviewing people who have realistic, practical ideas on how to deal with climate change, but that almost never happens because the issue has become so politicized and so partisan.

Man, I can't help but wonder if you all don't just love hearing yourselves whine.

For example, do you really....REALLY (?!?!?!) know that they haven't interviewed experts regarding how to deal with climate change?

Quit smirking and answer...

reeaaaaaaaaaaallllly, bro?

Let's be honest. You don't have the first fuck of a clue who they've interviewed, met with, worked with or solicited regarding climate change.

But you somehow feel fit to sit here and pretend you know what they haven't done.

^that should cause you pause, and reflection, and to wonder if you're not just another mother fuckin sucker in this political hack us vs. them game

Who has Congress had before them who doubts climate change?

Which experts or even laymen like this girl?

 

[G.T.]

That's cool.

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

The fact that something has been done before doesn't make it any less shameful when it's done again. The real problem is not just the waste of time or the unethical campaigning the Democrats are doing but that this time should have been spent interviewing people who have realistic, practical ideas on how to deal with climate change, but that almost never happens because the issue has become so politicized and so partisan.

Man, I can't help but wonder if you all don't just love hearing yourselves whine.

For example, do you really....REALLY (?!?!?!) know that they haven't interviewed experts regarding how to deal with climate change?

Quit smirking and answer...

reeaaaaaaaaaaallllly, bro?

Let's be honest. You don't have the first fuck of a clue who they've interviewed, met with, worked with or solicited regarding climate change.

But you somehow feel fit to sit here and pretend you know what they haven't done.

^that should cause you pause, and reflection, and to wonder if you're not just another mother fuckin sucker in this political hack us vs. them game

Who has Congress had before them who doubts climate change?

Which experts or even laymen like this girl?

Why don't you call your Climate-Change is a Conspiracy Republican Congress Person - and ask them?

What the fuck do you actually seek to accomplish by furthering your little pet-project of the neener-neener us vs. them game on the internet? What have you done with your life, it's gunna amount to this? It all started with the Hannity boards and spiraled out of control?

lol

 

[Votto]

So you think it's "cool" that the Democrats are using the committee to campaign rather than to try to pass legislation?

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

The fact that something has been done before doesn't make it any less shameful when it's done again. The real problem is not just the waste of time or the unethical campaigning the Democrats are doing but that this time should have been spent interviewing people who have realistic, practical ideas on how to deal with climate change, but that almost never happens because the issue has become so politicized and so partisan.

Man, I can't help but wonder if you all don't just love hearing yourselves whine.

For example, do you really....REALLY (?!?!?!) know that they haven't interviewed experts regarding how to deal with climate change?

Quit smirking and answer...

reeaaaaaaaaaaallllly, bro?

Let's be honest. You don't have the first fuck of a clue who they've interviewed, met with, worked with or solicited regarding climate change.

But you somehow feel fit to sit here and pretend you know what they haven't done.

^that should cause you pause, and reflection, and to wonder if you're not just another mother fuckin sucker in this political hack us vs. them game

Who has Congress had before them who doubts climate change?

Which experts or even laymen like this girl?

Why don't you call your Climate-Change is a Conspiracy Republican Congress Person - and ask them?

What the fuck do you actually seek to accomplish by furthering your little pet-project of the neener-neener us vs. them game on the internet? What have you done with your life, it's gunna amount to this? It all started with the Hannity boards and spiraled out of control?

lol

It does not have to be about climate change. When has a conservative perspective ever been brought before Congress to testify?

 

[G.T.]

If that's what they're doing - I wouldn't put it past them - but I'm not going to pretend there's not viable alternatives/perspectives and get myself in a "GGGGRRRRR!!!" over something so small and ridiculous that both sides do on a fairly regular basis since before I was even born.

That would be retarded

The fact that something has been done before doesn't make it any less shameful when it's done again. The real problem is not just the waste of time or the unethical campaigning the Democrats are doing but that this time should have been spent interviewing people who have realistic, practical ideas on how to deal with climate change, but that almost never happens because the issue has become so politicized and so partisan.

Man, I can't help but wonder if you all don't just love hearing yourselves whine.

For example, do you really....REALLY (?!?!?!) know that they haven't interviewed experts regarding how to deal with climate change?

Quit smirking and answer...

reeaaaaaaaaaaallllly, bro?

Let's be honest. You don't have the first fuck of a clue who they've interviewed, met with, worked with or solicited regarding climate change.

But you somehow feel fit to sit here and pretend you know what they haven't done.

^that should cause you pause, and reflection, and to wonder if you're not just another mother fuckin sucker in this political hack us vs. them game

Who has Congress had before them who doubts climate change?

Which experts or even laymen like this girl?

Why don't you call your Climate-Change is a Conspiracy Republican Congress Person - and ask them?

What the fuck do you actually seek to accomplish by furthering your little pet-project of the neener-neener us vs. them game on the internet? What have you done with your life, it's gunna amount to this? It all started with the Hannity boards and spiraled out of control?

lol

It does not have to be about climate change. When has a conservative perspective ever been brought before Congress to testify?

I'm not understanding why you're whining to me that it hasn't, as opposed to petitioning a Conservative Congress-person...

And that's assuming you aren't talking out your ass....which I kind of know you are, and so do you....and are just guessing that "no conservative perspective has ever been brought before congress."

Actually, upon reflection, making that up out of thin air so that you can invent it as a grievance is pretty fucking pathetic, dude.


You NEED this partisan politics shit, huh?

 

[Muhammed]

'This is science': Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg testifies before Congress

Not only will the Left drag out children out of class when they should be in school, to protest guns, they will also drag them before Congress to testify as a 12 year old girl speaks before Congress about the evils of global warming.

What's next? Gerry's kids dragged to protest a lack of abortion access, which is why they are still alive?

The Democrats are desperate now that Jeffrey Epstein is gone.

 

[G.T.]

Damn, took me literally 2 seconds on google to find conservatives testifying before congress, lots of um!!..something votto the whiny literally just said: When has a conservative perspective ever been brought before Congress to testify?

Can somebody explain to me the mental-faculties you have to possess to literally INVENT things to whine about?

Talk about snowflaking!

 

[Votto]

Damn, took me literally 2 seconds on google to find conservatives testifying before congress, lots of um!!..something votto the whiny literally just said: When has a conservative perspective ever been brought before Congress to testify?

Can somebody explain to me the mental-faculties you have to possess to literally INVENT things to whine about?

Talk about snowflaking!

Link?

 

[Nosmo King]

'This is science': Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg testifies before Congress

Not only will the Left drag out children out of class when they should be in school, to protest guns, they will also drag them before Congress to testify as a 12 year old girl speaks before Congress about the evils of global warming.

What's next? Gerry's kids dragged to protest a lack of abortion access, which is why they are still alive?

Here's what ya do...

The next time someone walks into a school with one of those bitchin' cool-ass AR-15s and shoots the place to pieces, get all those kids who slipped in puddles of blood and stepped over their classmate's bodies to tell congress how the assault rifle is too cool to ban. Let them tell you that the shooter's 2nd amendment rights should never be infringed. Get them to sing the virtues of a high capacity clip.

Or get a kid whose house just burned in a wildfire or was swept away by a flood to tell us how climate change is a Chinese hoax.

Or just tell the kids they, like minorities, have no power and should never even consider petitioning the government to redress their grievances.

The American Trumpian! Shooting down dissent for three years running!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

When is the last time you took advise from a 17 year old and who sent her there?

Maybe you should. She seems much, much smarter than you.

 

[Votto]

'This is science': Teen climate activist Greta Thunberg testifies before Congress

Not only will the Left drag out children out of class when they should be in school, to protest guns, they will also drag them before Congress to testify as a 12 year old girl speaks before Congress about the evils of global warming.

What's next? Gerry's kids dragged to protest a lack of abortion access, which is why they are still alive?

Here's what ya do...

The next time someone walks into a school with one of those bitchin' cool-ass AR-15s and shoots the place to pieces, get all those kids who slipped in puddles of blood and stepped over their classmate's bodies to tell congress how the assault rifle is too cool to ban. Let them tell you that the shooter's 2nd amendment rights should never be infringed. Get them to sing the virtues of a high capacity clip.

Or get a kid whose house just burned in a wildfire or was swept away by a flood to tell us how climate change is a Chinese hoax.

Or just tell the kids they, like minorities, have no power and should never even consider petitioning the government to redress their grievances.

The American Trumpian! Shooting down dissent for three years running!

All the children should hold signs, "Trump is Hitler, so give him our guns!"

 

[G.T.]

Damn, took me literally 2 seconds on google to find conservatives testifying before congress, lots of um!!..something votto the whiny literally just said: When has a conservative perspective ever been brought before Congress to testify?

Can somebody explain to me the mental-faculties you have to possess to literally INVENT things to whine about?

Talk about snowflaking!

Link?

Are you even really fucking serious right now? Do you know how pathetic that is?

How about, ohhh for starters the hearing about white nationalism...

The Republicans had 3 witnesses, including conservative commentator candace owens (black chick)

not good enough? how many do i have to do before you eat your fucking shoe you nance?

dennis prager, conservative radio host on free speech?

I'm not doing this bullshit for your dumbass, votto you little baby...holy fuckin shit