Bullshit.. Palestinians have MUCH work to do reconstructing their own political representation and process.
That's the LARGER part of the problem. Without organization and consensus -- all these actions that you think are so valiant -- are nothing but futile street theater. Street theater that ends in massive setbacks to the cause almost every time they are exercised. There needs to be more value on Pali quality of life TODAY and less on blaming others for their plight..
Fireworks rockets and floatytillas are not resistance. They are a demonstration that the Palis value perceptions over actual progress for their lives.. They think nothing of trading buildings, hospitals, infrastructure and lives for "publicity stunts"..
So when offering 5 and 10 year truces to the Zionists so they could "reconstruct their own political representation and process" was refused by the Zionists, when the the results of freest, most heavily monitored elections were disregarded by the U.S. and Zionist Israel in favour of a "more favourable" losing faction, what do you expect the Palestinian people to do? They have organisation and consensus, a viable working government infrastructure, as good as any in the West. Surround New York with razor wire fences and watchtowers, control everything and everyone that moves in or out, then when New Yorkers take a few pot shots over the fence use the USAF to carpet bomb Long Island; then repeat the process for 10 years and see how long the organisation, consensus and a viable working government infrastructure survives.
I have no idea what 5 or 10 yr truce you refer to.. But you're in total denial if you think the Palis have had any form of functional unified representation for the past 9 yrs or so.. No elections, no functioning central govt, no authority for diplomacy.. What kind of election ends in NO MORE ELECTIONS ? Or a purge of the losing party and one party control of Gaza? There are consequences to the choices the Palis made. And if you READ the Hamas Charter and the "platform" they ran on ---- YOU and your couch Palis here -- just need to ACCEPT those choices and realize the Palis don't value diplomacy, or functioning govt or infrastructure or commerce over symbolic resistance and perpetual setbacks in their sorry state of living.. That's not gonna end well.. Because lack of organization and planning and governance for the past 100 years is the sole reason for their situation today.
It was a proposal made by hamas for a one sided truce on their terms that stated that hamas could end the truce at any time with no warning given. They admitted this was so they could re-arm and re-equip the next generation of terrorists. They would be allowed to goad Israel into taking action that would also make the truce null and void. Of course the Israeli government refused to sign any such deal
Was this during the last Gaza incursion? During a time of open hostility? Or was this a serious strategic type of "truce" because Hamas was serious about governing.?
This is a ten year old offer.
A truce is referred to in Arabic as a “hudna.” Typically covering 10 years, a hudna is recognized in Islamic jurisprudence as a legitimate and binding contract. A hudna extends beyond the Western concept of a cease-fire and obliges the parties to use the period to seek a permanent, nonviolent resolution to their differences. The Koran finds great merit in such efforts at promoting understanding among different people. Whereas war dehumanizes the enemy and makes it easier to kill, a hudna affords the opportunity to humanize one’s opponents and understand their position with the goal of resolving the intertribal or international dispute.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/11/01/opinion/01yousef.html?_r=0
For a
hudna is not a "truce" in the Western sense of that word. As Dr. Denis MacEoin, writing in the
Middle East Quarterly has observed, thereare more thanseven other Arabic words for truce or cease-fire in Arabic. A better understanding of the full cultural baggage attached to
hudna is necessary in order to grasp what Marzouk has really said:
A
hudna is always temporary, and not for a duration of more than ten years. As a concept, it does not carry within it the potential to develop into a full peace. Rather, it is arrived at during times of Muslim weakness, when it is perceived as desirable to seek a respite from open hostilities.
Historically
hudna is associated with the Truce of al-Hudaybiyya in the seventh century. Muhammad and his followers had abandoned Mecca to non-Muslims because they did not have sufficient strength to hold it. At Hudaybiyya, a truce was negotiated that was to permit the Muslims to return unarmed to Mecca annually for the next ten years for purposes of religious pilgrimage. Two years later, however, using an infraction of the agreement as a pretext, Muhammad and his followers, who then had sufficient strength, moved in and took Mecca; its residents, believing they had a truce with Muhammad, were unprepared to do battle.
This is the model: When weak, strike a temporary truce, utilize the time to regroup and garner additional strength, and then move in.
Once this is understood, then a
hudna with Hamas must be viewed as tactically a negative for Israeli defense. When there is no
hudna in force, Israel is able to act for security purposes, hitting a rocket launching site there, a tunnel from which arms are smuggled there.
Read more:
Blog Really Missing the Point on Hudna