Richard Goldstone should have Also refused point blank because of a conflict of interest
Goldstone is a war criminal himself. He has a very colorful history in South Africa.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Richard Goldstone should have Also refused point blank because of a conflict of interest
This is nothing but a bullshit hit piece. His business with the PLO had nothing to do with Israel. Therefore, it's not proof of bias. That's just what you're trying to frame it as. As far as I'm concerned, you can stick that "perception management" crap where the sun don't shine. Israel committed war crimes. You don't have to be bias to see that.The man hailed by defenders as a world-class jurist didn’t think that having been paid to provide a legal briefing for the PLO might constitute a conflict of interest.
The indelible stain on the UN committee once chaired by William Schabas - Arab-Israeli Conflict - Jerusalem Post
Here we go, folks.
As far as your links reference to Goldstone and his report, he merely said it would be written differently. He didn't recant any of his allegations. And the 4 other members of that committee have never wavered from their conclusions. They still stand by that report.
Israel thinks its above the law and will trash anyone that thinks otherwise.
You're FOS. You need to stop doing the things that make people want to destroy you.Working for PLO is biased, because their entire work is connected with destroying israel in one way or another.
You lie about everything, and I catch you lying in 90% of your posts. So, I know you are lying now.
Goldstone was forced to recant. Happens a lot to Jews that criticize Israel/Jews, apparently. It happened to Ariel Toaff. He had to take a book out of publication.
Their work is dedicated to the achievement of their freedom from occupation and oppression for the Christians and Muslims of Palestine.