The House is focused on Adam Schiff for false accusations against Trump

[Rawley]

The problem with the GOP is the large contigent of Rinos.

Not going to disagree with that, but this vote isn't an indicator

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

After seven years of investigation, that is what the evidence has shown. Get over it. Trump-45, Lying Dems-0

I believe Durham's investigation was just 5...but I can see why you feel like it was 7.....


And this is the only scoreboard that most of us will remember..

 

[Concerned American]

I believe Durham's investigation was just 5...but I can see why you feel like it was 7.....


And this is the only scoreboard that most of us will remember..


View attachment 797527

And the guy at the center of it all has not seen a conviction for ANYTHING. That should tell any thinking person that there is partisan political games being played. Key word--thinking

 

[Blaster]

And the guy at the center of it all has not seen a conviction for ANYTHING. That should tell any thinking person that there is partisan political games being played. Key word--thinking

Everything about it is just political circus.

 

[nomadic5]

Again, fivee of them are on the Ethics Committee and had to essentially recuse themselves because they are now tasked with taking further action against Schiff.

Ok... I guess I get this. They kind of had to?

I never claimed to be an expert on Congressional procedures! What American can claim that?

 

[Rawley]

Ok... I guess I get this. They kind of had to?

I never claimed to be an expert on Congressional procedures! What American can claim that?

Kind of had too. Still Kabuki theater though. Trying to cut off claims of bias The ethics committee will probably vote to expel him, but that takes a 2/3rds vote of the House to actually kick him out - never going to happen

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

And the guy at the center of it all has not seen a conviction for ANYTHING. That should tell any thinking person that there is partisan political games being played. Key word--thinking

Well, sitting presidents don't get convicted.....which is why Trump is so desperate to be re-elected....

Guess who else didn't even get charged, let alone convicted?

EVERYONE YOU WANTED TO SEE LOCKED UP


Why are conservatives such pussies??

 

[Concerned American]

Why are conservatives such pussies??

When did you claim to be a conservative?

 

[nomadic5]

Kind of had too. Still Kabuki theater though. Trying to cut off claims of bias The ethics committee will probably vote to expel him, but that takes a 2/3rds vote of the House to actually kick him out - never going to happen

well, it could... if Dims woke up and smelled the coffee... you know.. the coffee of:

voters are going to notice they didn't vote against LYING

a big thing... very big

(at least to some of us.. the sane ones [not that it takes much to be saner than the dims])

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

When did you claim to be a conservative?

I am not a Conservative...and you would definitely have to be a pussy to worship this guy as a "strong man"





How do you pretend a grown man that whines more than a teen-age brat on punishment - is strong? Only a pussy could....and here you are...

 

[Concerned American]

How do you pretend a grown man that whines more than a teen-age brat on punishment

I didn't. You posted it. You spend more time obsessing over that guy than most on this forum. What is amazing is you defend the inept POS that is in the WH and all of the morons that keep him there.

 

[nomadic5]

I believe Durham's investigation was just 5...but I can see why you feel like it was 7.....


And this is the only scoreboard that most of us will remember..


View attachment 797527

as usual, a lib doesn't give a SOURCE for his so called "information"

sounds like BS at this point.

215 criminal indictments!

You are out of your little pea brain

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

as usual, a lib doesn't give a SOURCE for his so called "information"

sounds like BS at this point.

215 criminal indictments!

You are out of your little pea brain

I noticed you were skeptical of the 215 Trump indictments -- but didn't question the ZERO INDICTMENTS during the Obama admin....even you morons know not to even pretend to lie about that one huh...

But here is what I am going to do....



I am going to give you the first source.....to which you will complain about the source instead of refuting a single word I said....let's watch...

"This claim exaggerates the number of indictments under Trump, in particular, by counting the number of criminal charges filed, rather than the number of people indicted; and it includes the indictments of people who are not part of his administration, such as 25 Russians."

Many more indictments under 3 GOP vs 3 Dem presidents

RELATED: Read all of PolitiFact’s coverage on Donald Trump indictments A Facebook post claimed that there have been 317

www.politifact.com

So cool...if the number indictments makes you upset; and indictments those Russians got being added; made you have a sad...cool...we will subtract those indictments...


How about this...does this make you cope and seethe?

 

[Concerned American]

but didn't question the ZERO INDICTMENTS during the Obama admin

You and Schiff. Indictments mean ZIP in the US. You have to have evidence to obtain CONVICTIONS. I am unaware that Trump has been convicted of ANYTHING because the democrats have not PROVED a case even once. Try again.

 

[nomadic5]

I noticed you were skeptical of the 215 Trump indictments -- but didn't question the ZERO INDICTMENTS during the Obama admin....even you morons know not to even pretend to lie about that one huh...

But here is what I am going to do....

how abysmally DISHONEST

but then I guess you dims don't see Lois Lerner as a scandal?

ok... whatever.. outa here!

oh wait... did I mention the pallets of cash given to IRAN of all countries in the middle of the night by obummer?

that's not a scandal either, is it?

you don't watch news... just maybe cnn but again,

you don't watch news...