- Banned
- #181
No, it is you who is gullible -- so gullible that your best citation source is a blatantly partisan House committee. That committee acted in response to one blog post by a former NOAA scientist who later clarified what he meant.
This is easily fact-checkable.
![]()
No Data Manipulation at NOAA - FactCheck.org
Top Republicans on the House science committee claim a former National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientist “confirmed” that his NOAA colleagues “manipulated” climate data for a 2015 study. But that scientist denies that he accused NOAA of manipulating data.www.factcheck.org
Moreover, the scientist who was accused of manipulating the climate warming "hiatus" data had his findings supported by other studies.
![]()
New analysis shows Lamar Smith’s accusations on climate data are wrong
It wasn’t a political plot—temperatures really did get warmer.arstechnica.com
Once again, you prove my point: you've gone down the partisan rabbit hole of sticking with sources of information who agree with you and only those. Moreover, these sources of yours don't do any scientific research. They don't publish data. They publish opinions and mostly misleading factual assertions about the topic. That is it. The scientists are the ones publishing the data based on scientific observation. If you want to challenge them, then find scientific experts of similar caliber who are in a position to challenge them with scientific facts. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
A partisan committee led by climate-change skeptic partisans is not an official government source. It's a government record of testimony. That's it. In no way does this support your argument - at all.
You stupid Environmental Wacko turkeys can deny it all you want but the indisputable fact is that both NOAA and NASA have been caught red handed manipulating climate data. Also the UN Climate Commission and many of the climate scientists.
That is not even debatable. It happen and is part of the public record.
Liars have no credibility. We caught them lying during The Worthless Negro's administration and they are back again now with Potatohead.
If there was real AGW data available then there would be no need to lie, would there?
I know this is a religion to you idiots and you will deny everything but the scam has been found it.
There is no man made climate change.