The individuals in the American left wing media need to be charged with high treason and treated accordingly. Start with Tapper

[MisterBeale]

The allegations were found to be false. They lost 6-3 at SCOTUS.

Murthy v. Missouri - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Hell, Facebook asked the government for assistance to combat COVID misinformation.

I know. That is because statists on the left and right wish to destroy the First Amendment.

Whenever the establishment does NOT want to touch the facts of an issue these day, they don't even hear the case, they dimiss it on "standing."

No one ever heard the Trump claims on a fraudulent election, they just dismissed it on bogus standing excuses.

The deep state runs the corrupt courts in this nation. . . or did you not know?


From your own link;

"In October 2023, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Murthy v. Missouri.[27] The Court also lifted the injunctions set by the lower courts, allowing the federal government to continue to contact social media companies without restrictions while the case continues. Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the lifting of the injunctions, with Alito writing, "Government censorship of private speech is antithetical to our democratic form of government, and therefore today's decision is highly disturbing."[28] The Court heard oral argument on March 18, 2024.[29]

The Supreme Court issued its decision on June 26, 2024. The 6–3 majority determined that neither the states nor other respondents had standing under Article III, reversing the Fifth Circuit decision. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the opinion, stating: "To establish standing, the plaintiffs must demonstrate a substantial risk that, in the near future, they will suffer an injury that is traceable to a government defendant and redressable by the injunction they seek. Because no plaintiff has carried that burden, none has standing to seek a preliminary injunction."[30]

Justice Alito wrote the dissent, joined by Thomas and Gorsuch. He wrote that this was "one of the most important free speech cases to reach this Court in years",[30] that the respondents had brought enough evidence to suggest the government's actions were unconstitutional, but that the Court "shirks that duty and thus permits the successful campaign of coercion in this case to stand as an attractive model for future officials who want to control what the people say, hear, and think. That is regrettable."[30]"

Murthy v. Missouri - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[MisterBeale]

It's more than proven that the Russia hoax was a deliberate lie put out by the media and then he flat out denies what we all witnessed him claim. The media are on scripts and the media by and large are sentinels for the globalist cabal of the enemies of this country. Freedom of speech doesn't protect high treason.

While I agree with you, I am also smart enough to know how folks mental processes work.

It has also been pretty conclusively show, that Biden won that last election, but I do not fault folks for denying that either.

The election was so close, sure, maybe shenanigans could have altered the result. Likewise, it is also known that Russia HAS been using various methods to try to influence US policy.

You can't convict folks for this;

"Confirmation bias (also confirmatory bias, myside bias,[a] or congeniality bias[2]) is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms or supports one's prior beliefs or values.[3] People display this bias when they select information that supports their views, ignoring contrary information, or when they interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing attitudes. The effect is strongest for desired outcomes, for emotionally charged issues, and for deeply entrenched beliefs.

Biased search for information, biased interpretation of this information, and biased memory recall, have been invoked to explain four specific effects:

1. attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence)
2. belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false)
3. the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series)
4. illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations). . . "

Cognitive dissonance - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Marener]

I know. That is because statists on the left and right wish to destroy the First Amendment.

Whenever the establishment does NOT want to touch the facts of an issue these day, they don't even hear the case, they dimiss it on "standing."

No one ever heard the Trump claims on a fraudulent election, they just dismissed it on bogus standing excuses.

The deep state runs the corrupt courts in this nation. . . or did you not know?

They dismissed it on standing because none of the people who sued the government could show that the government did anything to harm them.

The facts are that these people couldn’t even pass the most basic requirement to sue.

That’s the whole point. That’s what we’ve been saying. These lawsuits are totally baseless.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Nope. Real convictions. More on the way (hopefully).

Seriously, those were fake convictions for the gullible. Sorry if that hits close to home (not sorry).

 

[MisterBeale]

Oh my, you’re quite wrong. The vaccine absolutely is quite effective at preventing death.

You pull a lot of things out of your ass when something totally unprecedented happens. Gotta start somewhere.

No more than the flu shot has been found effective at reducing mortality.

But we do not censor folks on that premise.

 

[Blisterfinger]

If they’re in the situation described by the ad, they’re already seeking media attention. Your concern is phony. The real concern is that it might convince people to vote for the ballot measure that Republicans don’t like, which is why the phony threat came from DeSantis’s office and not from the department of health.

There remains a lot of ambiguity in the law about what situations constitute a threat to their health. Cancer is not specified and may not be a part of the exceptions outlined.

Given the ambiguity of the law, opinions vary. You want the government to be the arbiter of truth now? Crazy.

If someone said COVID was no worse than a common cold, wouldn’t that convince them not to get medical attention because they think they don’t need it? If someone said that hospitals are trying to hurt people who have COVID because they get paid more, wouldn’t that convince them not to seek medical attention?

This might be useful information.

Not everyone who had covid needed to seek medical attention. In fact the percentage was pretty low. Couldn't we just leave it up to the people and not some Talking Heads.? If you're stupid enough not to seek medical attention if you need it, then there is a term for that, "survival of the fittest"

 

[Marener]

No more than the flu shot has been found effective at reducing mortality.

But we do not censor folks on that premise.

This is quite untrue. There is ample evidence the vaccines prevented hundreds of thousands to millions of deaths.

I agree we don’t censor on medical misinformation. Florida tried to; which is the topic.

 

[MisterBeale]

They dismissed it on standing because none of the people who sued the government could show that the government did anything to harm them.

The facts are that these people couldn’t even pass the most basic requirement to sue.

That’s the whole point. That’s what we’ve been saying. These lawsuits are totally baseless.

Nice to see you carry water for totalitarians.

I have always wondered why you write the dumbshit you do.

I admit, you are correct. That state does not care about civil rights and civil liberties unless the absolutely destitute, oppressed and poor folks can come up with the money, time and other resources to sue.

But why would those folks do that? They know that the elites will now crucify and destroy their lives if they dared try.

 

[Marener]

Not everyone who had covid needed to seek medical attention. In fact the percentage was pretty low. Couldn't we just leave it up to the people and not some Talking Heads.? If you're stupid enough not to seek medical attention if you need it, then there is a term for that, "survival of the fittest"

True, but there were people who did not seek medical attention because of COVID misinformation.

If you’re interested in a deep dig into one example of this, there’s a great podcast called we were three. It’s heart breaking.

We Were Three (Published 2022)

A story of lies, family, America and what Covid revealed, as well as what it destroyed.

www.nytimes.com

 

[jc456]

34 convictions...ask martybegan...he agrees that your blob has been convicted.

Right Marty? Or are you going to play dead?

but he hasn't been. the trial is still pending.

 

[Marener]

Nice to see you carry water for totalitarians.

I have always wondered why you write the dumbshit you do.

I admit, you are correct. That state does not care about civil rights and civil liberties unless the absolutely destitute, oppressed and poor folks can come up with the money, time and other resources to sue.

But why would those folks do that? They know that the elites will now crucify and destroy their lives if they dared try.

I’m trying to explain it simply to you.

In order to sue someone, you first have to show that someone harmed you.

The people who sued the government could not show that the government did any harm to them. It’s literally the first step to suing someone. They couldn’t even do that.

I don’t know where you got that Amy Coney Barrett is a deep state lib, but you really need to start thinking a little more critically.

 

[MisterBeale]

There is ample evidence the vaccines prevented hundreds of thousands to millions of deaths.

And there is just as much evidence about the flu shot, but the deep state never tried censor or force those on anyone.

I agree we don’t censor on medical misinformation. Florida tried to; which is the topic.

Nope, the topic is the neo-cons acting to try to destroy America, just like the neo-libs do.

None of them give a shit about the Constitution or the people anymore.

 

[struth]

It’s just your opinion that the ads in Florida were lying. But thanks for reminding us of another instances where free speech is under attack by the right wing.

It’s not an opinion as to what day the election is on or whether you can vote by phone. Those are clear lies intended to deprive an individual of their constitutional rights.

It’s not an opinion, we can see the law, and we can see what the ad claimed.

The ad was lies

 

[jc456]

Oh my, you’re quite wrong. The vaccine absolutely is quite effective at preventing death.

You pull a lot of things out of your ass when something totally unprecedented happens. Gotta start somewhere.

does it protect one from Wuhan?
can one still infect others?

Have their been deaths due to the vaccine?

Death after the Administration of COVID-19 Vaccines Approved by EMA: Has a Causal Relationship Been Demonstrated? - PMC

More than eight billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered globally so far and 44.29% of people are fully vaccinated. Pre-authorization clinical trials were carried out and the safety of vaccines is still continuously monitored ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[MisterBeale]

In order to sue someone, you first have to show that someone harmed you.

I know this. And if the common folks dare try? They establishment crush them.

I don’t know where you got that Amy Coney Barrett is a deep state lib, but you really need to start thinking a little more critically.

I never said she was a neo-lib, she is a Heritage foundation neo-con. She cares more about the power of the state than the civil rights and civil liberties of the common folks.

There isn't a dimes worth of difference tween the two types of deep state shills for real Americans.

 

[Blisterfinger]

True, but there were people who did not seek medical attention because of COVID misinformation.

If you’re interested in a deep dig into one example of this, there’s a great podcast called we were three. It’s heart breaking.

We Were Three (Published 2022)

A story of lies, family, America and what Covid revealed, as well as what it destroyed.

www.nytimes.com

Cannot do New York Times. Paywall. There are always people who are going to die because they don't seek medical attention or seek it too late. Any disease anytime. Whether it's due to misinformation or just the way they were brought up or their life situation I don't believe censorship is the answer to the problem. The Democrats turned covid political, I believe more people died because of that than needed to. TDS killed many.

 

[MisterBeale]

It’s not an opinion as to what day the election is on or whether you can vote by phone. Those are clear lies intended to deprive an individual of their constitutional rights.

If folks are so uninformed as to not know this information, or understand that these are statements of satire. . . they have no business voting in the first place.

Nice to see you, once again, standing for the agenda of the oligarchs.

not

 

[jc456]

Just waiting for the name of the person indefinitely imprisoned for trespassing.

Unless you’re willing to admit that was bullshit.

you won't, there isn't prison time for trespassing. Can't you demofks do any research?

 

[Marener]

If folks are so uninformed as to not know this information, or understand that these are statements of satire. . . they have no business voting in the first place.

Nice to see you, once again, standing for the agenda of the oligarchs.

not

It was not satire. It was intentional to affect the election.

 

[22lcidw]

Given Trump has already publicly advocated for the government to take away broadcast licenses because he didn’t like what ABC and CBS said about him, your hopes are dashed that he would be above the fray.

Come on. Near all TV networks are Progressive Socialist dominated. Republicans are persona non grata. And if they are part of some programming, they are RINO light. Watching any form of entertainment is now propaganda. You can see the differences of older programs as compared to now. News people with long backgrounds are now frauds. And in fact, looking to other eras and they were around helped Progs in their way then. They even destroyed a President in the 1970's.