I looked at it on archive.
The government wasn’t actually censoring. Facebook and social media companies were not interested in being the purveyors of harmful misinformation.Appeals to emotion, and state propaganda about anecdotal incidents are no grounds for government censorship or the destruction of the first Amendment.
Sorry, that's just a fallacious argument, right out the gate.
Lot's of folks knew, at the founding of our nation, that Small Pox was deadly, and being inoculated against it, reduced your chances of mortality.
The excess mortality of Small Pox is so much higher than COVID, it is astoundingly disingenuous to even compare the two.
There wasn't even a general mandate for inoculation, or control over information around that. Only General Washington mandated his troops do it, since. . . well yeah, he was a military commander and he could do that.
". . Regardless of some Bostonians' reservations, Boylston continued the inoculation procedures and studied previous outbreaks. To prove the safety of inoculations, Boylston compared outbreaks to demonstrate that inoculations were relatively safe. Boylston noted that during the epidemic of 1721, the estimated fatality rate of those who naturally contracted smallpox was 14%, while the fatality rate of the inoculated was only 2%. Though many Bostonians feared and distrusted the procedure initially, in subsequent outbreaks inoculation was slowly accepted.[6]. . "
Back then? Even THEY knew you quarantine the sick. . . NOT THE HEALTHY!
IN FACT, ones chances of dying from the actual inoculation intended to protect against small pox in the late eighteenth century, were still, FAR HIGHER, than the chance of dying from COVID (regardless of whether or not you received the jab.)
That is how exaggerated and bullshit COVID was. It was an excuse by the global and national government to trample folks civil rights and civil liberties.
. . . the founders knew this. Most of them survived inoculation themselves.
AND YET? They made no provision in the Constitution for the right of the government to censor speech, or force the general public to have any medical procedure.
The law regularly has to prove what is going on in someone’s mind. It’s not a new issue.Ahhhhh. . . . so you have clairvoyance to see into the minds of men now?
No, they were adjudicated when the court ruled that they had failed to demonstrate that the person they were suing had harmed them.
Did mainstream media say if one took the vaccine, one wouldn’t get Wuhan?
Nope
Fk no, stop projecting
More than likely, yeah.
Nope, the government applied pressure to them, implying that their monoply statuses would be revoked if they did not do what the totalitarians in government wanted them to.
There was absolutely NO SUCH implication of anything being “revoked”, whatever you mean by “monopoly status”.Nope, the government applied pressure to them, implying that their monoply statuses would be revoked if they did not do what the totalitarians in government wanted them to.
Even Zuck, who tends to be on the left, had said he was uncomfortable with the corrupt pressure applied.
just stahp already
This is garbage.
They’ll say he liedNope, the government applied pressure to them, implying that their monoply statuses would be revoked if they did not do what the totalitarians in government wanted them to.
Even Zuck, who tends to be on the left, had said he was uncomfortable with the corrupt pressure applied.
just stahp already
Nope, Zuckerbergs own words calls you a disinformation cuck
Show me where Zuckerberg said they were threatened with some gibberish about monopoly status.
But was it misinformation? Much of what was being said was good information that was being suppressed by politics.
But the law ain't gonna do that in this case, because nothing illegal has been done! You know this, why are you being so oily?
So if people are never controlled by what they read online, how can anyone sue for damages of defamation?If you are now going to just resort to lies and misrepresentations, there is no need for us to continue. Just admit, you lost. The neo-libs are as bad and tyrannical as the neo-cons.
Social media is NOT responsible for anything anyone writes, and again, it matters not what individual citizens opine on, even it it is out and out lies. They have a responsibility to report criminalized speech, but that is all. They are not liable for folks posting child porn and the like though.
. . . and health lies and misinformation is protected speech. How many times do you need be told this?
Section 230 is Good, Actually
Even though it’s only 26 words long, Section 230 doesn’t say what many think it does. So we’ve decided to take up a few kilobytes of the Internet to explain what, exactly, people are getting wrong about the primary law that defends the Internet.Section 230 (47 U.S.C. § 230) is one of the most...www.eff.org
And you should stop with this fallacy that what other citizens say or write is the cause of action for others. Everyone is responsible for their own actions, regardless of what other say or write.
The person that is, in the end, responsible for their own health are the individuals. If they die are make poor decisions, it has nothing to do with what others write.
View attachment 1032956
View attachment 1032955Fundamental Attribution Error: What It Is & How to Avoid It
The fundamental attribution error plays a central role in how we understand the actions of others and how we justify our own.online.hbs.edu
Ma Ball was violating the Sherman Anti Trust ActThis is garbage.
We no longer have a need for the FCC, it probably needs to be disolved.
The day corporate oligarchs took ATT to court to break up MA BELL, b/c they knew there were more opportunities to rape the public with new communications technologies, is the day the need for the FCC died.
The government has not a shadow of a right to regulate public discourse now. The only excuse back in days gone by, is the limited amount of TV and radio frequencies.
Licensing should be done on a first come first serve basis, and regulation of monopolies on them, can still be done via the FTC, as useless as it is now being a tool of the oligarchs.
