Even using the expression, "the rich" is preposterous. It is exactly the same as speaking about a race or ethnic group as though any generalization would apply to all of them.
What is "rich"? Ask a hundred people about it and although one's current circumstances will have a big impact, there will be a hundred different responses. If 20-year-old ME had known that 70-year-old ME would have as much money in investments as I have now, I would have considered that "rich," but I ain't.
As for any "rich" person, the real question is, "How did s/he get that way?"
- inherited wealth?
- Married into wealth?
- hard work and starting a business?
- inventor?
- Writer, musician, artist?
- Corporate success?
- Other employment success (great sales person)?
- Learned professional (doctor, dentist, lawyer, etc.)?
- Smart investor?
Is "rich" a matter of INCOME, or ACCUMULATED POSSESSIONS/INVESTMENTS?
The current culture seems to resent those who achieve success partly because of "advantages" in family background. Parent is a "legacy" at Harvard, or provided start-up capital for a business (Donald Trump). But if your parents were successful (rich), chances are that they got that way by being some combination of smart, hard-working, tenacious, and avoided doing STUPID things to fuck up their lives.
It is perfectly OK to look at someone who is rich and, if you know them and how they got rich, are resentful of it (say, Hunter Biden), but to say that you resent people who are rich is as ignorant as saying you hate Black people or Jews or Muslims.
Most people I know who are "rich" got there by the aforementioned causes: intelligent, hard-working, tenacious, and moral/ethical life.
Go figure.