Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is the equivalent statement as when the perp is being interviewed by the cops and he say's "you can't prove anything".
Hey Westwall! Want to tell us again how everyone discharged from the military gets a retired military ID card, and that anyone who says otherwise is lying?
Congrats to you as well for your perfect .000 batting average. You and gslack can battle it out for the title.
And ANYTHING can be googled you twit.
What does "Every Little Fucking Pissant Loves the Fucking Navy" refer to?
What is the answer to the joke "How can you tell if your shipmate is gay?"
Hey, you claim everything can be googled, so google away. 'Course, if you were in the Navy nuke program, you wouldn't need to google such things.
It`s not an "amazing discovery" either.
The fact that black objects radiate more heat per time has been used all over the place.
That`s why power transistor heat sinks are black.
That`s why high performance radiators are black:
Even a dummy like you should know that:
A black body is also a perfect emitter.
Like Waetwall said ,almost everything can be Googled...
Shut the fuck up and show us a DD214 with 4 pennies on it...in the"numan footprint" thread...that`ll do just fine.
It`s not an "amazing discovery" either.
The fact that black objects radiate more heat per time has been used all over the place.
Ever seen an old-style steam radiator painted black? I haven't. Funny how all those dwellers in old apartments around the world have missed the news that their radiators would heat more efficiently if they painted them black.
That`s why power transistor heat sinks are black.
Nah. The theory behind that is that a coat of paint is rougher than polished metal, so it will have more surface area to radiate. It's not the color, it's the increase in surface area.
However, unpainted is more common with heat sinks. Google on "heat sink images" and notice how every image is bare metal.
No, they're usually bare metal. That one was black because someone thought it looked cool, or for corrosion protection. Radiative emission is insignificant in a vehicle radiator, which cools almost entirely by conduction/convection. The radiator doesn't cool at all if air isn't moving through it, as one will quickly find out should their radiator fan fail while in slow traffic.
Answers.com? The place where any random person can write in anything they want? Great source.
A black body is also a perfect emitter.
The blackness of "black body" refers to the perfect absorption of all incoming radiation. It has nothing to do with emitting the radiation back out.
Like Waetwall said ,almost everything can be Googled...
Except, apparently, any question you 3 can't answer, like my questions about the Navy. I mean, if everything can be googled, why can't you 3 tell me the answers?
I am impressed, of course, by perfection of your conspiracy theory. Like all good psuedoscience, your beliefs are unfalsifiable. If what I say can be confirmed by evidence found online, you declare I googled it. And if it can't be confirmed by evidence found online, you declare I can't prove it. And if I upload the evidence to be viewed online, you declare it's a forgery. In your whackaloon cult's world, it is literally impossible for anyone to prove any point that you don't want to be proven.
Shut the fuck up and show us a DD214 with 4 pennies on it...in the"numan footprint" thread...that`ll do just fine.
PolarBear, you're not keeping your promise here.
And you need to. Your bully's-little-toady Gslack took one look, pissed himself, screamed "Just wait until my big brother PolarBear gets here, he'll kick your ass!", and ran for mama's skirts.
Oh wait ... you actually did look at it ... and now you're running in shame, just like Gslack.
Both of you screamed for a week that my first DD214 photo was downloaded from the internet
With the second photo, I proved that wasn't the case.
Rather than apologize for lying about me and getting caught red-handed, both of you are now trying to pretend the whole thing never happened.
And hence, I'm here pressing the faces of you two chickenshit pussbags into the cow patty again, and laughing hard as I do it.
It`s not an "amazing discovery" either.
The fact that black objects radiate more heat per time has been used all over the place.
Ever seen an old-style steam radiator painted black? I haven't. Funny how all those dwellers in old apartments around the world have missed the news that their radiators would heat more efficiently if they painted them black.
That`s why power transistor heat sinks are black.
Nah. The theory behind that is that a coat of paint is rougher than polished metal, so it will have more surface area to radiate. It's not the color, it's the increase in surface area.
However, unpainted is more common with heat sinks. Google on "heat sink images" and notice how every image is bare metal.
No, they're usually bare metal. That one was black because someone thought it looked cool, or for corrosion protection. Radiative emission is insignificant in a vehicle radiator, which cools almost entirely by conduction/convection. The radiator doesn't cool at all if air isn't moving through it, as one will quickly find out should their radiator fan fail while in slow traffic.
Answers.com? The place where any random person can write in anything they want? Great source.
A black body is also a perfect emitter.
The blackness of "black body" refers to the perfect absorption of all incoming radiation. It has nothing to do with emitting the radiation back out.
Like Waetwall said ,almost everything can be Googled...
Except, apparently, any question you 3 can't answer, like my questions about the Navy. I mean, if everything can be googled, why can't you 3 tell me the answers?
I am impressed, of course, by perfection of your conspiracy theory. Like all good psuedoscience, your beliefs are unfalsifiable. If what I say can be confirmed by evidence found online, you declare I googled it. And if it can't be confirmed by evidence found online, you declare I can't prove it. And if I upload the evidence to be viewed online, you declare it's a forgery. In your whackaloon cult's world, it is literally impossible for anyone to prove any point that you don't want to be proven.
In fact, we can be much more precise: a body emits radiation at a given temperature and frequency exactly as well as it absorbs the same radiation.
It's so sad. You two could have just swallowed your pride at the start and said "Mamooth, you're right about the science, thanks for pointing that out." I mean, being a grownup, I admit error all the time. You have to be some kind of emotional toddler to refuse to admit an error.
Alas, that's y'all. You went full metal retard, and set out on your quest for eternal vengeance. And now you've dug way too deep down into the stupid hole to ever climb out. You've lied yourselves into a corner, and your only option is to keep lying harder. And I get to sit back and laugh at it. Life is good.
By the way, the other vets here don't think I'm lying. Would you two like to raise the stupid stakes and declare other vets on the board are lying on my behalf now? If you are, you should head over and tell them. I just want to see how far you're going to ride the stupid train for the sake of this vendetta.
Now, since PolarBear is MIA, he's clearly not taking the bet either. So my work is done there, he's a chicken liar as well. As I promised him, new image available for viewing, with the pennies PolarBear demanded. I'll link to photobucket instead of wasting space here, since it's been seen before. TTFN.
That Thing PolarBear Wanted Photo by mamooth1 | Photobucket
It's so sad. You two could have just swallowed your pride at the start and said "Mamooth, you're right about the science, thanks for pointing that out." I mean, being a grownup, I admit error all the time. You have to be some kind of emotional toddler to refuse to admit an error.
Alas, that's y'all. You went full metal retard, and set out on your quest for eternal vengeance. And now you've dug way too deep down into the stupid hole to ever climb out. You've lied yourselves into a corner, and your only option is to keep lying harder. And I get to sit back and laugh at it. Life is good.
By the way, the other vets here don't think I'm lying. Would you two like to raise the stupid stakes and declare other vets on the board are lying on my behalf now? If you are, you should head over and tell them. I just want to see how far you're going to ride the stupid train for the sake of this vendetta.
Now, since PolarBear is MIA, he's clearly not taking the bet either. So my work is done there, he's a chicken liar as well. As I promised him, new image available for viewing, with the pennies PolarBear demanded. I'll link to photobucket instead of wasting space here, since it's been seen before. TTFN.
That Thing PolarBear Wanted Photo by mamooth1 | Photobucket
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
In fact, we can be much more precise: a body emits radiation at a given temperature and frequency exactly as well as it absorbs the same radiation.
Which just points out a black sphere _absorbs_ more radiation. Which no one ever disputed.
Take two metal spheres. Paint one white, one black. If they are at the same temperature, they will be emitting the same amount of IR radiation.
Again, real world, that FLIR, this time one inside the lab, looking at the furniture. Because absorption is insignificant inside a building, all the furnishings, light and dark, are at the same temperature. So if I would look at a light object and a dark object with the FLIR, they would be displayed as the same shade of grey, because they're emitting the same amounts of IR. The dark objects were most certainly not emitting more.
Dark and light affect absorption, not emission. There are small emission differences due to texture and chemical composition of the surface, but color alone tells you nothing.
Actually, upon further investigation ... I am wrong there. Toddster is right. Live and learn. I rejoice in learning something new.
Anyways, can anyone remember how that was supposed to be related to the topic at hand?
It's so sad. You two could have just swallowed your pride at the start and said "Mamooth, you're right about the science, thanks for pointing that out." I mean, being a grownup, I admit error all the time. You have to be some kind of emotional toddler to refuse to admit an error.
Alas, that's y'all. You went full metal retard, and set out on your quest for eternal vengeance. And now you've dug way too deep down into the stupid hole to ever climb out. You've lied yourselves into a corner, and your only option is to keep lying harder. And I get to sit back and laugh at it. Life is good.
By the way, the other vets here don't think I'm lying. Would you two like to raise the stupid stakes and declare other vets on the board are lying on my behalf now? If you are, you should head over and tell them. I just want to see how far you're going to ride the stupid train for the sake of this vendetta.
Now, since PolarBear is MIA, he's clearly not taking the bet either. So my work is done there, he's a chicken liar as well. As I promised him, new image available for viewing, with the pennies PolarBear demanded. I'll link to photobucket instead of wasting space here, since it's been seen before. TTFN.
That Thing PolarBear Wanted Photo by mamooth1 | Photobucket
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
And now this:http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...-is-not-small-or-harmless-24.html#post7105020
Alas, poor PolarBear fails to comprehend that Photobucket compresses the images you upload to it. The file is 3 meg on my computer, 100k on Photobucket. That is to say, Photobucket creates an entirely new file from the one you send it, and puts an entirely new header on it.
Well done, PolarBear! <clap clap> With your amazing sleuthing skills, you have conclusively proven that PhotoBucket creates a new compressed image when you upload a picture. Any other equally brilliant insights you'd like to share with us?
So, two photos were taken with very different equipment, yet when they went up on Photobucket, they all ended up with nearly identical headers.
You know why? BECAUSE PHOTOBUCKET ADDS A NEW HEADER.
Before you deleted that one which was too obviously a phony which had a forum link: http://i1351.photobucket.com/albums/........p792/mamooth1http://www.usmessageboard.com/envir...-is-not-small-or-harmless-22.html#post7100707
Now, given that PolarBear has engaged me on other threads, he's clearly gone chickenshit on my wager again, so I've proven that point. So I may as well post my DD214. It's a little fuzzy, being I only have a cell phone and no scanner, but it's all readable.
HAHHAHHAHHAAA!
He's already a proven liar and a fake,and yes it is funny. But why are you laughing it's your boy... I bet you kick puppies too...
Your collective...
It took only as long as it takes for 4 puffs on my cigar to debunk the "Nuclear Admiral`s" latest scam..:
and has a new digital fingerprint:
Which is an easy thing to do. All you had to do is take the phony DD214 that you downloaded , make it part of a photo slide collection and then it comes out with this digitial finger print:
And there is something else you forgot to do when you switched that picture that you said you took with your cellphone and then put 4 coins on it you forgot to manipulate these little band aids that you used to cover your ID in the "old picture" so that they were not within a thousandth of an inch in exactly the same positions as with the new photo session over a week later when you put the coins in the picture...and without disturbing them put them on the Indianapolis Star.
You even managed to get the exact same curl on that "authentic document" over a weak later.
It took only as long as it takes for 4 puffs on my cigar to debunk the "Nuclear Admiral`s" latest scam..:
I know you guys find me impressive, but seriously, you look loony elevating me to admiral status.
Supersleuth PolarBear is on the case again!and has a new digital fingerprint:
Yes, once more he has conclusively proven that if you upload an image to PhotoBucket, PhotoBucket makes a new compressed file with an entirely new header! Nothing gets by PolarBear! <clap clap>
Which PhotoBucket made. Why does such a simple concept continue to elude you?
It's this truly wondrous invention called "tape". Which is visible in the photos. See, when you tape something to the document, it stays in the same place.And there is something else you forgot to do when you switched that picture that you said you took with your cellphone and then put 4 coins on it you forgot to manipulate these little band aids that you used to cover your ID in the "old picture" so that they were not within a thousandth of an inch in exactly the same positions as with the new photo session over a week later when you put the coins in the picture...and without disturbing them put them on the Indianapolis Star.
And holy shit, you're stupid. I know it's obvious, but it just had to be said.
Because it's the same document, dumbass. Of course it curls in the same way. If it didn't, you'd declare that was proof of something.You even managed to get the exact same curl on that "authentic document" over a weak later.
Shall I put a crease in it and do it again, to make you happy? No point, of course. You'd just invent some other insanely stupid reason to declare it's a forgery. You've lied yourself into a corner, so you have to keep lying with this birther-style nonsense.
All I have to do is print out your phony picture with my HP printer, fold it, put some Canadian coins on it and feed it back to you as my dd214
All I have to do is print out your phony picture with my HP printer, fold it, put some Canadian coins on it and feed it back to you as my dd214
Can you explain why the second picture, the one you call the duplicate, is much clearer than what you call the original?
I mean, I can explain it. I made sure my hand didn't shake as much when I photographed my DD214 the second time. Indoor photography without a flash means long exposure times, so got to keep the camera steady. However, I'd like to hear your insanely stupid conspiracy theory which explains how I somehow took a blurry photo off the internet and made all the text clearer. Maybe your super sleuthing header skills can figure it out.
Wait, here's a thought. You could just admit that you made a really dumb mistake at the start, didn't have the emotional maturity to admit your error, and thus you've dug a hole down to stupidland and built a castle there. It's not like anyone else doesn't think that.
