How about you show us some of these failed predictions? We've already gone through the list of 41 that you'd all been passed by your fossil fuel sources and not a single one of them was produced by an actual research scientist. Let's see the new list Whizzo.
Link, fool.
Your best strategy would be to read the studies of his source. You know, actual science.
You're here.
NOAA was caught lying and manipulating their data. Not a credible source.There's plenty of data. Nearly 4 times as many record highs as there were record lows - that ratio is even higher globally. You can argue it's just one year, but there's already plenty of data indicating what's going on with global mean temperatures, and what's more, the global mean temps have risen as industrial CO2 has risen. It's pretty obvious what's happening. Deny all you wish but I won't take you seriously and neither will anyone who understands basic science.
Daily Weather Records | Data Tools | Climate Data Online (CDO) | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
Daily Weather Record tool built using climate and weather data from Climate Data Online (CDO).www.ncdc.noaa.gov
View attachment 799054
Sure there is, just like there are natural forest fires and just like a species can die off naturally without human intervention. And then there's also forest fires caused by arsonists, forests completely cleared because humans cut them all down, and species extinction caused by humans. Yes, climate change happened in the past before the industrial revolution, but that's not what we're talking about here. We're talking about human-caused climate change, which is observed and real.
Okay, good, you accept that - this is a start.
But there is.
No, AGW conflicts with your ideology, which is the problem. You don't want AGW to be real, but it is.
It's not "again" fool. It never stopped.
www.epa.gov
I just stated that humans can AFFECT the climate, not "control the weather" and that doctors do not allow sex to be changed "on a whim". Do you have some sort of basic comprehension issue or are you just another liar?
On what basis do you classify it as a religion? Have you considered my offer to compare the amount of evidence supporting AGW versus the amount of evidence supporting the existence of your god? You do believe in a god, don't you? You DO have a religion, don't you?
Where's the quote?
This tells me two things: You don't know diddly-squat about climate science OR Marxism.
A global report shows significantly more new record highs than lows. That's not cherry-picking you ignoramus.
You guys are so ******* stupid about this. How long do you think any of those fellows will live in those locations? Two years? Ten years? They will sell them - likely to some fool like you who doesn't believe the seas are rising - long before the ocean is knocking at their doors and move on. These guys are rich. They buy houses outright with what they've got in their checking account.
Will do.
Bullshit. If you think so, let's see some links.
There are mountains of it. www.ipcc.ch has the ******* summary and its more text than you've read your entire life.
Why don't you just get a t-shirt that says "I'm stupid and I lie"
Oh my GOD why did we never realize that?!?!?!?!?!
Oh my GOD say it isn't SO!!!!
There are no proofs in the natural sciences, but there is enough evidence that damn near every scientist on this whole stinking planet accepts it as a fact.
Poster Flash doesn't have the faintest **** of an idea what he's talking about.
