The left embraces socialism .

I agree, it would be progress if the corporations we bailed out were forced to repay their debt to the government, or better yet, the car industries had all crashed and burned. Then the German car industry would have had a much better market here. Germans are better with their money and industry, given their socialistic systems.

It would be progress if the government would stop bailing out companies in the first place.

Yes, monopolies do not need help. Small business is a whole different story....and we've never bailed out a small local company, in fact, we just ignore them.
we wish !! ignore us and keep your higher taxes and regulations !! small business owners are not socialist !! and most of them hate the left !!
 
Last edited:
they do !!! when questioned about this most leftist do not even deny it.they believe in income redistribution ,gov regulations out the ass,and tax,tax,tax. they are on an all out assault on the second amendment,weakening our military,class warfare and government control over our very healthcare.AND THE LIST OF THE SOCIALIST[COMMUNIST] AGENDA THEY ARE PUSHING AND ENACTING GOES ON AND ON .Stalin would be proud

And yet the right keeps funding our socialized national security with Keynesian defense spending that dwarfs the rest of the world.

Chew on that one, nitwit.

Hey genius, check the US Constitution.
"...Provide for the common defense"....Mean anything to ya?
Though not..
Preamble...
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

These words are held near and dear to the heart of every patriotic American.
You libs use them as a punchline. You bend twist and misconstrue them for your own reasons as well as use them for your own personal/political gain.
 
Ultra right radicials "bend twist and misconstrue them for [their] own reasons as well as use them for [their] own personal/political gain." Grow the FU.
 
they do !!! when questioned about this most leftist do not even deny it.they believe in income redistribution ,gov regulations out the ass,and tax,tax,tax. they are on an all out assault on the second amendment,weakening our military,class warfare and government control over our very healthcare.AND THE LIST OF THE SOCIALIST[COMMUNIST] AGENDA THEY ARE PUSHING AND ENACTING GOES ON AND ON .Stalin would be proud

LMFAO....what a paranoid idiot. Gotta love people like this. Unfortunately, I think there is more of them somehow.
 
There at least ten types of socialism, most were despised by Marx, but Marx created his own type for nations to use to enter communism, he named this prep program Scientific Socialism. That became key for everyone to believe that socialism leads to communism.
The USSR dropped Scientific Socialism a few years after their revolution as useless, in fact the USSR dropped the whole concept of Marx except for the name.
Today most industrial nations including the United States have a mixed economy, capitalism and socialism, but you can still scare the bejabbers out of people with the idea that socialism leads to communism.
 
Definition of SOCIALISM by kiwiman. 1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods. No Source. Here is a better one: so•cial•ism /ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/ Noun
1. A political and economic theory of that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated...(in Marxist theory) A transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of communism. Question to the ultra right and libertarian loons: how is the Reed-McConnel plan a “socialist plan”?


2 : a system of society or group living in which there is no private property That's exactly what Obama and his drones believe in. Well, that's an assertion without evidence.

b : a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state That's exactly what Obama and his drones believe in. Well, that's an assertion without evidence.

No wonder the ultra right gets maybe 10% of the vote and the libertars about 3%. They are simply so empty: just yelling and smelling.
Hey spongebrain square head...Those are DEFINITIONS....
Ultra right sponge brains and libertarian square heads don't get it at all.

To define socialism as "a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state" and then state "That's exactly what Obama and his drones believe in" is an ASSERTION. There is no evidence.

To define socialism as "a system of society or group living in which there is no private property That's exactly what Obama and his drones believe in" is an ASSERTION. There is no evidence.
.
Sheesh.
Yes and a man guilty of murder goes free because the cops acting on good faith search the trash cans on the sidewalk. A judge ruled that even though the trash cans were placed on a public sidewalk in a city owned right of way, the trash cans are protected under the 4th amendment.
That is a technicality.....And so is your assertion.
 
Not at all, and you demonstrate you cannot think objectively and logically.
 
Obama acts on emotion. He does not think things through. And in typical liberal parlance, never considers the consequences of his decisions..

I voted against Obama, and you just described yourself with this comment, not Obama.

SO what?....
Means nothing. You still support his every decision.

That's because They

koolaiddrinkup01.gif


and jump

bozwarsn.gif
 
Why shouldnt I embrace socialism? What do you have against the fire department? They cutting in on your dream of becoming a modern day Marcus Licinius Crassus?
 
Why shouldnt I embrace socialism? What do you have against the fire department? They cutting in on your dream of becoming a modern day Marcus Licinius Crassus?

The fire department allows its employees to retire at age 50 on a 100% pension. That's one reason many cities are going bankrupt.

Private fire departments are cheaper by several orders of magnitude.
 
Are they as efficient, bripat? Are they as cost effective? Do they service the community better?

Until you stop making profound sweeping statements of stupidity laughter sweeps throughout the hall.
 

Forum List

Back
Top