Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 9,152
- 6,928
- 1,938
Could be a left or right wing partisan.when you say people who disagree with you are terrorists and enemy of the state
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could be a left or right wing partisan.when you say people who disagree with you are terrorists and enemy of the state
But -- and I'm sure as hell no lawyer --
Hillary's?You mean Hillary's Russian collusion lie?
So the Supes deny Trump's efforts to get over 700 pages of documents from the National Archives. Documents that Trump and his attorneys have been desperately trying to keep sealed.
This early on, the only thing I'm hearing about is a draft document that would have ordered the Secretary of Defense to leverage the military to seize voting machines that Trump's people didn't like.
Okay, yes, that's insane, and yes, the completely unhinged General Flynn (Q-Foxhole) and people like him were all ready to hit the streets with guns to save America from the evil commies 'n stuff.
But -- and I'm sure as hell no lawyer -- Trump didn't write it and didn't implement it. Who knows what other fantastical madness was floating around the Oval Office, but he can just deny all of it. And in reality, that's a perfectly fair and reasonable defense.
Is anyone seeing anything else from these documents that actually indicate crime or clear criminal intent? The fact that he tried so hard to keep them locked up is definitely smoke, but is there any actual fire here? This all just gets more weird.
Story/Link: January 6 riot probe gets over 700 pages of Trump White House documents after Supreme Court ruling
when you want to pass laws to stop being critical of elections
when you want to federalize state powers so you can control the vote
when you say people who disagree with you are terrorists and enemy of the state
what are you?
show me the right pushing for these.A member of the duopoly.
Well, if I as an executive surround myself with sycophants who draft executive orders without the Executive ordering them... they or I or both of us are in serious legal troubleIt's pretty obvious that Trump was surrounded by insane people promoting authoritarian ideas.
That's how things like this draft order get written and you can bet Trump considered signing them.
Other people...right wingers certainly but SANE...advised him that he should NOT do this and I'm sure let him realize that should these anti-democratic attempts fail that he would be in serious legal jeopardy.
But this is only ONE of the things we will find.
Putting together the timelines of communications should be much more revealing
The fact that Trump himself personally endorsed the various swing states to use these fake electors, then have them forge signatures to overthrow our election is a slam dunk case to overthrow our election. How do we know this? We have audio evidence of Trump endorsing it. And, the Georgia audio with Brad Raffensberger is in fact a smoking gun; CNN audio reveals Michigan GOP co-chair saying Trump campaign directed fake electors to overturn Biden winSo the Supes deny Trump's efforts to get over 700 pages of documents from the National Archives. Documents that Trump and his attorneys have been desperately trying to keep sealed.
This early on, the only thing I'm hearing about is a draft document that would have ordered the Secretary of Defense to leverage the military to seize voting machines that Trump's people didn't like.
Okay, yes, that's insane, and yes, the completely unhinged General Flynn (Q-Foxhole) and people like him were all ready to hit the streets with guns to save America from the evil commies 'n stuff.
But -- and I'm sure as hell no lawyer -- Trump didn't write it and didn't implement it. Who knows what other fantastical madness was floating around the Oval Office, but he can just deny all of it. And in reality, that's a perfectly fair and reasonable defense.
Is anyone seeing anything else from these documents that actually indicate crime or clear criminal intent? The fact that he tried so hard to keep them locked up is definitely smoke, but is there any actual fire here? This all just gets more weird.
Story/Link: January 6 riot probe gets over 700 pages of Trump White House documents after Supreme Court ruling
show me the right pushing for these.
If you are on video saying there is nothing wrong with recalculating votes in your favor, that's a gift for intent.The smoke is pretty thick, the characters are all pretty obvious, partially insane and transparent, but criminal shit has to be proven.
If not, it's legally the same as if they spent all that time in the Oval Office playing Canasta™.
An example would be Trump's election tampering phone all to GA. That's right there and in his voice. I guess we'll see soon enough.
The fact that Trump himself personally endorsed the various swing states to use these fake electors, then have them forge signatures to overthrow our election is a slam dunk case to overthrow our election. How do we know this? We have audio evidence of Trump endorsing it. And, the Georgia audio with Brad Raffensberger is in fact a smoking gun; CNN audio reveals Michigan GOP co-chair saying Trump campaign directed fake electors to overturn Biden win
Thanks for the surrender.
I knew this was a lost cause a year ago. I'm amazed that otherwise reasonable people are just now starting to come to terms with it. Trump deeply offended some people I guess.The GA call is blatant and obvious and should be actionable.
Yet I won't be surprised in the least if it doesn't go anywhere.
That's possible, but it is also too obvious. Let's see if they try and wiggle out of the obvious.The GA call is blatant and obvious and should be actionable.
Yet I won't be surprised in the least if it doesn't go anywhere.
Trump did way more than that. He tried to overthrow a legal election by recalculating votes. It's sinister, it's illegal, and it's unamerican.I knew this was a lost cause a year ago. I'm amazed that otherwise reasonable people are just now starting to come to terms with it. Trump deeply offended some people I guess.
Because they're all guilty.
So the Supes deny Trump's efforts to get over 700 pages of documents from the National Archives. Documents that Trump and his attorneys have been desperately trying to keep sealed.
This early on, the only thing I'm hearing about is a draft document that would have ordered the Secretary of Defense to leverage the military to seize voting machines that Trump's people didn't like.
Okay, yes, that's insane, and yes, the completely unhinged General Flynn (Q-Foxhole) and people like him were all ready to hit the streets with guns to save America from the evil commies 'n stuff.
But -- and I'm sure as hell no lawyer -- Trump didn't write it and didn't implement it. Who knows what other fantastical madness was floating around the Oval Office, but he can just deny all of it. And in reality, that's a perfectly fair and reasonable defense.
Is anyone seeing anything else from these documents that actually indicate crime or clear criminal intent? The fact that he tried so hard to keep them locked up is definitely smoke, but is there any actual fire here? This all just gets more weird.
Story/Link: January 6 riot probe gets over 700 pages of Trump White House
So the Supes deny Trump's efforts to get over 700 pages of documents from the National Archives. Documents that Trump and his attorneys have been desperately trying to keep sealed.
This early on, the only thing I'm hearing about is a draft document that would have ordered the Secretary of Defense to leverage the military to seize voting machines that Trump's people didn't like.
Okay, yes, that's insane, and yes, the completely unhinged General Flynn (Q-Foxhole) and people like him were all ready to hit the streets with guns to save America from the evil commies 'n stuff.
But -- and I'm sure as hell no lawyer -- Trump didn't write it and didn't implement it. Who knows what other fantastical madness was floating around the Oval Office, but he can just deny all of it. And in reality, that's a perfectly fair and reasonable defense.
Is anyone seeing anything else from these documents that actually indicate crime or clear criminal intent? The fact that he tried so hard to keep them locked up is definitely smoke, but is there any actual fire here? This all just gets more weird.
Story/Link: January 6 riot probe gets over 700 pages of Trump White House documents after Supreme Court ruling
You're screaming at the sky. It's a waste of energy. Let's focus on something productive.Trump did way more than that. He tried to overthrow a legal election by recalculating votes. It's sinister, it's illegal, and it's unamerican.
CAn't go over 700+ pages in a weekend.So the Supes deny Trump's efforts to get over 700 pages of documents from the National Archives. Documents that Trump and his attorneys have been desperately trying to keep sealed.
This early on, the only thing I'm hearing about is a draft document that would have ordered the Secretary of Defense to leverage the military to seize voting machines that Trump's people didn't like.
Okay, yes, that's insane, and yes, the completely unhinged General Flynn (Q-Foxhole) and people like him were all ready to hit the streets with guns to save America from the evil commies 'n stuff.
But -- and I'm sure as hell no lawyer -- Trump didn't write it and didn't implement it. Who knows what other fantastical madness was floating around the Oval Office, but he can just deny all of it. And in reality, that's a perfectly fair and reasonable defense.
Is anyone seeing anything else from these documents that actually indicate crime or clear criminal intent? The fact that he tried so hard to keep them locked up is definitely smoke, but is there any actual fire here? This all just gets more weird.
Story/Link: January 6 riot probe gets over 700 pages of Trump White House documents after Supreme Court ruling